Advertisement

Social Media

  • Fausto Martin De Sanctis
Chapter

Abstract

Internet became a common place to diffuse relevant values and opinions. Such a role should strengthen their primary objectives and commitments as eminently social institutions. Social media should balance the protection of freedom of expression and the need to curb online crimes, through appropriate regulation.

Keywords

Social media policy Security Freedom of speech 

References

  1. 1.
    Rudolph, C. (2013). Unleashing law reviews onto social media: Preventing mishaps with a social-media policy. Thomas M. Cooley Law Review, 30, 187–191.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mcpeak, A. (2014). Social media snooping and its ethical bounds. Arizona State Law Journal, 46, 845–897.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bailov, A. V., & Sakhuta, P. V. (2016). Mass media as crime determinants. The Journal of Eastern European Law, 24, 14–17.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gervais, R. (2015). Authors, online. Columbia Journal of Law & The Arts, 38, 385–396.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harawa, D. S. (2014). Social medial thought crimes. Pace Law Review, 35, 366–397.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Silver, D. (2011). Media censorship and access to terrorism trials: A social architecture analysis. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 25, 143–186.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Froomkin, A. M. (2017). Lessons learned too well: Anonymity in a time of surveillance. Arizona Law Review, 59, 95–159.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sidhu, D. S. (2007). The chilling effect of government surveillance programs on the use of the internet by Muslim-Americans. University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender & Class, 7, 375–393.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Siserman, C. (2013). A global perspective on the protection of privacy and related human rights in countering the use of internet for terrorist purposes. Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology, 7, 401–422.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Prichard, J., Watters, P., Krone, T., Spiranovic, C., & Cockburn, H. (2015). Social media sentiment analysis: A new empirical tool for assessing public opinion on crime. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 27(2), 217–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Browning, J. G. (2016). Introducing social media evidence. Advocate Texas, Chapter 15, 21–22.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Waters, G. (2012). Social media and law enforcement: Potential risks. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 1, 1–5.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yar, M. (2012). E-Crime 2.0: The criminological landscape of new social media. Information & Communication Technology Law, 21(3), 207–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vanlandingham, R. E. (2017). Jailing the Twitter bird: Social media, material support to terrorism, and muzzling the modern press. Cardozo Law Review, 39, 1–56.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Klein, S., & Flinn, C. (2017). Social media compliance programs and the war against terrorism. Harvard National Security Journal, 8, 53–112.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tsesis, A. (2017). Terrorist speech on social media. Vanderbilt Law Review, 70, 651–708.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Roberts, W. (2016). Terrorists on social media. Washington Lawyer, 31, 26–29.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Davis, B. R. (2006). Ending the cyber jihad: Combatting terrorist exploitation of the internet with the rule of law and improved tools for cyber governance. CommLaw Conspectus, 15, 119–186.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fausto Martin De Sanctis
    • 1
  1. 1.3rd RegionFederal Court of AppealsSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations