Advertisement

Green Photocatalyst for Diverge Applications

  • D. Durgalakshmi
  • R. Ajay Rakkesh
  • Saravanan Rajendran
  • Mu. Naushad
Chapter
Part of the Environmental Chemistry for a Sustainable World book series (ECSW, volume 36)

Abstract

The demand for sustainable materials in the area of energy and environment has been going forth among researchers over the past several years. This is imputable to the increasing demand globally in the field of energy and environmental sectors to conserve the materials for future needs, either in the form of reuse or reprocessing the materials by environmentally friendly style. The advancement in the green photoactive nanostructure materials for energy- and environmental-related applications has been increased gradually, and sophisticated progress has also been developed and carried out innovatively. Various synthesis approaches have been demonstrated to synthesize materials using environmentally benign chemicals. There are several green chemicals available in our ecosystem, including biomass, recycling chemical waste and carbon dioxide, etc. On the whole, the incorporation of green chemistry is an essential role to maintain vast technological development and the economic competitiveness of advanced social club as easily as for future generations.

Keywords

Green photocatalyst Nanomaterials Energy Environment Bio-based materials Solar disinfection 

Notes

Acknowledgment

One of the authors D. Durgalakshmi gratefully acknowledges DST-INSPIRE Faculty Fellowship under the sanction DST/INSPIRE/04/2016/000845 for their funding. R. Saravanan gratefully acknowledges financial support from the SERC (CONICYT/FONDAP/15110019), FONDECYT, Government of Chile (Project No.: 11170414), and School of Mechanical Engineering (EUDIM), Universidad de Tarapacá, Arica, Chile.

References

  1. Abas N, Kalair A, Khan N (2015) Review of fossil fuels and future energy technologies. Futures 69:31–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrafioti E, Kalderis D, Diamadopoulos E (2014) Arsenic and chromium removal from water using biochars derived from rice husk, organic solid wastes and sewage sludge. J Environ Manag 133:309–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmad H, Kamarudin S, Minggu L, Kassim M (2015) Hydrogen from photo-catalytic water splitting process: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 43:599–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Al-Othman ZA, Ali R, Naushad M (2012) Hexavalent chromium removal from aqueous medium by activated carbon prepared from peanut shell: adsorption kinetics, equilibrium and thermodynamic studies. Chem Eng J 184:238–247.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.01.048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Albadarin AB, Charara M, Abu Tarboush BJ et al (2017) Mechanism analysis of tartrazine biosorption onto masau stones; a low cost by-product from semi-arid regions. J Mol Liq 242:478.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2017.07.045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aldrich TE, Easterly CE (1987) Electromagnetic fields and public health. Environ Health Perspect 75:159–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ali SH, Giurco D, Arndt N, Nickless E, Brown G, Demetriades A, Durrheim R, Enriquez MA, Kinnaird J, Littleboy A (2017) Mineral supply for sustainable development requires resource governance. Nature 543(7645):367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Alqadami AA, Naushad M, Alothman ZA, Ghfar AA (2017) Novel metal-organic framework (MOF) based composite material for the sequestration of U(VI) and Th(IV) metal ions from aqueous environment. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(41):36026–36037.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b10768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Alrousan D, Polo-López M, Dunlop P, Fernández-Ibáñez P, Byrne J (2012) Solar photocatalytic disinfection of water with immobilised titanium dioxide in re-circulating flow CPC reactors. Appl Catal B Environ 128:126–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berardi S, Drouet S, Francas L, Gimbert-Suriñach C, Guttentag M, Richmond C, Stoll T, Llobet A (2014) Molecular artificial photosynthesis. Chem Soc Rev 43(22):7501–7519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bilgili M, Ozbek A, Sahin B, Kahraman A (2015) An overview of renewable electric power capacity and progress in new technologies in the world. Renew Sust Energ Rev 49:323–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bischel MS (2015) Moving beyond single attributes to holistically assess the sustainability of materials. In: Green and sustainable manufacturing of advanced material. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 11–29Google Scholar
  13. Bondioli F, Barbieri L, Ferrari AM, Manfredini T (2010) Characterization of rice husk ash and its recycling as quartz substitute for the production of ceramic glazes. J Am Ceram Soc 93(1):121–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Candal R, Martínez-de la Cruz A (2015) New visible-light active semiconductors. In: Photocatalytic semiconductors. Springer, Cham, pp 41–67Google Scholar
  15. Cao S, Yu J (2014) g-C3N4-based photocatalysts for hydrogen generation. The J Phys Chem Lett 5(12):2101–2107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chan SHS, Yeong Wu T, Juan JC, Teh CY (2011) Recent developments of metal oxide semiconductors as photocatalysts in advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) for treatment of dye waste-water. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 86(9):1130–1158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen X, Shen S, Guo L, Mao SS (2010) Semiconductor-based photocatalytic hydrogen generation. Chem Rev 110(11):6503–6570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clarkson TW (1997) The toxicology of mercury. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 34(4):369–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clasen T, McLaughlin C, Nayaar N, Boisson S, Gupta R, Desai D, Shah N (2008) Microbiological effectiveness and cost of disinfecting water by boiling in semi-urban India. Am J Trop Med Hyg 79(3):407–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Clavero C (2014) Plasmon-induced hot-electron generation at nanoparticle/metal-oxide interfaces for photovoltaic and photocatalytic devices. Nat Photonics 8(2):95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Company BP (2018) BP statistical review of world energy. British Petroleum Company, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Cornejo IA, Reimanis IE, Ramalingam S (2015) Methods of making glass from organic waste food streams. Google PatentsGoogle Scholar
  23. Covert T, Greenstone M, Knittel CR (2016) Will we ever stop using fossil fuels? J Econ Perspect 30(1):117–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Daghrir R, Drogui P, Robert D (2013) Modified TiO2 for environmental photocatalytic applications: a review. Ind Eng Chem Res 52(10):3581–3599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Demirbas A (2008) Biofuels sources, biofuel policy, biofuel economy and global biofuel projections. Energy Convers Manag 49(8):2106–2116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Demirbas A (2011) Competitive liquid biofuels from biomass. Appl Energy 88(1):17–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dias JM, Alvim-Ferraz MC, Almeida MF, Rivera-Utrilla J, Sánchez-Polo M (2007) Waste materials for activated carbon preparation and its use in aqueous-phase treatment: a review. J Environ Manag 85(4):833–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Diebold U (2003) The surface science of titanium dioxide. Surf Sci Rep 48(5–8):53–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Djurišić AB, Leung YH, Ng AMC (2014) Strategies for improving the efficiency of semiconductor metal oxide photocatalysis. Mater Horiz 1(4):400–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dong S, Feng J, Fan M, Pi Y, Hu L, Han X, Liu M, Sun J, Sun J (2015) Recent developments in heterogeneous photocatalytic water treatment using visible light-responsive photocatalysts: a review. RSC Adv 5(19):14610–14630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Seyboth K, Kadner S, Zwickel T, Eickemeier P, Hansen G, Schlömer S, von Stechow C (2011) Renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation: special report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Etacheri V, Di Valentin C, Schneider J, Bahnemann D, Pillai SC (2015) Visible-light activation of TiO2 photocatalysts: advances in theory and experiments. J Photochem Photobiol C: Photochem Rev 25:1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fagan R, McCormack DE, Dionysiou DD, Pillai SC (2016) A review of solar and visible light active TiO2 photocatalysis for treating bacteria, cyanotoxins and contaminants of emerging concern. Mater Sci Semicond Process 42:2–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fox MA, Dulay MT (1993) Heterogeneous photocatalysis. Chem Rev 93(1):341–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gaya UI, Abdullah AH (2008) Heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of organic contaminants over titanium dioxide: a review of fundamentals, progress and problems. J Photochem Photobiol C: Photochem Rev 9(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ghasemi M, Naushad M, Ghasemi N, Khosravi-fard Y (2014) Adsorption of Pb(II) from aqueous solution using new adsorbents prepared from agricultural waste: adsorption isotherm and kinetic studies. J Ind Eng Chem 20:2193–2199.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2013.09.050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gnanasekaran L, Hemamalini R, Naushad M (2018) Efficient photocatalytic degradation of toxic dyes using nanostructured TiO2/polyaniline nanocomposite. Desalin Water Treat 108:322–328.  https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2018.21967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Goldemberg J (2007) Ethanol for a sustainable energy future. Science 315(5813):808–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gupta TK, Singh BP, Mathur RB, Dhakate SR (2014) Multi-walled carbon nanotube–graphene–polyaniline multiphase nanocomposite with superior electromagnetic shielding effectiveness. Nanoscale 6(2):842–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gupta PK, Khan ZH, Solanki PR (2018) Effect of nitrogen doping on structural and electrochemical properties of zirconia nanoparticles. Adv Sci Lett 24(2):867–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Herrmann J-M (1999) Heterogeneous photocatalysis: fundamentals and applications to the removal of various types of aqueous pollutants. Catal Today 53(1):115–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Herrmann J-M (2005) Heterogeneous photocatalysis: state of the art and present applications in honor of Pr. RL Burwell Jr (1912–2003), former Head of Ipatieff Laboratories, Northwestern University, Evanston (Ill). Top Catal 34(1–4):49–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Heusser G (1995) Low-radioactivity background techniques. Annu Rev Nucl Part Sci 45(1):543–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Iavicoli I, Leso V, Ricciardi W, Hodson LL, Hoover MD (2014) Opportunities and challenges of nanotechnology in the green economy. Environ Health 13(1):78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Inyang MI, Gao B, Yao Y, Xue Y, Zimmerman A, Mosa A, Pullammanappallil P, Ok YS, Cao X (2016) A review of biochar as a low-cost adsorbent for aqueous heavy metal removal. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 46(4):406–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Islam S, Nagpure S, Kim D, Rankin S (2017) Synthesis and catalytic applications of non-metal doped mesoporous titania. Inorganics 5(1):15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jaiswal R, Bharambe J, Patel N, Dashora A, Kothari D, Miotello A (2015) Copper and nitrogen co-doped TiO2 photocatalyst with enhanced optical absorption and catalytic activity. Appl Catal B Environ 168:333–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Khan MM (2018) 2 – Metal oxide powder photocatalysts. In: Lin Z, Ye M, Wang M (eds) Multifunctional photocatalytic materials for energy. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, pp 5–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-101977-1.00002-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kongjao S, Damronglerd S, Hunsom M (2008) Simultaneous removal of organic and inorganic pollutants in tannery wastewater using electrocoagulation technique. Korean J Chem Eng 25(4):703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kumar A, Naushad M, Rana A et al (2017) ZnSe-WO3 nano-hetero-assembly stacked on Gum ghatti for photo-degradative removal of Bisphenol A: Symbiose of adsorption and photocatalysis. Int J Biol Macromol 104:1172–1184.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.06.116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kumar S, Terashima C, Fujishima A, Krishnan V, Pitchaimuthu S (2019) Photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants in water using graphene oxide composite. In: A new generation material graphene: applications in water technology. Springer, Cham, pp 413–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lancaster M (2016) Green chemistry 3rd edition: an introductory text. Royal Society of Chemistry, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  53. Lang X, Chen X, Zhao J (2014) Heterogeneous visible light photocatalysis for selective organic transformations. Chem Soc Rev 43(1):473–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lee KM, Lai CW, Ngai KS, Juan JC (2016) Recent developments of zinc oxide based photocatalyst in water treatment technology: a review. Water Res 88:428–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lehmann J, Joseph S (2015) Biochar for environmental management: science, technology and implementation. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lin Z, Ye M, Wang M (2018) Multifunctional photocatalytic materials for energy. Woodhead Publishing, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  57. Liu W-J, Jiang H, Yu H-Q (2015) Development of biochar-based functional materials: toward a sustainable platform carbon material. Chem Rev 115(22):12251–12285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. McGuigan KG, Conroy RM, Mosler H-J, du Preez M, Ubomba-Jaswa E, Fernandez-Ibañez P (2012) Solar water disinfection (SODIS): a review from bench-top to roof-top. J Hazard Mater 235:29–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Milani B (2005) Building materials in a green economy: community-based strategies for dematerialization. University of Toronto, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  60. Mohanty AK, Misra M, Drzal L (2002) Sustainable bio-composites from renewable resources: opportunities and challenges in the green materials world. J Polym Environ 10(1–2):19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Moldavska A, Welo T (2017) The concept of sustainable manufacturing and its definitions: a content-analysis based literature review. J Clea Prod 166:744–755.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Moniz SJ, Shevlin SA, Martin DJ, Guo Z-X, Tang J (2015) Visible-light driven heterojunction photocatalysts for water splitting – a critical review. Energy Environ Sci 8(3):731–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Mooibroek H, Cornish K (2000) Alternative sources of natural rubber. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 53(4):355–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Naushad M, Mittal A, Rathore M, Gupta V (2015) Ion-exchange kinetic studies for Cd(II), Co(II), Cu(II), and Pb(II) metal ions over a composite cation exchanger. Desalin Water Treat 54:2883–2890.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2014.904823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Naushad M, Ahamad T, Al-Maswari BM et al (2017) Nickel ferrite bearing nitrogen-doped mesoporous carbon as efficient adsorbent for the removal of highly toxic metal ion from aqueous medium. Chem Eng J 330:1351.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.08.079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ni M, Leung MK, Leung DY, Sumathy K (2007) A review and recent developments in photocatalytic water-splitting using TiO2 for hydrogen production. Renew Sust Energ Rev 11(3):401–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Omrani E, Barari B, Moghadam AD, Rohatgi PK, Pillai KM (2015) Mechanical and tribological properties of self-lubricating bio-based carbon-fabric epoxy composites made using liquid composite molding. Tribol Int 92:222–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Priedulena E, Hogeforster M (2016) Improvement of skills in the green economy through the advanced training programs on cradle to cradle. BoD–Books on Demand, NorderstedtGoogle Scholar
  69. Prusty JK, Patro SK, Basarkar S (2016) Concrete using agro-waste as fine aggregate for sustainable built environment – a review. Int J Sustain Built Environ 5(2):312–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ramesh T, Prakash R, Shukla K (2010) Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: an overview. Energ Buildings 42(10):1592–1600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ramírez-Rico J, Martínez-Fernandez J, Singh M (2017) Biomorphic ceramics from wood-derived precursors. Int Mater Rev 62(8):465–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ren21 R (2016) Global status report. REN21 Secretariat, ParisGoogle Scholar
  73. Saha M, Darnton G (2005) Green companies or green companies: are companies really green, or are they pretending to be? Bus Soc Rev 110(2):117–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Salvato JA, Nemerow NL, Agardy FJ (2003) Environmental engineering. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  75. Schandl H, Hatfield-Dodds S, Wiedmann T, Geschke A, Cai Y, West J, Newth D, Baynes T, Lenzen M, Owen A (2016) Decoupling global environmental pressure and economic growth: scenarios for energy use, materials use and carbon emissions. J Clean Prod 132:45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schultz DM, Yoon TP (2014) Solar synthesis: prospects in visible light photocatalysis. Science 343(6174):1239176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sharma G, Naushad M, Kumar A et al (2017) Efficient removal of coomassie brilliant blue R-250 dye using starch/poly(alginic acid-cl-acrylamide) nanohydrogel. Process Saf Environ Prot 109:301–310.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2017.04.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sheldon RA (2016) Green chemistry and resource efficiency: towards a green economy. Green Chem 18(11):3180–3183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Singh M, Ohji T, Asthana R (2015a) Green and sustainable manufacturing of advanced material. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  80. Singh M, Ohji T, Asthana R (2015b) Green and sustainable manufacturing of advanced materials—progress and prospects. In: Green and sustainable manufacturing of advanced material. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 3–10Google Scholar
  81. Spasiano D, Marotta R, Malato S, Fernandez-Ibanez P, Di Somma I (2015) Solar photocatalysis: materials, reactors, some commercial, and pre-industrialized applications. A comprehensive approach. Appl Catal B Environ 170:90–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Thomas CE (2009) Fuel cell and battery electric vehicles compared. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34(15):6005–6020.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.06.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tracy AA, Bhatia SK, Ramadurai KW (2018) Bio-based materials as applicable, accessible, and affordable healthcare solutions. Springer, ChamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Varadan VK, Varadan VV, Williams NR, Cresko JW (1994) Electromagnetic shielding materials. Google PatentsGoogle Scholar
  85. Wen B, Cao M, Lu M, Cao W, Shi H, Liu J, Wang X, Jin H, Fang X, Wang W (2014) Reduced graphene oxides: light-weight and high-efficiency electromagnetic interference shielding at elevated temperatures. Adv Mater 26(21):3484–3489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wu W, Zhang S, Ren F, Xiao X, Zhou J, Jiang C (2011) Controlled synthesis of magnetic iron oxides@ SnO 2 quasi-hollow core–shell heterostructures: formation mechanism, and enhanced photocatalytic activity. Nanoscale 3(11):4676–4684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Yahya MA, Al-Qodah Z, Ngah CZ (2015) Agricultural bio-waste materials as potential sustainable precursors used for activated carbon production: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 46:218–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Yang X, Cui H, Li Y, Qin J, Zhang R, Tang H (2013) Fabrication of Ag3PO4-graphene composites with highly efficient and stable visible light photocatalytic performance. ACS Catal 3(3):363–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Yaremenko IA, Vil VA, Demchuk DV, Terent’ev AO (2016) Rearrangements of organic peroxides and related processes. Beilstein J Org Chem 12(1):1647–1748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Zhi W-J, Wang L-F, Hu X-J (2017) Recent advances in the effects of microwave radiation on brains. Mil Med Res 4(1):29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Zhou H, Li X, Fan T, Osterloh FE, Ding J, Sabio EM, Zhang D, Guo Q (2010) Artificial inorganic leafs for efficient photochemical hydrogen production inspired by natural photosynthesis. Adv Mater 22(9):951–956CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Durgalakshmi
    • 1
  • R. Ajay Rakkesh
    • 2
  • Saravanan Rajendran
    • 3
  • Mu. Naushad
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Medical PhysicsAnna UniversityChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Centre for Advanced Study in Crystallography and BiophysicsUniversity of MadrasChennaiIndia
  3. 3.Faculty of Engineering, Mechanical DepartmentUniversity of TarapacáAricaChile
  4. 4.Department of Chemistry, College of ScienceKing Saud UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations