Advertisement

Predication Sortalism

  • Max A. Freund
Chapter
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 408)

Abstract

The focus of this chapter is on predication sortalism, that is, the view that exercise of predication necessarily requires sortal concepts. We distinguish two interpretation of this view; one we call radical and the other moderate predication sortalism. For each of these interpretations a semantic system is characterized. Both semantics are for the bidimensional formal language of Chap.  3 and provide a non-standard interpretation of predication. We state a formal system for moderate predication sortalism and show the system to be sound and complete, with respect to the semantics for moderate predication sortalism. We also indicate how to formulate a formal system for radical predication sortalism as well as show its soundness and completeness.

Keywords

Predication Sortalism Temporal-modal logic 

References

  1. Ayers, M. (1997). Is Physical Object a sortal concept? A reply to Xu. Mind and Language, 12, 393–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baghramain, M., & Carter, J. A. (2015). Relativism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2018 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives//win2018/entries/relativism/
  3. Baker, M. (2003). Lexical categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Casati, R. (2004). Is the object concept formal? Dialectica, 58, 383–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davidson, D. (1974). On the very idea of a conceptual scheme. In Davidson (2001) (pp. 183–198).Google Scholar
  6. Freund, M. (2018). Predication and sortal concepts. Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-02030-7
  7. Gelmand, S., & Kalish, C. (2006). Conceptual development. In Kuhn and Siegler (2006) (pp. 687–733).Google Scholar
  8. Hirsch, E. (1997). Basic objects: A reply to Xu. Mind and language, 12, 406–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lowe, E. (2009). More kinds of beings: A further study of individuation, identity and the logic of sortal terms. Sussex: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Soames, S. (2010). What is meaning? Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Soames, S. (2015). Rethinking language, mind, and meaning. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Stalmaszczyk, P. (Ed.). (2017a). Philosophy and logic of predication. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  13. Stalmaszczyk, P. (Ed.). (2017b). Understanding Predication. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  14. Tomasello, M. (2006). Acquiring linguistic construction. In Kuhn and Siegler (2006) (pp. 255–298). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Waxman, S., & Lidz, J. (2006). Early word learning. In Kuhn and Siegler (2006) (pp. 299–335).Google Scholar
  16. Wiggins, D. (1997). Sortal concepts: A reply to Xu. Mind and Language, 12, 413–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Xu, F. (1997). From Lot’s wife to a pillar of salt: Evidence that physical object is a sortal concept. Mind and Language, 12(3–4), 365–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Xu, F. (2007). Sortal concepts, object individuation, and language. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11, 400–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Xu, F., & Carey, S. (1996). Infants metaphysics: The case of numerical identity. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 111–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Xu, F., Carey, S., & Welch, J. (1999). Infant’s ability to use object kind information for object individuation. Cognition, 70, 137–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Max A. Freund
    • 1
  1. 1.Professor of Logic and Philosophy, Graduate Program in PhilosophyUniversity of Costa RicaSan JoséCosta Rica

Personalised recommendations