Advertisement

Photocatalysts for Indoor Air Pollution: A Brief Review

  • Shanmuga Sundar Dhanabalan
  • Sivanantha Raja Avaninathan
  • Saravanan Rajendran
  • Marcos Flores Carrasco
Chapter
Part of the Environmental Chemistry for a Sustainable World book series (ECSW, volume 36)

Abstract

Photocatalysis is one of the fastest growing technologies for the treatment of pollutants, utilizing the mechanism of reaction with the help of light (photo emissions). Photocatalysis has captured broad academic and research interest during the past three decades for its potential of controlling pollution in air and water. Its qualities, such as low cost and high efficiency, have caused researchers all over the world to focus on it and also promoted many industrial applications and much research. Photocatalysis has been used to remove major air pollutants, disinfect water, and oxidize various organic chemicals. In this connection, this chapter considers the properties of the ideal photocatalyst, available photocatalytic materials for air pollution control, common indoor air pollutants and their severe health effects, and purification techniques for indoor air pollution. Furthermore, photocatalytic oxidation techniques for the removal of volatile organic compounds are discussed in detail.

Keywords

Photocatalyst Indoor air pollution Titanium dioxide Photocatalytic oxidation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors (D. Shanmuga Sundar and Marcos Flores Carrasco) wish to thank the Conicyt FONDECYT (Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico) Project No. 3180089 and Millennium Nucleus MULTIMAT for funding and support.

References

  1. Al-Kahtani AA, Almuqati T, Alhokbany N, Ahamad T, Naushad M, Alshehri SM (2018) A clean approach for the reduction of hazardous 4-nitrophenol using gold nanoparticles decorated multiwalled carbon nanotubes. J Clean Prod 191:429–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alonso-Tellez A, Robert D, Keller V, Keller N (2014) H2S photocatalytic oxidation over WO3/TiO2 Hombikat UV100. Environ Sci Pollut Res.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-2329-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Othman ZA, Inamuddin, Naushad M (2011) Adsorption thermodynamics of trichloroacetic acid herbicide on polypyrrole Th(IV) phosphate composite cation-exchanger. Chem Eng J 169:38–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.02.046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alshehri SM, Naushad M, Ahamad T et al (2014) Synthesis, characterization of curcumin based ecofriendly antimicrobial bio-adsorbent for the removal of phenol from aqueous medium. Chem Eng J 254:181–189.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.05.100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andryushina NS, Stroyuk OL (2014) Influence of colloidal graphene oxide on photocatalytic activity of nanocrystalline TiO2 in gas-phase ethanol and benzene oxidation. Appl Catal B Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.11.044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anpo M (2000) Applications of titanium oxide photocatalysts and unique second-generation TiO2 photocatalysts able to operate under visible light irradiation for the reduction of environmental toxins on a global scale. Stud Surf Sci Catal.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2991(00)80952-0Google Scholar
  7. Antonello A, Soliveri G, Meroni D et al (2014) Photocatalytic remediation of indoor pollution by transparent TiO2 films. Catal Today.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2013.12.033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bahri M, Haghighat F (2014) Plasma-based indoor air cleaning technologies: the state of the art-review. Clean (Weinh) 42(12):1667–1680Google Scholar
  9. Banisharif A, Khodadadi AA, Mortazavi Y et al (2015) Highly active Fe2O3-doped TiO2 photocatalyst for degradation of trichloroethylene in air under UV and visible light irradiation: experimental and computational studies. Appl Catal B Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.10.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bavykin DV, Passoni L, Walsh FC (2013) Hierarchical tube-in-tube structures prepared by electrophoretic deposition of nanostructured titanates into a TiO2 nanotube array. Chem Commun.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cc43264eCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bennett A (2009) Strategies and technologies: controlling indoor air quality. Filtr Sep.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-1882(09)70155-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bernstein JA, Alexis N, Bacchus H et al (2008) The health effects of non-industrial indoor air pollution. J Allergy Clin Immunol.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2007.10.045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Berry D, Mainelis G, Fennell D (2007) Effect of an ionic air cleaner on indoor/outdoor particle ratios in a residential environment. Aerosol Sci Technol 41:315–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bianchi CL, Gatto S, Pirola C et al (2014) Photocatalytic degradation of acetone, acetaldehyde and toluene in gas-phase: comparison between nano and micro-sized TiO2. Appl Catal B Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.02.047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bickley RI, Stone FS (1973) Photoadsorption and photocatalysis at rutile surfaces. I. Photoadsorption of oxygen. J Catal.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9517(73)90310-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Boeniger MF (1995) Use of ozone generating devices to improve indoor air quality. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15428119591016827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Calderón MA, Linneberg A, Kleine-Tebbe J et al (2015) Respiratory allergy caused by house dust mites: what do we really know? J Allergy Clin Immunol 136(1):38–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cant NW, Cole JR (1992) Photocatalysis of the reaction between ammonia and nitric oxide on TiO2 surfaces. J Catal.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9517(92)90231-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cao S, Low J, Yu J, Jaroniec M (2015) Polymeric photocatalysts based on graphitic carbon nitride. Adv Mater.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201500033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Challoner A, Gill L (2014) Indoor/outdoor air pollution relationships in ten commercial buildings: PM 2.5 and NO2. Build Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.05.032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chávez-Valdez A, Herrmann M, Boccaccini AR (2012) Alternating current electrophoretic deposition (EPD) of TiO2 nanoparticles in aqueous suspensions. J Colloid Interface Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2012.02.054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chen HW, Liang CP, Huang HS et al (2011) Electrophoretic deposition of mesoporous TiO2 nanoparticles consisting of primary anatase nanocrystallites on a plastic substrate for flexible dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem Commun.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c1cc12514aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chen Y, Cao X, Gao B, Lin B (2013) A facile approach to synthesize N-doped and oxygen-deficient TiO2 with high visible-light activity for benzene decomposition. Mater Lett.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2012.12.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chen K, Zhu L, Yang K (2015a) Tricrystalline TiO2 with enhanced photocatalytic activity and durability for removing volatile organic compounds from indoor air. J Environ Sci (China).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2014.10.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chen YC, Katsumata KI, Chiu YH et al (2015b) ZnO-graphene composites as practical photocatalysts for gaseous acetaldehyde degradation and electrolytic water oxidation. Appl Catal A Gen.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2014.10.055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Clements-Croome DJ, Awbi HB, Bakó-Biró Z et al (2008) Ventilation rates in schools. Build Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.03.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Crook B, Burton NC (2010) Indoor moulds, sick building syndrome and building related illness. Fungal Biol Rev 24(3-4):106–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dallongeville A, Le Cann P, Zmirou-Navier D et al (2015) Concentration and determinants of molds and allergens in indoor air and house dust of French dwellings. Sci Total Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.06.039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Demeestere K, Dewulf J, Van Langenhove H (2007) Heterogeneous photocatalysis as an advanced oxidation process for the abatement of chlorinated, monocyclic aromatic and sulfurous volatile organic compounds in air: state of the art. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 37(6):489–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dunnill CWH, Aiken ZA, Pratten J et al (2009) Enhanced photocatalytic activity under visible light in N-doped TiO2 thin films produced by APCVD preparations using t-butylamine as a nitrogen source and their potential for antibacterial films. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2009.07.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Environmental Protection Agency (2009) Residential air cleaners. A summary of available information, 2nd edn. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. doi:EPA 402-F-09-002Google Scholar
  32. Environmental Protection Agency (2014a) Ground level ozone – health effects. EPA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  33. Environmental Protection Agency (2014b) Ozone generators that are sold as air cleaners. www.epa.gov
  34. Environmental Protection Agency (2017) Health risk of radon. US EPA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  35. Esswein EJ, Boeniger MF (1994) Effect of an ozone-generating air-purifying device on reducing concentrations of formaldehyde in air. Appl Occup Environ Hyg.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1047322X.1994.10388285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Fujishima A, Honda K (1972) Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature (Lond) doi:  https://doi.org/10.1038/238037a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fujishima A, Rao TN, Tryk DA (2000) TiO2 photocatalysts and diamond electrodes. Electrochim Acta.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-4686(00)00620-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ge H, Hu D, Li X et al (2015) Removal of low-concentration benzene in indoor air with plasma-MnO2 catalysis system. J Electrost.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elstat.2015.06.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Guo H, Murray F, Lee SC (2003) The development of low volatile organic compound emission house: a case study. Build Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1323(03)00156-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Han Z, Chang VW, Wang X et al (2013) Experimental study on visible-light induced photocatalytic oxidation of gaseous formaldehyde by polyester fiber supported photocatalysts. Chem Eng J.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.12.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. He F, Li J, Li T, Li G (2014) Solvothermal synthesis of mesoporous TiO2: the effect of morphology, size and calcination progress on photocatalytic activity in the degradation of gaseous benzene. Chem Eng J.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.10.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hoffmann MR, Martin ST, Choi W, Bahnemann DW (1995) Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis. Chem Rev.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00033a004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hou WM, Ku Y (2013) Photocatalytic decomposition of gaseous isopropanol in a tubular optical fiber reactor under periodic UV-LED illumination. J Mol Catal A Chem.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2013.03.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hu Y, Song X, Jiang S, Wei C (2015) Enhanced photocatalytic activity of Pt-doped TiO2 for NOx oxidation both under UV and visible light irradiation: a synergistic effect of lattice Pt4+ and surface PtO. Chem Eng J.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.03.135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Huang H, Huang H, Zhang L et al (2015) Enhanced degradation of gaseous benzene under vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) irradiation over TiO2 modified by transition metals. Chem Eng J.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.08.057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hubbard HF, Coleman BK, Sarwar G, Corsi RL (2005) Effects of an ozone-generating air purifier on indoor secondary particles in three residential dwellings. Indoor Air.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2005.00388.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hult EL, Willem H, Price PN et al (2015) Formaldehyde and acetaldehyde exposure mitigation in US residences: in-home measurements of ventilation control and source control. Indoor Air.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hyttinen M, Pasanen P, Kalliokoski P (2006) Removal of ozone on clean, dusty and sooty supply air filters. Atmos Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.09.040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Inoue Y (2009) Photocatalytic water splitting by RuO2-loaded metal oxides and nitrides with d0- and d10-related electronic configurations. Energy Environ Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b816677nCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Juanru H, Mingwei L, Zhong C (2007) Advances in doping of titania photocatalytic catalysts. Ind Catal 15:1–4Google Scholar
  51. Kale MJ, Avanesian T, Christopher P (2014) Direct photocatalysis by plasmonic nanostructures. ACS Catal 4(1):116–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Katsumata KI, Motoyoshi R, Matsushita N, Okada K (2013) Preparation of graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4)/WO3 composites and enhanced visible-light-driven photodegradation of acetaldehyde gas. J Hazard Mater.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.05.058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kete M, Pavlica E, Fresno F et al (2014) Highly active photocatalytic coatings prepared by a low-temperature method. Environ Sci Pollut Res.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3077-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Khan FI, Ghoshal AK (2000) Removal of volatile organic compounds from polluted air. J Loss Prev Process Ind.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-4230(00)00007-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Koistinen K, Kotzias D, Kephalopoulos S et al (2008) The INDEX project: executive summary of a European Union project on indoor air pollutants. Allergy 63(7):810–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kolarik B, Wargocki P, Skorek-Osikowska A, Wisthaler A (2010) The effect of a photocatalytic air purifier on indoor air quality quantified using different measuring methods. Build Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.12.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Krogman KC, Zacharia NS, Grillo DM, Hammond PT (2008) Photocatalytic layer-by-layer coatings for degradation of acutely toxic agents. Chem Mater.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cm703096wCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Le Bechec M, Kinadjian N, Ollis D et al (2015) Comparison of kinetics of acetone, heptane and toluene photocatalytic mineralization over TiO2 microfibers and Quartzel® mats. Appl Catal B Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.05.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lelieveld J, Evans JS, Fnais M et al (2015) The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale. Nature.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Leung DYC (2015) Outdoor-indoor air pollution in urban environment: challenges and opportunity. Front Environ Sci.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2014.00069
  61. Li Y (2016) The “impurity” of indoor air. Indoor Air 26(1):3–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Li Y, Hwang DS, Lee NH, Kim SJ (2005) Synthesis and characterization of carbon-doped titania as an artificial solar light sensitive photocatalyst. Chem Phys Lett.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2005.01.062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Liao Y, Xie C, Liu Y, Huang Q (2013) Enhancement of photocatalytic property of ZnO for gaseous formaldehyde degradation by modifying morphology and crystal defect. J Alloys Compd.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.09.109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Linsebigler AL, Lu GQ, Yates JT (1996) CO photooxidation on TiO2. J Phys Chem.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp952018fCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Litter MI (1999) Heterogeneous photocatalysis: transition metal ions in photocatalytic systems. Appl Catal B Environ 23(2-3):89–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Liu Z, Chen F, Fang P et al (2013) Study of adsorption-assisted photocatalytic oxidation of benzene with TiO2/SiO2 nanocomposites. Appl Catal A Gen.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2012.11.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Lopez L, Daoud WA, Dutta D et al (2013) Effect of substrate on surface morphology and photocatalysis of large-scale TiO2 films. Appl Surf Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.10.156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Lyng NL, Gunnarsen L, Andersen HV (2015) The effect of ventilation on the indoor air concentration of PCB: an intervention study. Build Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.08.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ma CM, Wang W, Ku Y, Jeng FT (2007) Photocatalytic degradation of benzene in air streams in an optical fiber photoreactor. Chem Eng Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.200700138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ma J, He H, Liu F (2015) Effect of Fe on the photocatalytic removal of NOx over visible light responsive Fe/TiO2 catalysts. Appl Catal B Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.05.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Machado LCR, Torchia CB, Lago RM (2006) Floating photocatalysts based on TiO2 supported on high surface area exfoliated vermiculite for water decontamination. Catal Commun.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2005.10.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Madureira J, Paciência I, Rufo JC et al (2015) Assessment and determinants of airborne bacterial and fungal concentrations in different indoor environments: homes, child day-care centres, primary schools and elderly care centres. Atmos Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.03.026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Martínez Vargas DX, Rivera De la Rosa J, Lucio-Ortiz CJ et al (2015) Photocatalytic degradation of trichloroethylene in a continuous annular reactor using Cu-doped TiO2 catalysts by sol-gel synthesis. Appl Catal B Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.05.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Monteiro RAR, Miranda SM, Rodrigues-Silva C et al (2015) Gas phase oxidation of n-decane and PCE by photocatalysis using an annular photoreactor packed with a monolithic catalytic bed coated with P25 and PC500. Appl Catal B Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.10.026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Murcia JJ, Hidalgo MC, Navío JA et al (2013) Cyclohexane photocatalytic oxidation on Pt/TiO2 catalysts. Catal Today.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2012.11.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Nakajima A, Akiyama Y, Yanagida S et al (2009) Preparation and properties of Cu-grafted transparent TiO2-nanosheet thin films. Mater Lett.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2009.05.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Nakata K, Fujishima A (2012) TiO2 photocatalysis: design and applications. J Photochem Photobiol C Photochem Rev.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2012.06.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Naushad M (2014) Surfactant assisted nano-composite cation exchanger: development, characterization and applications for the removal of toxic Pb2+ from aqueous medium. Chem Eng J 235:100–108.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.09.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Nazaroff WW (2013) Four principles for achieving good indoor air quality. Indoor Air 23(5):353–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Nelson HS, Hirsch SR, Ohman JL et al (1988) Recommendations for the use of residential air-cleaning devices in the treatment of allergic respiratory diseases. J Allergy Clin Immunol.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-6749(88)90980-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Niu JL, Tung TCW, Burnett J (2001) Quantification of dust removal and ozone emission of ionizer air-cleaners by chamber testing. J Electrost.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3886(01)00118-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Nizard H, Kosinova ML, Fainer NI et al (2008) Deposition of titanium dioxide from TTIP by plasma enhanced and remote plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition. Surf Coat Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2008.02.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Nolan MG, Pemble ME, Sheel DW, Yates HM (2006) One step process for chemical vapour deposition of titanium dioxide thin films incorporating controlled structure nanoparticles. Thin Solid Films.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2006.07.182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Norhidayah A, Chia-Kuang L, Azhar MK, Nurulwahida S (2013) Indoor air quality and sick building syndrome in three selected buildings. Procedia Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.02.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Ou HH, Lo SL (2007) Photocatalysis of gaseous trichloroethylene (TCE) over TiO2: the effect of oxygen and relative humidity on the generation of dichloroacetyl chloride (DCAC) and phosgene. J Hazard Mater.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.12.039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Park SE, Joo H, Kang JW (2004) Effect of impurities in TiO2 thin films on trichloroethylene conversion. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2004.02.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Paunović K, Maksimović M, Davidović D et al (2005) Max Josef von Pettenkofer – founder of modern hygiene (1818–1901). Srp Arh Celok Lek 133(9-10):450–453Google Scholar
  88. Pham TD, Lee BK (2015) Novel adsorption and photocatalytic oxidation for removal of gaseous toluene by V-doped TiO2/PU under visible light. J Hazard Mater.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.07.048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Pierce WM, Janczewski JN, Roethlisberger B et al (1996) Effectiveness of auxiliary air cleaners in reducing ETS components in offices. ASHRAE J 38:51–57Google Scholar
  90. Poppendieck DG, Rim D, Persily AK (2014) Ultrafine particle removal and ozone generation by in-duct electrostatic precipitators. Environ Sci Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es404884pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Priya DN, Modak JM, Raichur AM (2009) LbL fabricated poly(styrene sulfonate)/TiO2 multilayer thin films for environmental applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am900566nCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Raddaha NS, Cordero-Arias L, Cabanas-Polo S et al (2014) Electrophoretic deposition of chitosan/h-BN and chitosan/h-BN/TiO2 composite coatings on stainless steel (316L) substrates. Materials (Basel).  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma7031814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Ren L, Li Y, Hou J et al (2016) The pivotal effect of the interaction between reactant and anatase TiO2 nanosheets with exposed {001} facets on photocatalysis for the photocatalytic purification of VOCs. Appl Catal B Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.08.034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Rivas I, Viana M, Moreno T et al (2014) Child exposure to indoor and outdoor air pollutants in schools in Barcelona. Spain Environ Int.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.04.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Robert D, Malato S (2002) Solar photocatalysis: a clean process for water detoxification. Sci Total Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(01)01094-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Robert D, Keller V, Keller N (2013) Immobilization of a semiconductor photocatalyst on solid supports: methods, materials, and applications. In: Photocatalysis and water purification: from fundamentals to recent applications. Wiley-VCH, WeinheimCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Rohra H, Taneja A (2016) Indoor air quality scenario in India—an outline of household fuel combustion. Atmos Environ 129:243–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Sampaio MJ, Silva CG, Silva AMT et al (2013) Photocatalytic activity of TiO2-coated glass raschig rings on the degradation of phenolic derivatives under simulated solar light irradiation. Chem Eng J.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.11.027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Schleibinger H, Rüden H (1999) Air filters from HVAC systems as possible source of volatile organic compounds (VOC): laboratory and field assays. Atmos Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00274-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Serpone N, Emeline AV (2012) Semiconductor photocatalysis – past, present, and future outlook. J Phys Chem Lett 3(5):673–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Shan AY, Ghazi TIM, Rashid SA (2010) Immobilisation of titanium dioxide onto supporting materials in heterogeneous photocatalysis: a review. Appl Catal A Gen.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2010.08.053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Shaughnessy RJ, Levetin E, Blocker J, Sublette KL (1994) Effectiveness of portable indoor air cleaners: sensory testing results. Indoor Air.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.1994.t01-1-00006.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Shen YS, Ku Y (2002) Decomposition of gas-phase trichloroethene by the UV/TiO2 process in the presence of ozone. Chemosphere.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00585-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Smyth J (2010) The TiO2 Group. University of Colorado. USAGoogle Scholar
  105. Spanhel L, Weller H, Henglein A (1987) Photochemistry of semiconductor colloids. 22. Electron ejection from illuminated cadmium sulfide into attached titanium and zinc oxide particles. J Am Chem Soc.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00256a012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Stranger M, Potgieter-Vermaak SS, Van Grieken R (2009) Particulate matter and gaseous pollutants in residences in Antwerp, Belgium. Sci Total Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.10.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Sun H, Wang S (2014) Research advances in the synthesis of nanocarbon-based photocatalysts and their applications for photocatalytic conversion of carbon dioxide to hydrocarbon fuels. Energy Fuel 28(1):22–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Sun H, Wang C, Pang S et al (2008) Photocatalytic TiO2 films prepared by chemical vapor deposition at atmosphere pressure. J Non-Cryst Solids.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2007.01.108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Sun H, Wang S, Ang HM et al (2010) Halogen element modified titanium dioxide for visible light photocatalysis. Chem Eng J 162(2):437–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Sun H, Zhou G, Wang Y et al (2014) A new metal-free carbon hybrid for enhanced photocatalysis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:16745–16754.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am503820hCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Sun Y, Xiong T, Ni Z et al (2015) Improving g-C3N4 photocatalysis for NOx removal by Ag nanoparticles decoration. Appl Surf Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.07.071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Szatmáry L, Šubrt J, Kalousek V et al (2014) Low-temperature deposition of anatase on nanofiber materials for photocatalytic NOx removal. Catal Today.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2013.09.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Taskinen T, Meklin T, Nousiainen M et al (1997) Moisture and mould problems in schools and respiratory manifestations in schoolchildren: clinical and skin test findings. Acta Paediatr.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.1997.tb14841.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Technical, Report Efficiency and REC House (EREC) (2008) Spot ventilation: Source control to improve indoor air qualityGoogle Scholar
  115. Tejasvi R, Sharma M, Upadhyay K (2015) Passive photo-catalytic destruction of air-borne VOCs in high traffic areas using TiO2-coated flexible PVC sheet. Chem Eng J.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.10.040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Tennakone K, Tilakaratne CTK, Kottegoda IRM (1995) Photocatalytic degradation of organic contaminants in water with TiO2 supported on polythene films. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem.  https://doi.org/10.1016/1010-6030(94)03980-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Thevenet F, Guillard C, Rousseau A (2014) Acetylene photocatalytic oxidation using continuous flow reactor: gas phase and adsorbed phase investigation, assessment of the photocatalyst deactivation. Chem Eng J.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.01.038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. US Department of Health and Human Services (2006) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In: Healthy housing reference manual. US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  119. USEPA (2004a) Air quality criteria for particulate matter October 2004, volume 1. EPA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  120. USEPA (2004b) Air quality criteria for particulate matter October 2004, volume 2. EPA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  121. Van Durme J, Dewulf J, Leys C (2008) Development of heterogeneous plasma catalysis for the abatement of health damaging organic micropollutants in indoor environments, UGent. Faculty of Bioscience EngineeringGoogle Scholar
  122. Verriele M, Schoemaecker C, Hanoune B et al (2016) The MERMAID study: indoor and outdoor average pollutant concentrations in 10 low-energy school buildings in France. Indoor Air.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Vinu R, Madras G (2010) Environmental remediation by photocatalysis. J Indian Inst Sci 90(2):189–230Google Scholar
  124. Wan Z, Zhang G (2015) Synthesis and facet-dependent enhanced photocatalytic activity of Bi2 SiO5/AgI nanoplate photocatalysts. J Mater Chem A.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA03465ECrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Wang S, Ang HM, Tade MO (2007) Volatile organic compounds in indoor environment and photocatalytic oxidation: state of the art. Environ Int 33(5):694–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Wang B, Mortazavi R, Haghighat F (2009) Evaluation of modeling and measurement techniques of ultraviolet germicidal irradiation effectiveness – towards the design of immune buildings. Indoor Built Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X09103024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Wang C, Ma J, Liu F et al (2015) The effects of Mn2+ precursors on the structure and ozone decomposition activity of cryptomelane-type manganese oxide (OMS-2) catalysts. J Phys Chem C.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b08095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Waring MS, Siegel JA, Corsi RL (2008) Ultrafine particle removal and generation by portable air cleaners. Atmos Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.02.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Weschler CJ, Shields HC (1996) Production of the hydroxyl radical in indoor air. Environ Sci Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es960032fCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Weschler CJ, Hodgson AT, Wooley JD (1992a) Indoor chemistry: ozone, volatile organic compounds, and carpets. Environ Sci Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es00036a006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Weschler CJ, Michael B, Petros K (1992b) Indoor ozone and nitrogen dioxide: a potential pathway to the generation of nitrate radicals, dinitrogen pentoxide, and nitric acid indoors. Environ Sci Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es00025a022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. WHO (2000) Air quality guidelines for Europe. Environ Sci Pollut Res.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02986808
  133. WHO (2014) Indoor air quality guidelines: household fuel combustion. World Health Organization. isbn:9789241548878Google Scholar
  134. Wolkoff P, Nielsen GD (2001) Organic compounds in indoor air—their relevance for perceived indoor air quality? Atmos Environ 35(26):4407–4417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Xie H, Liu B, Zhao X (2016) Facile process to greatly improve the photocatalytic activity of the TiO2 thin film on window glass for the photodegradation of acetone and benzene. Chem Eng J.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.09.049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Yu JC, Lin J, Lo D, Lam SK (2000) Influence of thermal treatment on the adsorption of oxygen and photocatalytic activity of TiO2. Langmuir.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la000309wCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Yu BF, Hu ZB, Liu M et al (2009) Review of research on air-conditioning systems and indoor air quality control for human health. Int J Refrig 32(1):3–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Zhang J, Smith KR (2003) Indoor air pollution: a global health concern. Br Med Bull 68:209–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Zhang Y, Mo J, Li Y et al (2011) Can commonly-used fan-driven air cleaning technologies improve indoor air quality? A literature review. Atmos Environ 45(26):4329–4343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Zhang P, Liu L, He Y et al (2015) One-dimensional angular surface plasmon resonance imaging based array thermometer. Sens Actuators B Chem.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2014.10.055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Zhao J, Yang X (2003) Photocatalytic oxidation for indoor air purification: a literature review. Build Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1323(02)00212-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Zhong L, Haghighat F (2015) Photocatalytic air cleaners and materials technologies – abilities and limitations. Build Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.01.033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Zhuang H, Gu Q, Long J et al (2014) Visible light-driven decomposition of gaseous benzene on robust Sn2+-doped anatase TiO2 nanoparticles. RSC Adv.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ra05904bCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. (2014) 7 million deaths annually linked to air pollution. Cent Eur J Public HealthGoogle Scholar
  145. (2005) WHO. Air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide. Technical report, World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  146. (2014) US Environmental Protection Agency. National ambient air quality standards (NAAQS)Google Scholar
  147. (2015) European Commission. Air quality standardsGoogle Scholar
  148. (2010) WHO Regional Office for Europe. Guidelines for indoor air quality. Technical reportGoogle Scholar
  149. (2016) The US Environmental Protection Agency Website. Exposure to radon causes lung cancer in non-smokers and smokers alikeGoogle Scholar
  150. (2007) United States Environmental Protection Agency. Benzo(a)pyrene (BaP). TEACH Chemical Summary 1:1–14Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shanmuga Sundar Dhanabalan
    • 1
  • Sivanantha Raja Avaninathan
    • 2
  • Saravanan Rajendran
    • 3
  • Marcos Flores Carrasco
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsUniversidad de ChileSantiagoChile
  2. 2.Department of ECEAlagappa Chettiar Government College of Engineering & TechnologyKaraikudiIndia
  3. 3.Faculty of Engineering, Mechanical DepartmentUniversity of TarapacáAricaChile

Personalised recommendations