Advertisement

Optimization-Based Hybrid Congestion Alleviation

  • Hayder Al-KashoashEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Springer Theses book series (Springer Theses)

Abstract

In general, two main methods are used to solve and alleviate congestion in WSNs and 6LoWPAN networks: rate adaptation (traffic control) and traffic engineering, i.e. selection of an alternate non-congested path (resource control) to forward packets to destination nodes [1, 2]. In traffic control, the sending rate of the source node is reduced to a specific value such that the number of injected packets into the network is reduced and therefore, congestion is alleviated. However, for time-critical and delay-constrained application (e.g. medical applications and fire detection applications), reducing the data rate is not desirable and impractical. In the resource control method, packets are forwarded to destination node through alternative non-congested paths without adjusting the sending rate. However, sometimes non-congested paths are not available and therefore, congestion cannot be avoided. Thus, it is very important to combine the above two strategies into a hybrid scheme and utilize the positive aspects of using both traffic control and resource control. In such case, the resource control strategy is firstly used for searching non-congested paths. If they are not available, then the sending rate is reduced by applying the traffic control strategy. To the best of our knowledge, no existing congestion control mechanism in 6LoWPAN networks combines both strategies to solve the congestion problem.

References

  1. 1.
    Ghaffari A (2015) Congestion control mechanisms in wireless sensor networks: a survey. J Netw Comput Appl 52:101–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kafi MA, Djenouri D, Ben-Othman J, Badache N (2014) Congestion control protocols in wireless sensor networks: a survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 16(3):1369–1390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Winter T, Thubert P, Brandt A, Hui J, Kelsey R (2012) RPL: IPv6 routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks. IETF, RFC 6550Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kelly FP, Maulloo AK, Tan DK (1998) Rate control for communication networks: shadow prices, proportional fairness and stability. J Oper Res Soc 49(3):237–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kuo Y, Yang T, Huang G-W (2008) The use of grey relational analysis in solving multiple attribute decision-making problems. Comput Ind Eng 55(1):80–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dunkels A, Grönvall B, Voigt T (2004) Contiki - a lightweight and flexible operating system for tiny networked sensors. In: Proceedings of 29th annual IEEE international conference on local computer networks. IEEE, pp 455–462Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Osterlind F, Dunkels A, Eriksson J, Finne N, Voigt T (2006) Cross-level sensor network simulation with COOJA. In: Proceedings of 31st IEEE conference on local computer networks. IEEE, pp 641–648Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Al-Kashoash HAA, Al-Nidawi Y, Kemp AH (2016) Congestion-aware RPL for 6LoWPAN networks. In: Proceedings of wireless telecommunications symposium (WTS 2016). IEEE, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vasseur J-P, Kim M, Pister K, Dejean N, Barthel D (2012) Routing metrics used for path calculation in low-power and lossy networks. RFC 6551Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gnawali O, Levis P (2010) The ETX objective function for RPL. Internet draft: draft-gnawali-roll-etxof-00Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thubert P (2012) Objective function zero for the routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks (RPL). RFC 6552Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim H-S, Paek J, Bahk S (2015) QU-RPL: queue utilization based RPL for load balancing in large scale industrial applications. In: Proceedings of 12th annual IEEE international conference on sensing, communication, and networking (SECON). IEEE, pp 265–273Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu X, Guo J, Bhatti G, Orlik P, Parsons K (2013) Load balanced routing for low power and lossy networks. In: Proceedings of wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC). IEEE, pp 2238–2243Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guo J, Liu X, Bhatti G, Orlik P, Parsons K (2013) Load balanced routing for low power and lossy networks, 21 January 2013, US Patent Application 13/746,173Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sztrik J (2012) Basic queueing theory. University of Debrecen, Faculty of InformaticsGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ju-Long D (1982) Control problems of grey systems. Syst Control Lett 1(5):288–294MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu S, Forrest JYL (2010) Grey systems: theory and applications. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kafi MA, Djenouri D, Othman JB, Ouadjaout A, Badache N (2014) Congestion detection strategies in wireless sensor networks: a comparative study with testbed experiments. Procedia Comput Sci 37:168–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Verma R, Singh NP (2013) GRA based network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks. Wirel Pers Commun 72(2):1437–1452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang Y-M, Luo Y (2010) Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making. Math Comput Model 51(1):1–12MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Srikant R, Ying L (2013) Communication networks: an optimization, control, and stochastic networks perspective. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang L, Kuo G-S (2013) Mathematical modeling for network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks—a tutorial. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 15(1):271–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Huaizhou S, Prasad RV, Onur E, Niemegeers I (2014) Fairness in wireless networks: issues, measures and challenges. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 16(1):5–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bertsekas DP (1999) Nonlinear programming. Athena Scientific, BelmontGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Srikant R (2012) The mathematics of internet congestion control. Springer Science and Business Media, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Palomar DP, Chiang M (2006) A tutorial on decomposition methods for network utility maximization. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 24(8):1439–1451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tychogiorgos G, Leung KK (2014) Optimization-based resource allocation in communication networks. Comput Netw 66:32–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Brown RG (2004) Smoothing, forecasting and prediction of discrete time series. Courier Corporation, ChelmsfordGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Michopoulos V, Guan L, Oikonomou G, Phillips I (2012) DCCC6: duty cycle-aware congestion control for 6LoWPAN networks. In: Proceedings of international conference on pervasive computing and communications workshops (PERCOM workshops). IEEE, pp 278–283Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kim H-S, Kim H, Paek J, Bahk S (2016) Load balancing under heavy traffic in RPL routing protocol for low power and lossy networks. IEEE Trans Mob ComputGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dunkels A, Eriksson J, Finne N, Tsiftes N (2011) Powertrace: network-level power profiling for low-power wireless networks. Swedish Institute of Computer Science (SICS). Technical reportGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zawodniok M, Jagannathan S (2007) Predictive congestion control protocol for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 6(11):3955–3963CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Technical Institute/QurnaSouthern Technical UniversityBasraIraq

Personalised recommendations