Artificial Olfaction System

  • Müştak E. YalçınEmail author
  • Tuba Ayhan
  • Ramazan Yeniçeri
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology book series (BRIEFSAPPLSCIENCES)


Performance of an artificial olfaction system depends on the success and speed of its classification according to the chosen problem. In this chapter, the feature extraction part just before the classification part is exploited to reach a better performance for artificial olfaction systems, and cellular nonlinear network-based feature extraction models are presented. For achieving the best performance for different problems on the same network, a reconfigurable cellular neural network is introduced as a feature extractor.


  1. 1.
    T.C. Pearce, S.S. Schiffman, Handbook of Machine Olfaction: Electronic Nose Technology (Wiley-VCH, 2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. Nef, How we smell: the molecular and cellular bases of olfaction. News Physiol. Sci. 13, 1–5 (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Zarzo, The sense of smell: molecular basis of odorant recognition. Biol. Rev. 82(3), 455–479 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. Buck, R. Axel, A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors—a molecular-basis for odor recognition. Cell 65(1), 175–187 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Q. Gao, B. Yuan, A. Chess, Convergent projections of Drosophila olfactory neurons to specific glomeruli in the antennal lobe. Nat. Neurosci. 3(8), 780–785 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A.F. Silbering, C.G. Galizia, Processing of odor mixtures in the Drosophila antennal lobe reveals both global inhibition and glomerulus-specific interactions. J. Neurosci. 27(44), 11966–11977 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    B. Hansson, Olfaction in lepidoptera. Experientia 51(11), 1003–1027 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    N. Strausfeld, L. Hansen, Y. Li, R. Gomez, K. Ito, Evolution, discovery, and interpretations of arthropod mushroom bodies. Learn. Mem. 5(1–2), 11–37 (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. Zhou, D. Chen, Binaral rivalry between the nostrils and in the cortex. Curr. Biol. 19(18), 1561–1565 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. Morrison, R. Costanzo, Morphology of olfactory epithelium in humans and other vertebrates. Microsc. Res. Tech. 23(1), 49–61 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. Hotelling, Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. J. Educ. Psychol. 24, 417–441 (1933)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    C.E. Shannon, A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379–423 (1948)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Vergara, S. Vembu, T. Ayhan, M.A. Ryan, M.L. Homer, R. Huerta, Chemical gas sensor drift compensation using classifier ensembles. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 166167, 320–329 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Figaro USA, Inc., Accesssed 15 Feb 2019
  15. 15.
    A. Setkus, A. Olekas, D. Senuliene, M. Falasconi, M. Pardo, G. Sberveglieri, Featuring of odor by metal oxide sensor response to varying gas mixture, in Olfaction and Electronic Nose, Proceedings, of AIP Conference Proceedings, ed. by M. Pardo, G. Sberveglieri, vol. 1137 (2009), pp. 202–205Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    K. Pearson, On lines and planes of closest to systems of points in space. Philos. Mag. 2(6), 559–572 (1901)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    V. Vapnik, The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory (Springer, N.Y., 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. Haykin, Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation (Prentice Hall, 1998)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    C.C. Chang, C.J. Lin, LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines, v2.85, software available at Accessed 15 Feb 2019
  20. 20.
    M.K. Muezzinoglu, A. Vergara, R. Huerta, T. Nowotny, N. Rulkov, H.D.I. Abarbanel, A.I. Selverston, M.I. Rabinovich, Artificial olfactory brain for mixture identification, in NIPS ed by D. Koller, D. Schuurmans, Y. Bengio, L. Bottou, (MIT Press, 2009), pp. 1121–1128Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    T. Ayhan, K. Muezzinoglu, M.E. Yalcin, Cellular neural network based artificial antennal lobe, in Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Workshop on Cellular Neural Networks and their Applications (CNNA 2010) (2010), pp. 1–6Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    T. Ayhan, M.E. Yalcin, An application of small-world cellular neural networks on odor classification. Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 22(1), 1–12 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    F. Gollas, C. Niederhoefer, R. Tetzlaff, Toward an autonomous platform for spatio-temporal EEG signal analysis based on cellular nonlinear networks. Int. J. Circuit Theory Appl. 36(10), 623–639 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    S. Sanei, J. Chambers, EEG Signal Processing (Wiley-Interscience, 2007)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    EMOTIV, Accessed 15 Feb 2019

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Müştak E. Yalçın
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tuba Ayhan
    • 1
  • Ramazan Yeniçeri
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Electronics and Telecommunications EngineeringIstanbul Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Aeronautical EngineeringIstanbul Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations