Advertisement

A Dynamic Service Adaptation Algorithm for Seamless Integration of Cloud Infrastructure and Edge Devices

  • Liu YangEmail author
  • Yi Li
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11434)

Abstract

Service-oriented cloud-edge integration is a promising approach for the big IoT stream processing effectively in a distributed manner. Dynamic adaptation of cloud and edge service is of key importance to enable the seamless integration of cloud infrastructure and edge equipment. There exist several challenges, such as grasping the right moment and coping incomplete matching. Targeting at the challenges and based on our previous proactive data service model, the paper proposes a service adaptation approach, called as ALES, to enable the dynamic cloud-edge integration. The main contributions include: transforming the service adaptation problem into the improved maximal weight matching model in a dynamic bipartite graph. The M/M/c/∞ model in the queuing theory is modified to optimize the Kuhn-Munkres algorithm to minimize the average response time of the request of edge service. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is demonstrated by examining real cases of Chinese State Power Grid. Experimental results verify the effectiveness and efficiency of our approach.

Keywords

Cloud-edge integration Cloud service Edge service Service adapting 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work was supported in part by a grant from the Technology Project of State Grid, “Research and Application of Key Technology in Big Data Analysis of Power Quality”, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61672042), the Program for Youth Backbone Individual, and the Beijing Municipal Party Committee Organization Department (Grant No. 2015000020124G024).

References

  1. 1.
    He, B., Yang, M., Guo, Z., et al.: Comet: batched stream processing for data intensive distributed computing. In: ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing, pp. 63–74. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahmed, A., Ahmed, E.: A survey on mobile edge computing. In: Proceeding of the 10th IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Control, Coimbatore, India, 7–8 January 2016, pp. 1–8 (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lopez, P.G., Montresor, A., Epema, D., et al.: Edge-centric computing: vision and challenges. ACM SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 45(5), 37–42 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huhns, M.N., Singh, M.P.: Service-oriented computing: key concepts and principles. IEEE Internet Comput. 9(1), 75–81 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Han, Y., Liu, C., Su, S., et al.: A proactive service model facilitating stream data fusion and correlation. Int. J. Web Serv. Res. 14(3), 1–16 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cheng, B., Zhu, D., Zhao, S., et al.: Situation-aware IoT services coordination platform using event driven SOA paradigm. IEEE Trans. Netw. Serv. Manag. 13(2), 349–361 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ryden, M., Oh, K., Chandra, A., et al.: Nebula: distributed edge cloud for data intensive computing. In: IEEE International Conference on Cloud Engineering. IEEE, pp. 57–66 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang, X., Yang, L.T., Xie, X., et al.: A cloud-edge computing framework for cyber-physical-social services. IEEE Commun. Mag. 55(11), 80–85 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xiao, B., Rahmani, R., Li, Y., et al.: Edge-based interoperable service-driven information distribution for intelligent pervasive services. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 40, 359–381 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Xu, X., Huang, S., Feagan, L., et al.: EAaaS: edge analytics as a service. In: IEEE International Conference on Web Services. IEEE, pp. 349–356 (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang, S., Liu, C., Han, Y., et al.: Seamless integration of cloud and edge with a service-based approach. In: IEEE International Conference on Web Services. IEEE (2018) (in press)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Plaxton, C.G.: Fast scheduling of weighted unit jobs with release times and deadlines. In: Aceto, L., et al. (eds.) ICALP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5125, pp. 222–233. Springer, Heidelberg (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70575-8_19CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Azad, A., Buluc, A., Pothen, A.: A parallel tree grafting algorithm for maximum cardinality matching in bipartite graphs. In: Proceedings of Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, pp. 1075–1084 (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Riesen, K., Bunke, H.: Approximate graph edit distance computation by means of bipartite graph matching. Image Vis. Comput. 27(7), 950–959 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Varghese, B., Wang, N., Li, J., et al.: Edge-as-a-Service: Towards Distributed Cloud Architectures (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bucchiarone, A., Marconi, A., Pistore, M., et al.: Dynamic adaptation of fragment-based and context-aware business processes. In: IEEE International Conference on Web Services. IEEE, pp. 33–41 (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bucchiarone, A., Marconi, A., Pistore, M., et al.: Domain objects for continuous context-aware adaptation of service-based systems. IEEE International Conference on Web Services. IEEE, pp. 571–578 (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Alférez, G.H., Pelechano, V., Mazo, R., et al.: Dynamic adaptation of service compositions with variability models. J. Syst. Softw. 91(5), 24–47 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Grid Corporation of ChinaBeijingChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Advanced Power Transmission TechnologyGlobal Energy Interconnection Research Institute (GEIRI)BeijingChina

Personalised recommendations