Advertisement

Using Self-video-based Discourse in Training Physics Teachers

  • Yaron LehaviEmail author
  • Avraham Merzel
  • Ruti Segal
  • Ami Baram
  • Bat-Sheva Eylon
Chapter
  • 240 Downloads

Abstract

Videotaping is widely accepted as a useful tool for teachers’ education and learning. Analyzing their own teaching videos was found to be especially valuable for those teachers who became aware of more relevant components of teaching and learning and induced changes in a wide range of their pedagogical habits. From another perspective, educational reformers pointed out that increasing teachers’ engagement in peer discourse is linked to greater student achievements, an innovative climate and improved educational reform implementation and sustainability. Here we describe a study of an approach designed to develop physics and mathematics educators’ proficiency in conducting a peer video based didactic discourse. Our preliminary results indicate that participation in training workshops according to this approach enhanced the participants’ level of awareness [1] and abilities to focus their attention on subject matter (physics and mathematics and their teaching) oriented issues.

Keywords

Professional development Teachers’ instructors Self-videoing Levels of awareness 

References

  1. 1.
    Mason, J.: Enabling teachers to be real teachers: necessary levels of awareness and structure of attention. J. Math. Teach. Educ. 1(3), 243–267 (1998).  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009973717476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sherin, M.G.: New perspectives on the role of video in teacher education. In: Brophy, J. (ed.) Using Video in Teacher Education, pp. 1–28). Elsevier, Amsterdam (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Santagata, R., Guarino, J.: Using video to teach future teachers to learn from teaching. ZDM Int. J. Math. Educ. 43(1), 133–145 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-010-0292-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blomberg, G., Sherin, M.G., Renkl, A., Glogger, I., Seidel, T.: Understanding video as a tool for teacher education: investigating instructional strategies to promote reflection. Instr. Sci. 42(3), 443–463 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9281-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Calandra, B., Rich, P.J.: Digital video for teacher education: research and practice. Routledge, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Honebein, P.C.: Seven goals for the design of constructivist learning environments. In: Wilson, B.G. (ed.) Constructivist learning environments: Case Studies in instructional design. Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, pp. 11–24 (1996)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sherin, M.G.: The development of teachers’ professional vision in video clubs. In Goldman, R., Pea, R., Barron, B., Derry, S.J. (eds.) Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 383–395). Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    van Es, E., Tunney, J., Seago, N., Goldsmith, L.T.: Facilitation practices for supporting teacher learning with video. In: Calandra, B., Rich, P.J. (eds.) Digital Video for Teacher Education: Research and Practice. Routledge, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    van Es, E.: Participants’ roles in the context of a video club. J. Learn. Sci. 18(1), 100–137 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400802581668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    van Es, E., Sherin, M.G.: Mathematics teachers’ “learning to notice” in the context of a video club. Teach. Teach. Educ. 24(2), 244–276 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang, M., Koehler, M.J., Lundeberg, M.: Affordances and challenges of different types of video for teachers’ professional development. In: Calandra, B., Rich, P.J. (eds.) Digital Video for Teacher Education: Research and Practice (Chap. 9). Routledge, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sherin, M.G., van Es, E.: Effects of video club participation on teachers’ professional vision. J. Teach. Educ. 60(1), 20–37 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108328155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., Pittman, M.: Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teach. Teach. Educ. 24(2), 417–436 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Krammer, K., Ratzka, N., Klieme, E., Lipowsky, F., Pauli, C., Reusser, K.: Learning with classroom videos: conception and first results of an online teacher-training program. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik 38(5), 422–432 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02652803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sherin, M.G., Han, S.Y.: Teacher learning in the context of a video club. Teach. Teach. Educ. 20(2), 163–183 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.08.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tripp, T.R., Rich, P.J.: The influence of video analysis on the process of teacher change. Teach. Teach. Educ. 28(5), 728–739 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Seidel, T., Stürmer, K., Blomberg, G., Kobarg, M., Schwindt, K.: Teacher learning from analysis of videotaped classroom situations: does it make a difference whether teachers observe their own teaching or that of others? Teach. Teach. Educ. 27(2), 259–267 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Supovitz, A.J.: Developing communities of instructional practice. Teach. Coll. Rec. 104, 1591–1626 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Borko, H.: Professional development and teacher learning: mapping the terrain. Educ. Res. 33(8), 3–15 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Leana, C., Pil, F.K.: Social capital and organizational performance: evidence from urban public schools. Organ. Sci. 17, 353–366 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pil, F.K., Leana, C.: Applying organizational research to public school reform: the effects of teacher human and social capital on student performance. Acad. Manag. J. 52(6), 1101–1124 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sun, M., Wilhelm, A.G., Larson, C.J., Frank, K.A.: Exploring colleagues’ professional influence on mathematics teachers’ learning. Teach. Coll. Rec. 116(6), 1–30 (2014)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Segal, R., Lehavi, Y., Merzel, A., Baram, A., Eylon, B-S.: Using self-video-based conversations in training mathematics teacher instructors. In: Bergqvist, E., Österholm, M., Granberg, C., Sumpter, L. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 42nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, vol. 1, pp. XX–YY. PME, Umeå (2018)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lehavi, Y., Merzel, A., Segal, R., Baram, A., Eylon, B-S.: Using self-video-based conversations In training physics teachers. In: Talk presented at the Conference of International Research Group on Physics Teaching (GIREP), Dublin, Ireland (2017)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chapman, O.: Mathematics teachers’ perspectives of turning points in their teaching. In: Kaur, B., Ho, W.K., Toh, T.L., Choy, B.H. (eds.) Proceedings of the 41st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, vol. 1. PME, Singapore (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The David Yellin Academic College of EducationJerusalemIsrael
  2. 2.The Weizmann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael
  3. 3.The Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
  4. 4.Oranim Academic College of EducationKiryat Tiv’onIsrael

Personalised recommendations