Advertisement

Statistical Methods for Estimating Yield Changes Attributable to Climate Change

  • S. Niggol Seo
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter provides a review of the literature of statistical methods for estimating yield/productivity changes of major crops, plants, and other resources that are attributable to climate change. A host of statistical yield estimation techniques were developed as an effort to describe yield changes of staple crops of the world such as corn, wheat, rice, soybeans, and cotton. The statistical techniques were originated because climate researchers wanted to make use of the readily available national yield data such as the US agricultural census. In contrast to the field/laboratory experiments reviewed in the previous chapter, applications of the statistical techniques have resulted in the predictions of extremely severe losses of yields of grains caused by future climate changes. This chapter explains underlying factors that may explain the discrepancies between the predictions from this tradition and those from other traditions. The empirical results from the yield statistical studies were interpreted in the context of providing a rationale for the GCF’s funding allocations into vulnerable major crops.

Keywords

Statistical methods Crop yields Staple crops Crop growth Field experiment GCF 

References

  1. Adams RM, McCarl BA, Mearns LO (2003) The effects of spatial scale of climate scenarios on economic assessments: an example from U.S. agriculture. Clim Chang 60:131–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ainsworth EA, Long SP (2005) What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2. New Phytol 165:351–371Google Scholar
  3. Auffhammer M, Ramaathan V, Vincent JR (2006) Integrated model shows that atmospheric brown clouds and greenhouse gases have reduced rice harvests in India. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:19668–19672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Conley TG (1999) GMM estimation with cross sectional dependence. J Econ 92:1–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deschenes O, Greenstone M (2007) The economic impacts of climate change: evidence from agricultural output and random fluctuations in weather. Am Econ Rev 97:354–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deschenes O, Greenstone M (2012) The economic impacts of climate change: evidence from agricultural output and random fluctuations in weather: reply. Am Econ Rev 102:3761–3773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Evenson R, Gollin D (2003) Assessing the impact of the Green Revolution 1960–2000. Science 300:758–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. FAO (2017) FAO STAT. FAO Statistics Division, Rome. Available at http://faostat.fao.org Google Scholar
  9. Fisher AC, Hanemann WM, Roberts MJ, Schlenker W (2012) The economic impacts of climate change: evidence from agricultural output and random fluctuations in weather: comment. Am Econ Rev 102:3749–3760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (1995) Dimensions of need: an atlas of food and agriculture. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  11. Green Climate Fund (GCF) (2011) Governing instrument for the green climate fund. GCF, Songdo CityGoogle Scholar
  12. Green Climate Fund (GCF) (2018a) Annex III: investment framework. GCF, Songdo CityGoogle Scholar
  13. Green Climate Fund (GCF) (2018b) Annex IX: results management framework. GCF, Songdo CityGoogle Scholar
  14. Green Climate Fund (GCF) (2018c) Projects + programmes. GCF, Songdo City. Accessed from https://www.greenclimate.fund/what-we-do/projects-programmes Google Scholar
  15. Hahn GL, Gaughan JB, Mader TL, Eigenberg RA (2009) Chapter 5: Thermal indices and their applications for livestock environments. In: DeShazer JA (ed) Livestock energetics and thermal environmental management. ASABE, St. Joseph, pp 113–130. Copyright 2009 American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. ASABE #801M0309. ISBN 1-892769-74-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harris I, Jones PD, Osborn TJ, Lister DH (2014) Updated high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations – the CRU TS3.10 Dataset. Int J Climatol 34:623–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2014a) Climate Change 2014: the physical science basis. The fifth assessment report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2014b) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. The fifth assessment report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones CA, Kiniry JR (1986) CERES-Maize: a stimulation model of maize growth and development. Texas A&M University Press, College StationGoogle Scholar
  20. Kala N (2015) Ambiguity aversion and learning in a changing world: the potential effects of climate change from Indian agriculture. Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  21. Laffont J, Martimort D (2002) The theory of incentives: the principal-agent model. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  22. Le Treut H, Somerville R, Cubasch U, Ding Y, Mauritzen C, Mokssit A, Peterson T, Prather M (2007) Historical overview of climate change. In: Solomon S et al (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. The fourth assessment report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. Lobell D, Schlenker W, Costa-Roberts J (2011) Climate trends and global crop production since 1980. Science 333:616–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mader TL, Davis MS (2004) Effect of management strategies on reducing heat stress of feedlot cattle: feed and water intake. J Anim Sci 82:3077–3087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McCarl BA, Villavicencio X, Wu X (2008) Climate change and future analysis: is stationarity dying? Am J Agric Econ 90:1241–1247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McKinsey JW Jr, Evenson RE (1998) Technology-climate interactions: was the Green Revolution in India climate friendly? In: Dinar A, Mendelsohn R, Evenson R, Parikh J, Sanghi A, Kumar K, McKinsey J, Lonergan S (eds) Measuring the impact of climate change on Indian agriculture, World Bank Technical Paper no. 402. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  27. Mendelsohn R, Nordhaus W, Shaw D (1994) The impact of global warming on agriculture: a Ricardian analysis. Am Econ Rev 84:753–771Google Scholar
  28. Nakicenovic N, Davidson O, Davis G, Grübler A, Kram T, La Rovere EL, Metz B, Morita T, Pepper W, Pitcher H, Sankovski A, Shukla P, Swart R, Watson R, Dadi Z (2000) Emissions scenarios. a special report of working group III of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. IPCC, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  29. National Agricultural Statistical Service (NASS) (2018) Census of agriculture. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/index.php Google Scholar
  30. Nordhaus W (2006) Geography and macroeconomics: new data and new findings. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(10):3510–3517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Open Government Data Platform of India (2018) Available at https://data.gov.in/sector/agriculture
  32. Reich PB, Hobbie SE, Lee TD, Pastore MA (2018) Unexpected reversal of C3 versus C4 grass response to elevated CO2 during a 20-year field experiment. Science 360:317–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rosenzweig C, Iglesias A, Yang XB, Epstein PR, Chivian E (2001) Climate change and extreme weather events: implications for food production, plant diseases, and pests. Glob Change Hum Health 2(2):90–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ruttan VW (2002) Productivity growth in world agriculture: sources and constraints. J Econ Perspect 16:161–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schenkler W, Hanemann M, Fisher A (2005) Will US agriculture really benefit from global warming? Accounting for irrigation in the hedonic approach. Am Econ Rev 95:395–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schlenker W, Lobell D (2010) Robust negative impacts of climate change on African agriculture. Environ Res Lett 5:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schlenker W, Roberts M (2009) Nonlinear temperature effects indicate severe damages to crop yields under climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(37):15594–15598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Seo SN (2010a) Is an integrated farm more resilient against climate change? A micro-econometric analysis of portfolio diversification in African agriculture. Food Policy 35:32–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Seo SN (2010b) A microeconometric analysis of adapting portfolios to climate change: adoption of agricultural systems in Latin America. Appl Econ Perspect Policy 32:489–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Seo SN (2012a) Adapting natural resource enterprises under global warming in South America: a mixed logit analysis. Economia 12:111–135Google Scholar
  41. Seo SN (2012b) Decision making under climate risks: an analysis of Sub-Saharan farmers’ adaptation behaviors. Weather Clim Soc 4:285–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Seo SN (2013a) Refining spatial resolution and spillovers of a microeconometric model of adapting portfolios to climate change. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 18:1019–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Seo SN (2013b) An essay on the impact of climate change on US agriculture: weather fluctuations, climatic shifts, and adaptation strategies. Climate Change 121:115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Seo SN (2014a) Evaluation of agro-ecological zone methods for the study of climate change with micro farming decisions in Sub-Saharan Africa. Eur J Agron 52:157–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Seo SN (2014b) Coupling climate risks, eco-systems, and anthropogenic decisions using South American and sub-Saharan farming activities. Meteorol Appl 21:848–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Seo SN (2014c) Adapting sensibly when global warming turns the field brown or blue: a comment on the 2014 IPCC Report. Econ Aff 34:399–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Seo SN (2015) Helping low-latitude, poor countries with climate change. Regulation 38(4):6–8. Winter 2015–2016Google Scholar
  48. Seo SN (2016a) Modeling farmer adaptations to climate change in South America: a micro-behavioral economic perspective. Environ Ecol Stat 23:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Seo SN (2016b) The micro-behavioral framework for estimating total damage of global warming on natural resource enterprises with full adaptations. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 21:328–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Seo SN (2016c) Microbehavioral econometric methods: theories, models, and applications for the study of environmental and natural resources. Academic, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  51. Seo SN (2016d) Untold tales of goats in deadly Indian monsoons: adapt or rain-retreat under global warming? J Extreme Events 03:1650001.  https://doi.org/10.1142/S2345737616500019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Seo SN (2019) Will farmers fully adapt to monsoonal climate changes? An analysis of rice in Thailand. J Agric Sci. (under revision)Google Scholar
  53. Seo SN, Mendelsohn R (2008a) An analysis of crop choice: adapting to climate change in South American farms. Ecol Econ 67:109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Seo SN, Mendelsohn R (2008b) Measuring impacts and adaptations to climate change: a structural Ricardian model of African livestock management. Agric Econ 38:151–165Google Scholar
  55. Seo SN, Mendelsohn R, Munasinghe M (2005) Climate change and agriculture in Sri Lanka: a Ricardian valuation. Environ Dev Econ 10:581–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Seo SN, Mendelsohn R, Dinar A, Hassan R, Kurukulasuriya P (2008) Differential adaptation strategies of African cropland across agro-ecological zones, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4601. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  57. Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Meehl GA (2012) An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93:485–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tubiello FN, Ewert F (2002) Simulating the effects of elevated CO2 on crops: approaches and applications for climate change. Eur J Agron 18:57–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. United States Census Bureau (2012) Statistical abstract of the United States: 2012. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC. Accessed from https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2011/compendia/statab/131ed.html Google Scholar
  60. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2012) Census of agriculture 2012. USDA, Washington, DC. Accessed at https://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2012/#full_report Google Scholar
  61. Welch JR, Vincent JR, Auffhammer M, Moya PF, Dobermann A, Dawe D (2010) Rice yields in tropical/subtropical Asia exhibit large but opposing sensitivities to minimum and maximum temperatures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:14562–14567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. World Bank (2008) World development report 2008: agriculture for development. World Bank, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. World Bank (2009) Awakening Africa’s sleeping giant: prospects for commercial agriculture in the Guinea Savannah zone and beyond. World Bank and FAO, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  64. World Bank (2017) Climate change knowledge portal for development practitioners and policy makers: Thailand. World Bank, Washington DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Niggol Seo
    • 1
  1. 1.Muaebak Institute of Global Warming StudiesSeorim-dong, Gwanak-gu, SeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations