Advertisement

CODA: Involution to Evolution; ‘He Made the Future Live Before Us’

  • Victoria de RijkeEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Landscapes: the Arts, Aesthetics, and Education book series (LAAE, volume 25)

Abstract

In Steiner’s esoteric cosmology, pictures may fall into dust, but the soul of an artist and the ideas that creations represent will be living powers forever. ‘The art of today will be the Nature of tomorrow and will blossom again in her. Thus does involution become evolution’ (1909, L9) as we turn in on ourselves on the inner path of the human soul to the self. How sustainable this view is today, and how interdisciplinary arts practice might continue in forms adapted for modernity is a shared challenge and responsibility for our imaginations.

Keywords

Imagination Interdisciplinarity Inclusivity Multi-modal Transpedagogies 

References

  1. Ajaykumar. (2004). Zen and the art of peer and self-assessment in interdisciplinary, multimedia, site-specific arts practice: A transcultural approach. Art, Design and Communication in Higher Education, 2(3), 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander, T. M. (1996). Dewey, John. In D. Cooper (Ed.), A companion to aesthetics (pp. 118–122). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  3. Alizadeh, A. (2018). Marx and art: Use, value, poetry. Continental Thought and Theory, 1(4), 587–615.Google Scholar
  4. Baker, H. (2009). Abigail’s party. Artist teacher. Newcastle: Arts & Social Sciences Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Ball, S. J. (2012). Global education Inc: New policy networks and the neoliberal imaginary. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Beane, J. A. (1997). Curriculum integration: Designing the core of democratic education. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bellows, S. (2007). The boundaries of natural science, Rudolf Steiner Archive https://wn.rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA322/English/AP1983/BndSci_forward.html
  8. Bogue, R. (2013). The art of teaching/teaching the arts. In I. Smetsky & D. Masny (Eds.), Deleuze and education. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Burke, C. (2017). The arts have a fundamental place in education The Guardian Letters, Fri. 31st March.Google Scholar
  10. Carlin, M., & Wallin, J. (Eds.). (2014). Deleuze and Guattari. Politics of education: For a people-yet-to-come. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  11. Catteral, J. S., Dumais, S. A., & Hampden-Thompson, G. (2012). The arts and achievement in at-risk youth: Findings from four longitudinal studies. Washington: National Endowment for the Arts Report.Google Scholar
  12. Chappell, K. (2018). From wise humanising creativity to (Posthumanising) creativity. In K. Snepvangers, P. Thompson, & A. Harris (Eds.), Creativity policy, partnerships and practice in education. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  13. Chappell, K. A., Pender, T., et al. (2016). Making and being made: Wise humanising creativity in interdisciplinary early years arts education. International Journal of Early Years Education, 24(3), 254–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cooper, B. (2019). Primary Colours: The decline of arts education in primary schools and how it can be reversed. London: Fabian Society Policy Report.Google Scholar
  15. Craft, A. (2013). Childhood, possibility thinking and wise, humanising educational futures. International Journal of Educational Research, 61, 126–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dahlin, B. (2013). Gloves of ice or free hands? A nomadic reading of Rudolf Steiner, Bergson, Delueze and others on knowledge as non-representational and the importance of aesthetics. Other Education: The Journal of Educational Alternatives, 2(2), 67–89.Google Scholar
  17. Dahlin, B. (2017). Rudolf Steiner: The relevance of Waldorf education. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Da Vinci, L. (1980). Notebooks. Richter IA (ed) Oxford OUP.Google Scholar
  19. DePeiro, G. & Brabin, T. (2017). Privilege is playing too great a role in the arts, The Guardian, Sat 11th Feb.Google Scholar
  20. Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. London: Perigree Books.Google Scholar
  21. ELF East London Fawcett Study. (2016). Representation of female artists in Britain. London: Freelands Foundation.Google Scholar
  22. Gardner, H. (1980). Artful scribbles: The significance of children’s drawings. London: Jill Norman.Google Scholar
  23. Goldwin-Meadow, S. (2005). Hearing Gestures: how our hands help us think. Cambridge, MA: Bellnap.Google Scholar
  24. Gregory, D. (2017). Let’s get rid of art education in schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 98(7), 21–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grierson, E. M. (2017). Re-imagining learning through art as experience: An aesthetic approach to education for life. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(13), 1246–1256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Heidegger, M. (1967) What is a thing? Trans. WB Barton Jr. and V Deutsch Chicago, Henry Regnery https://static1.squarespace.com/static/…/t/…/1446502735298/heidegger_1967.pdf.
  27. Heron, P. (1996). Patrick Heron on art and education. Yorkshire: Bretton Hall.Google Scholar
  28. Hickman, R. (2005). Why we make art and why it is taught. Bristol: Intellect Books.Google Scholar
  29. Hoban, R. (1967). The mouse and his child (1972 edn.). London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
  30. Hillman, J. (1989). The poetic basis of mind. In T. Moore (Ed.), A blue fire: Selected writings by James Hillman. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  31. Ikeuchi, I. (2016). Art as cognitive fluidity from the viewpoint of representation and scale understanding in childhood. Studies in Art Education, 48(1).Google Scholar
  32. Irwin, M. R. (2016). Arts shoved aside: Changing art practices in primary schools since the introduction of National Standards. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 10(1).Google Scholar
  33. Klein, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Lees, H. (2016). Diamond scholarship in and for alternative education. Other Education: The journal of Educational Alternatives, 5(1), 1–3.Google Scholar
  35. Liu, F-J. (2013) in Leong, S., & Leung, B. W. Creative arts in education and culture: Perpectives from Greater China. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  36. Lowenfeld, V., & Lambert Brittain, W. (1949). Creative and mental growth (8th Ed. 1987). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  37. Maconie, S (2015). The privileged are taking over the arts – Without the grit, pop culture is doomed. Music & Theatre, 4th February.Google Scholar
  38. Naughton, C., Biesta, G., & Cole, D. R. (Eds.). (2017). Art, artists and pedagogy: Philosophy in the arts and education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Palmer, P. (1993). To know as we are known: Education as spiritual journey. San Francisco, CA: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  40. Ringrose, J. (2011). Beyond discourse? Using Deleuze and Guattari’s schizoanalysis to explore affective assemblages, heterosexually striated space, and lines of flight online and at school. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(6), 598–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rosen, M. (2014). How we teach the arts is as important as the fact we’re doing it. The Guardian. Wed 4th June.Google Scholar
  42. Rosen, M. (2016). Dear Justine greening, Michael Gove attacked school arts openly. You do it on the QT, The Guardian, 6th December.Google Scholar
  43. Sameshima, P. (2007). Seeing red - A pedagogy of parallax: An epistolary bildungsroman on artful scholarly inquiry. Youngstown, NY: Cambria Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Scruton, R. (1982). Art and imagination (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Seaman, D., & Zajonc, A. (1998). Goethe’s way of science: A phenomenology of nature. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  46. Slattery D. P. & Selig J. L. (2009) Reimagining education: Essays on reviving the soul of learning. Spring Journal.Google Scholar
  47. Smetsky, I., & Masny, D. (2011). The ‘untimely’ Deleuze: Some implications for educational policy. Policy Futures in Education, 9(4).Google Scholar
  48. Steers, J. (2003). Art and design in the UK: The theory gap. In Addison N and burgess L issues in art and design teaching. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Steiner, R. (1909). Lecture 9. Being of man/future evolution.Google Scholar
  50. Steiner, R. (1972). A modern art of education: Fourteen lectures given in Ilkley. Yorkshire, 5th–17th August 1923 Rudolf Steiner Press.Google Scholar
  51. Steiner, R. (2018). The case for anthroposophy. London: Steiner Books.Google Scholar
  52. Weil, S. (2009). In Waiting for God (Ed.), Reflections on the right use of school studies with a view to the love of god. London: Harper Collins (original 1942).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. White, A. (1990). The language of imagination. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  54. Wilkins, J. L. M., Graham, G., Parker, S., Westfall, S., Fraser, R. G., & Tembo, M. (2003). Time in the arts and physical education and school achievement. Curriculum Studies., 35(6), 721–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Whiting, R. (1992). Leonardo: A portrait of the renaissance man. London: Barrie & Jenkins.Google Scholar
  56. Wilson, F. R. (1998). The hand: How its use shapes the brain, language and human culture. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Middlesex UniversityLondonUK

Personalised recommendations