Camels, Dummy, and the Importance of Context
Economic design problems are more successful in garnering support from practitioners when the axioms are relevant to the practical context. We use the well-known Dummy axiom as a concentrated example of several ways in which axioms can fail to be meaningful in practice. We then describe two channels through which characterization results using axioms that are not relevant to a specific context can undermine the axiomatic program, both from an internal (theoretical) standpoint and from its relationship with the practical world. Yet, a great deal of intellectual stimulation can be found in disciplining ourselves to be guided by context, despite the theorist’s traditional leaning towards universality.
- Abdul-Rauf, M. (1996). Imam Ali Ibn Abi Talib: The First Intellectual Muslim Thinker (p. 106). Alexandria: Al-Saadawi Publications.Google Scholar
- Moulin, H. (2002). Axiomatic cost and surplus-sharing. In K. J. Arrow, A. Sen, & K. Suzumura (Eds.), The handbook of social choice and welfare. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
- Schummer, J., & Serizawa, S. (2019). The Role of Characterizations in Market Design. [This volume].Google Scholar
- Schummer, J., & Vohra, R. V. (2013). Assignment of arrival slots. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 5(2), 164–185.Google Scholar