Advertisement

Distributed Data Protection and Liability on Blockchains

  • Alexandra GiannopoulouEmail author
  • Valeria Ferrari
Conference paper
  • 683 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11551)

Abstract

Blockchains and the GDPR pursue similar objectives where they seek to grant users greater control over their personal data. While the latter pursues this goal by imposing duties of care to centralized controllers and collectors of data, blockchains go a step beyond by trying to eliminate these stakeholders and the need to trust them. Nevertheless, the rules set out by the GDPR apply whenever personal data are at stake, and various actors of the blockchain ecosystem risk liability for controlling of processing data in violation of privacy requirements. A possible solution is to re-contextualize the concepts of data controlling and responsibility, as framed by the GDPR, in light of blockchains’ enhanced individual autonomy. In this paper, we set the framework for a further inquiry on the role of users as both data subjects and data controllers of distributed ledgers.

Keywords

Blockchain Decentralization Data protection 

References

  1. 1.
    Article 29 Working Party, Opinion 04/2014 on Anonymisation Techniques, 0829/14/ENGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Article 29 Working Party, Opinion 4/2007 on the Concept of Personal Data, 01248/07/EN WP136Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dingle, S.: In Math We Trust: Bitcoin, Cryptocurrency and the Journey to Being Your Own Bank. Tracey McDonald Publishers, Bryanston (2018)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Finck, M.: Blockchains and data protection in the European Union. EDPL 4(1), 17–35 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.21552/edpl/2018/1/6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ibanez, L.D., O’Hara, K., Simperl, E.: On Blockchains and the General Data Protection Regulation (2018). https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/422879
  6. 6.
    Nakamoto, S.: Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System (2009). https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
  7. 7.
    Narayanan, A., Clark, J.: Bitcoin’s academic pedigree. Commun. ACM 60(12), 36–45 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1145/3132259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Purtova, N.: The law of everything. Broad concept of personal data and future of EU data protection law. Law, Innov. Technol. 10(1), 40–81 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2018.1452176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schmelz, D., Fischer, G., Niemeier, P., Zhu, L., Grechenig, T.: Towards using public blockchain in information-centric networks: challenges imposed by the European Union’s general data protection regulation. In: Proceedings of 2018 1st IEEE International Conference on Hot Information-Centric Networking (HotICN 2018), pp. 223–228 (2018)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wright, A., De Filippi, P.: Decentralized Blockchain Technology and the Rise of Lex Cryptographia (2015).  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2580664
  11. 11.
    Wright, A., De Filippi, P.: Blockchain and the Law: The Rule of Code. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2018)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zetzsche, D.A., Buckley, R.P., Arner, D.W.: The distributed liability of distributed ledgers: legal risks of blockchain, University of New South Wales Law Research Series. Law Working Paper Series, Number 2017-007 (2017). http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3018214

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Blockchain and Society Policy Lab, IViRUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations