Advertisement

Optimal Placement and Sizing of Parking Lots for the Plug-In Electric Vehicles Considering the Technical, Social, and Geographical Aspects

  • Mehdi Rahmani-Andebili
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter studies the planning problem of parking lot sizing and placement in the electrical distribution network considering the security constraints of the system and modelling the technical, social, and geographical aspects of the problem. In this study, the planning problem is investigated from the local distribution company’s (DISCO) point of view to minimize the total cost of problem during the planning period considering the economic factors such as inflation and interest rates. The cost terms of planning problem include the investment cost to install the parking lots in the system and equip them with the charging/discharging stations, the present worth value of maintenance cost of parking lots and their equipment during the planning period, the present worth value of incentives paid to the drivers to motivate them to provide vehicle-to-grid (V2G) service at suggested parking lots during the planning interval, the present worth value of energy loss cost of branches during the planning time horizon, and the present worth value of energy not supplied (ENS) cost due to the power outage during the planning period. Herein, the feeder’s failure rate (FFR) and the electricity consumer’s load (residential, commercial, and industrial), as the voltage-dependent load (VDL), are modelled. Moreover, the real driving routes of vehicles in San Francisco are considered. In this study, several scenarios are defined to study the effect of different social classes of drivers, PEV penetration levels, PEV types (Citroën C-Zero and Tesla Model S), FFR model, and VDL model on the problem outputs. It is demonstrated that the abovementioned parameters can affect the security level of system (voltage profile of buses and apparent power of branches), the optimal value of problem outputs (hourly location and size of parking lots and hourly value of incentive), the problem indices (energy loss, ENS, and reliability indices of system), and the value of objective function of planning problem (minimum value of total cost of planning problem). Furthermore, it is noticed that ignoring the real models of FFR and VDL can negatively influence the optimal value of problem outputs and result in the misleading and unpractical consequences.

Keywords

Drivers’ behavioral model Feeder’s failure rate (FFR) model Geographical aspect Parking lot allocation and sizing Plug-in electric vehicle (PEV) Vehicle-to-grid (V2G) Voltage-dependent load (VDL) model 

References

  1. 1.
    N. Lutsey, Global climate change mitigation potential from a transition to electric vehicles, International Council on Clean Transportation, 2015. [Online]. Available: http://theicct.org/global-ev-2050-ghg-mitigation-potential. Accessed on Jan 2019
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    A. Gagarin, P. Corcoran, Multiple domination models for placement of electric vehicle charging stations in road networks. Comput. Oper. Res. 96, 69–79 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Rahmani-Andebili, Optimal power factor for optimally located and sized solar parking lots applying quantum annealing. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 10, 2538–2547 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S.M. Mohammadi-Hosseininejad, A. Fereidunian, A. Shahsavari, H. Lesani, A healer reinforcement approach to self-healing in smart grid by PHEVs parking lot allocation. IEEE Trans. Ind. Info. 12(6), 2020–2030 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S.M. Mohammadi-Hosseininejad, A. Fereidunian, H. Lesani, Reliability improvement considering plug-in hybrid electric vehicles parking lots ancillary services: A stochastic multi-criteria approach. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 12(4), 824–833 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Rahmani-Andebili, G.K. Venayagamoorthy, SmartPark placement and operation for improving system reliability and market participation. Electr. Pow. Syst. Res. (Elsevier) 123(6), 21–30 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Rahmani-Andebili, H. Shen, M. Fotuhi Firuzabad, Planning and operation of parking lots considering system, traffic, and drivers behavioral model. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2018.2824122
  11. 11.
    M. Rahmani-Andebili, H. Shen, Traffic and grid-based parking lot allocation for PEVs considering driver behavioral model, in International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC), Silicon Valley, USA, 26–29 Jan 2017Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Rahmani-Andebili, M. Fotuhi Firuzabad, An adaptive approach for PEVs charging management and reconfiguration of electrical distribution system penetrated by renewables. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 14(5), 2001 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    [Online]. Available: https://crawdad.org/all-byname.html. Accessed on Jan 2019
  15. 15.
    M. Rahmani-Andebili, Economic and network-driven distributed generation placement modeling Feeder’s failure rate and Customer’s load type. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 63(3), 1598–1606 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Rahmani-Andebili, Simultaneous placement of DG and capacitor in distribution network. Electr. Pow. Syst. Res. (Elsevier) 131, 1–10 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. Rahmani-Andebili, Reliability and economic-driven switchable capacitor placement in distribution network. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 9(13), 1572–1579 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. Rahmani-Andebili, Effect of load models on optimal capacitor allocation in distribution network, in IEEE Electric Power Distribution Networks Conference (EPDC), Tehran, Iran, pp. 1–4, 2–3 May 2012Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    IEEE Task Force on Load Representation for Dynamic Performance, Bibliography on load models for power flow and dynamic performance simulation. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 10, 523–538 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    R.E. Brown, Electric Power Distribution Reliability (Marcel Dekker Inc., New York/Basel, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    P.L. Lewin, J.E. Theed, A.E. Davies, S.T. Larsen, Method for rating power cables buried in surface troughs. IEE Proc., Gener. Transm. Distrib. 146, 360–364 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    [Online]. Available: http://www.elektriauto.ee/eng.y. Accessed on Jan 2019

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mehdi Rahmani-Andebili
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physics and AstronomyUniversity of Alabama in HuntsvilleHuntsvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations