Advertisement

Grief as a Psychological Object of Study

  • Caroline PearceEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter critically reviews the literature on grief and bereavement examining how grief became an object of psychological study. The review moves chronologically beginning in 1917 with Sigmund Freud’s essay ‘Mourning and Melancholia’ up to present-day debates concerning ‘complicated grief’ and ‘prolonged grief disorder.’ In this chapter Pearce argues that the dominance of psychological studies into grief has transformed grief into a problem of the individual psyche, necessitating the creation of bereavement counselling and therapies. The chapter examines the type of assumed subject on which the psychological view rests, questioning its validity. In conclusion the chapter reviews social theories of grief that have sought to describe the ways in which grief is socially shaped and constructed.

References

  1. Archer, John. 1999. The Nature of Grief: The Evolution and Psychology of Reactions to Loss. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Árnason, Arnar. 2000. “Biography, Bereavement, Story.” Mortality 5 (2): 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ———. 2001. “Experts of the Ordinary: Bereavement Counselling in Britain.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 7 (2): 299–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ———. 2007. “‘Fall Apart and Put Yourself Together Again’: The Anthropology of Death and Bereavement Counselling in Britain.” Mortality 12 (1): 48–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ———. 2012. “Individuals and Relationships: On the Possibilities and Impossibilities of Presence.” In Emotion, Identity and Death, edited by Douglas Davies and Chang-Won Park, 59–70. Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  6. Árnason, Arnar, and Sigurjón Baldur Hafsteinsson. 2003. “The Revival of Death: Expression, Expertise and Governmentality.” British Journal of Sociology 54 (1): 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ———. 2018. Death and Governmentality in Iceland: Neo-Liberalism, Grief and the Nation-Form. Reykjavík: University of Iceland Press.Google Scholar
  8. Balk, David E. 2007. “A Modest Proposal About Bereavement and Recovery.” Death Studies 32 (1): 84–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bonanno, George A. 2004. “Loss, Trauma, and Human Resilience: Have We Underestimated the Human Capacity to Thrive After Extremely Aversive Events?” American Psychologist 59 (1): 20–28.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 2009. The Other Side of Sadness: What the New Science of Bereavement Tells Us About Life After Loss. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 2016. “Resilience in the Face of Potential Trauma.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 14 (3): 135–138.Google Scholar
  12. Bonanno, George A., and Dacher Keltner. 1997. “Facial Expressions of Emotion and the Course of Conjugal Bereavement.” Journal of Abnormal Psychology 106 (1): 126–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bowlby, John. 1979. The Making and Breaking of Affectional Bonds. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 1980. Attachment and Loss Volume III: Loss, Sadness and Depression. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  15. Butler, Judith. 2004. Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  16. Charmaz, Kathy, and Melinda J. Milligan. 2006. “Grief.” In The Handbook of the Sociology of Emotions, edited by Jan Stets and Jonathan H. Turner, 516–538. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Darwin, Charles. 1872. The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. London: John Murray.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davies, Douglas J. 2005. A Brief History of Death. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Doka, Ken J. (ed.). 1989. Disenfranchised Grief: Recognising Hidden Sorrow. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  20. Durkheim, Emile. 1915. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  21. Dying Matters. 2014. Public Attitudes to Bereavement Survey. London: ComRes.Google Scholar
  22. Eliot, Thomas D. 1932. “The Bereaved Family.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 160: 184–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Engel, George. 1961. “Is Grief a Disease?” Psychosomatic Medicine 23: 18–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Field, Nigel P., and Charles Filanosky. 2009. “Continuing Bonds, Risk Factors for Complicated Grief, and Adjustment to Bereavement.” Death Studies 34 (1): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Foote, Catherine E., and Arthur W. Frank. 1999. “Foucault and Therapy: The Disciplining of Grief.” In Reading Foucault for Social Work, edited by Adrienne Chambon, Allan Irving, and Laura Epstein, 157–188. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Footman, Els Ballhausen. 1998. “The Loss Adjusters.” Mortality 3 (3): 291–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fowlkes, Martha R. 1990. “The Social Regulation of Grief.” Sociological Forum 5 (4): 635–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Freud, Sigmund. 1917. “Mourning and Melancholia.” In The Penguin Freud Reader, edited by Adam Philips, 310–326. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  29. Fulconer, D. 1942. The Adjustive Behavior of Some Recently Bereaved Spouses. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
  30. Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  31. Gorer, Geoffrey. 1965. Death, Grief and Mourning in Contemporary Britain. London: Cresset Press.Google Scholar
  32. Granek, Leeat. 2013. “Disciplinary Wounds: Has Grief Become the Identified Patient for a Field Gone Awry?” Journal of Loss and Trauma 18 (3): 275–288.Google Scholar
  33. Groopman, Jerome. 2004. “The Grief Industry.” The New Yorker, January.Google Scholar
  34. Gündel, Harald, Mary-Frances O’Connor, Lindsey Littrell, Carolyn Fort, and Richard D. Lane. 2003. “Functional Neuroanatomy of Grief: An fMRI Study.” The American Journal of Psychiatry 160 (11): 1946–1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hall, Christopher. 2014. “Bereavement Theory: Recent Developments in Our Understanding of Grief and Bereavement.” Bereavement Care 33 (1): 7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Harris, Darcy. 2010. “Oppression of the Bereaved: A Critical Analysis of Grief in Western Society.” Omega 60 (3): 241–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Harrison, Lucy, and Richard Harrington. 2001. “Adolescents’ Bereavement Experiences: Prevalence, Association with Depressive Symptoms, and Use of Services.” Journal of Adolescence 24 (2): 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Horowitz, Mardi J., Bryna Siegel, Are Holen, George A. Bonanno, Constance Milbrath, and Charles H. Stinson. 1997. “Diagnostic Criteria for Complicated Grief Disorder.” The American Journal of Psychiatry 154 (7): 904–910.Google Scholar
  39. Jakoby, Nina R. 2012. “Grief as a Social Emotion: Theoretical Perspectives.” Death Studies 36 (8): 679–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jalland, Pat. 2010. Death in War and Peace: Loss and Grief in England 1914–1970. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Jordan, John R., and Robert A. Neimeyer. 2003. “Does Grief Counseling Work?” Death Studies 27 (9): 765–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. King, Barbara J. 2013. How Animals Grieve. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Klass, Dennis. 2014. “Grief, Consolation, and Religions: A Conceptual Framework.” Omega 69 (1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Klass, Dennis, Phyllis R. Silverman, and Steven L. Nickman (eds.). 1996. Continuing Bonds: New Understandings of Grief. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  45. Klein, Melanie. 1975 [1940]. “Mourning and Its Relation to Manic-Depressive States.” In Love, Guilt and Reparation and Other Works 1921–1945: The Writings of Melanie Klein Volume I, 344–369. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  46. Konisberg, R. D. 2011. The Truth About Grief: The Myth of Its Five Stages and the New Science of Loss. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  47. Kübler-Ross, Elizabeth. 1970. On Death and Dying. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  48. Larson, Dale G., and William T. Hoyt. 2009. “Grief Counselling Efficacy: What Have We Learned?” Bereavement Care 28 (3): 14–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lindemann, Eric. 1944. Beyond Grief: Studies in Crisis Intervention. New York: Aronson.Google Scholar
  50. Lofland, Lyn H. 1985. “The Social Shaping of Emotion: The Case of Grief.” Symbolic Interaction 8 (2): 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mclaren, Jan. 1998. “A New Understanding of Grief: A Counsellor’s Perspective.” Mortality 3 (3): 275–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. National Council for Palliative Care. 2014. Life After Death. London: NCPC.Google Scholar
  53. Neimeyer, Robert A. 2005. “Grief, Loss, and the Quest for Meaning: Narrative Contributions to Bereavement Care.” Bereavement Care 24 (2): 27–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Neimeyer, Robert A., Laurie A. Burke, Michael M. Mackay, and Jessica G. van Dyke Stringer. 2010. “Grief Therapy and the Reconstruction of Meaning: From Principles to Practice.” Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy 40 (2): 73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Neimeyer, Robert A., Dennis Klass, and Michael Robert. 2014. “A Social Constructionist Account of Grief: Loss and the Narration of Meaning.” Death Studies 38 (8): 485–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. O’Connor, Mary-Frances. 2005. “Bereavement and the Brain: Invitation to a Conversation Between Bereavement Researchers and Neuroscientists.” Death Studies 29 (10): 905–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. ———. 2012. “Immunological and Neuroimaging Biomarkers of Complicated Grief.” Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience 14 (2): 141–148.Google Scholar
  58. O’Connor, Mary-Frances, David K. Wellisch, Annette L. Stanton, Naomi I. Eisenberger, Michael R. Irwin, and Matthew D. Lieberman. 2008. “Craving Love? Enduring Grief Activates Brain’s Reward Center.” NeuroImage 42 (2): 969–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Parkes, Colin Murray. 1972. Bereavement: Studies of Grief in Adult Life. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  60. ———. 2006. Love and Loss: The Roots of Grief and Its Complications. Hove: East.Google Scholar
  61. Parkes, Colin Murray, and Robert S. Weiss. 1983. Recovery from Bereavement. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  62. Prigerson, Holly G., E. Frank, S. V. Kasl, C. F. Reynolds, B. Anderson, G. S. Zubenko, and D. J. Kupfer. 1995. “Complicated Grief and Bereavement-Related Depression as Distinct Disorders: Preliminary Empirical Validation in Elderly Bereaved Spouses.” The American Journal of Psychiatry 152 (1): 22–30.Google Scholar
  63. Prigerson, Holly G., A. J. Bierhals, S. V. Kasl, C. F. Reynolds, Katherine Shear, J. T. Newsom, and S. Jacobs. 1996. “Complicated Grief as a Disorder Distinct from Bereavement-Related Depression and Anxiety: A Replication Study.” The American Journal of Psychiatry 153 (11): 1484–1486.Google Scholar
  64. Richardson, Virginia E., Kate M. Bennett, Deborah Carr, Stephen Gallagher, Jinhyun Kim, and Noelle Fields. 2015. “How Does Bereavement Get Under the Skin? The Effects of Late-Life Spousal Loss on Cortisol Levels.” The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 70 (3): 341–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Robson, Patricia, and Tony Walter. 2013. “Hierarchies of Loss: A Critique of Disenfranchised Grief.” Omega 66 (2): 97–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rodgers, Beth L., and Kathleen V. Cowles. 1991. “The Concept of Grief: An Analysis of Classical and Contemporary Thought.” Death Studies 15: 443–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rose, Nikolas. 1985. The Psychological Complex: Psychology, Politics and Society in England, 1869–1939. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  68. ———. 1989. Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self. London: Free Association Press.Google Scholar
  69. ———. 1998. Inventing Our Selves: Psychology, Power and Personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Rosenblatt, Paul C. 1993. “Grief: The Social Context of Private Feelings.” In Handbook of Bereavement: Theory, Research, and Intervention, edited by Margaret S. Stroebe, Wolfgang Stroebe, and Robert O. Hansson, 102–111. Washington: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  71. ———. 2008. “Grief Across Cultures: A Review and Research Agenda.” In Handbook of Bereavement Research and Practice: Advances in Theory and Intervention, edited by Margaret S. Stroebe, Wolfgang Stroebe, and Robert O. Hansson, 207–222. Washington: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  72. Rosenblatt, Paul C., and Ted Bowman. 2013. “Alternative Approaches to Conceptualizing Grief: A Conversation.” Bereavement Care 32 (2): 82–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rosenblatt, Paul C., R. Patricia Walsh, and Douglas A. Jackson. 1976. Grief and Mourning in Cross-Cultural Perspective. New York: Human Relations Area Files.Google Scholar
  74. Rothaupt, Jeanne W., and Kent Becker. 2007. “A Literature Review of Western Bereavement Theory: From Decathecting to Continuing Bonds.” The Family Journal 15 (1): 6–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sandler, Irwin N., Sharlene A. Wolchik, and Tim S. Ayers. 2008. “Resilience Rather Than Recovery: A Contextual Framework on Adaptation Following Bereavement.” Death Studies 32 (1): 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sbarra, David A., and Cindy Hazan. 2008. “Coregulation, Dysregulation, Self-Regulation: An Integrative Analysis and Empirical Agenda for Understanding Adult Attachment, Separation, Loss, and Recovery.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 12 (2): 141–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Schut, Henk. 2010. “Grief Counselling Efficacy: Have We Learned Enough?” Bereavement Care 29 (1): 8–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. SECOB Project Research Group. 2013. Socio-Economic Costs of Bereavement in Scotland: Main Study Report. March, Aberdeen: SECOB.Google Scholar
  79. Shear, M. Katherine. 2012 “Grief and Mourning Gone Awry: Pathway and Course of Complicated Grief”, Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 14 (2): 119–128.Google Scholar
  80. Small, Neil. 2001. “Theories of Grief: A Critical Review.” In Grief, Mourning and Death Ritual, edited by Jenny Hockey, Jeanne Katz, and Neil Small, 19–48. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Small, Neil, and Jenny Hockey. 2001. “Discourse into Practice: The Production of Bereavement Care.” In Grief, Mourning and Death Ritual, edited by Jenny Hockey, Jeanne Katz, and Neil Small, 97–124. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Stearns, Peter N., and Mark Knapp. 1996. “Historical Perspectives on Grief.” In The Emotions: Social, Cultural and Biological Dimensions, edited by Ron Harre and W. Gerrod Parrott, 132–150. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  83. Stephen, Audrey I., Colin Macduff, Dennis J. Petrie, Fu-Min Tseng, Henk Schut, Silje Skår, Anne Corden, John Birrell, Shaolin Wang, Cate Newsom, and Stewart Wilson. 2014. “The Economic Cost of Bereavement in Scotland.” Death Studies 39 (1–5): 151–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Stroebe, Margaret. 1997. “From Mourning and Melancholia to Bereavement and Biography: An Assessment of Walter’s New Model of Grief.” Mortality 2 (3): 255–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Stroebe, Margaret, and Henk Schut. 1999. “The Dual Process Model of Coping with Bereavement: Rationale and Description.” Death Studies 23 (3): 197–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. ———. 2005. “To Continue or Relinquish Bonds: A Review of Consequences for the Bereaved.” Death Studies 29 (6): 477–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Stroebe, Margaret, and Wolfgang Stroebe. 1991. “Does ‘grief work’ work?” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 59 (3): 479–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Stroebe, Margaret, Henk Schut, and Wolfgang Stroebe. 2007. “Health Outcomes of Bereavement.” Lancet 370 (9603): 1960–1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Stroebe, Margaret, Henk Schut, and Jan van den Bout (eds.). 2013. Complicated Grief: Scientific Foundations for Health Care Professionals. Hove: East.Google Scholar
  90. Valentine, Christine. 2008. Bereavement Narratives: Continuing Bonds in the 21st Century. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wakefield, Jerome C. 2013. “The DSM-5 Debate over the Bereavement Exclusion: Psychiatric Diagnosis and the Future of Empirically Supported Treatment.” Clinical Psychology Review 33 (7): 825–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Waller, Amy, Heidi Turon, Elise Mansfield, Katherine Clark, Bree Hobden, and Rob Sanson-Fisher. 2016. “Assisting the Bereaved: A Systematic Review of the Evidence for Grief Counselling.” Palliative Medicine 30 (2): 132–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Walter, Tony. 1996. “A New Model of Grief: Bereavement and Biography.” Mortality 1 (1): 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. ———. 1999. On Bereavement: The Culture of Grief. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  95. ———. 2006. “What Is Complicated Grief? A Social Constructionist Perspective.” Omega 52 (1): 71–79.Google Scholar
  96. ———. 2007. “Modern Grief, Postmodern Grief.” International Review of Sociology 17 (1): 123–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. ———. 2010. “Grief and Culture: A Checklist.” Bereavement Care 29 (2): 5–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Wambach, Julie Ann. 1985. “The Grief Process as a Social Construct.” Omega 16 (3): 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Wittkowski, Joachim, Ken J. Doka, Robert A. Neimeyer, and Michael Vallerga. 2015. “Publication Trends in Thanatology: An Analysis of Leading Journals.” Death Studies 39 (8): 453–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Worden, J. William. 1991. Grief Counselling and Grief Therapy: A Handbook for the Mental Health Practitioner, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  101. Wortman, Camille B., and Roxane Cohen Silver. 1989. “The Myths of Coping with Loss.” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 57 (3): 349–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Zisook, Sidney, and Katherine Shear. 2009. “Grief and Bereavement: What Psychiatrists Need to Know.” World Psychiatry 8 (2): 67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.King’s College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations