Creative ‘Stuff’ in the Steiner Kindergarten: How Steiner Educators Understand the Art Materials They Work With

  • Mona SakrEmail author
Part of the Landscapes: the Arts, Aesthetics, and Education book series (LAAE, volume 25)


This chapter focuses on the ‘stuff’ that is used in Steiner early years settings to facilitate young children’s creative expression. I apply a social semiotic lens to this investigation, considering the affordances of popular materials in Steiner classrooms, while also drawing on the post human concept of entanglement, which highlights the constant intra-action between human and non-human agents in the creative process. I report data from an interview study with three Steiner kindergarten teachers, in which they shared and explained the materials that were most important to them in the creative expression of the children that they worked with. Their responses demonstrate how the Steiner vision positions some materials as helping children to maintain a dreamy state of being, while others are perceived as prompting a damaging premature intellectual awakening. The findings also show how Steiner practitioners have a special vocabulary around materials that helps them to make inspiring points of connection between the cosmic and the mundane in their work with children.


Kindergarten; Semiotic resources Posthuman Material Intra-action 


  1. Anning, A. (2002). Conversations around young children’s drawing: The impact of the beliefs of significant others at home and school. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 21(3), 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anning, A. (2003). Pathways to the graphicacy club: The crossroad of home and pre-school. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 3(1), 5–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barad. (2007). Meeting the universe Halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meeting. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2015). Multimodality, learning and communication: A social semiotic frame. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burkitt, E., Jolley, R., & Rose, S. (2010). The attitudes and practices that shape children’s drawing experience at home and at school. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 29(3), 257–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cox, M. V., & Rowlands, A. (2000). The effect of three different educational approaches on children’s drawing ability: Steiner, Montessori and traditional. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(4), 485–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Denmead, T., & Hickman, R. (2012). Viscerality and Slowliness: An anatomy of Artists’ pedagogies of material and time. International Journal of Education and the Arts, 13(9).Google Scholar
  10. Duncum, P. (2013). Teaching the elements of realistic-style pictures. Art Education, 66(1), 46–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Edwards, C. P. (2002). Three approaches from Europe: Waldorf, Montessori, and Reggio Emilia. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 4(1).Google Scholar
  12. Glas, C. (2010). A few thoughts. Kindling: The Journal for Steiner Waldorf Early Childhood Care and Education, 18, 17–20.Google Scholar
  13. Golomb, C. (2004). Sculpture: Representational development in a three-dimensional medium. Handbook of research and policy in art education, pp 329–352.Google Scholar
  14. Hodge, R., Hodge, R. I. V., & Kress, G. R. (1988). Social semiotics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hosea, H. (2006). The Brush’s footmarks: Parents and infants paint together in a small community art therapy group. International Journal of Art Therapy, 11(2), 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jewitt, C., & Kress, G. R. (Eds.). (2003). Multimodal literacy. New York: Lang.Google Scholar
  17. Kress, G. (1997). Before writing: Rethinking pathways to literacy. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  18. Kress, G. (2005a). Gains and losses: New forms of texts, knowledge, and learning. Computers and Composition, 22(1), 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kress, G. (2005b). Before writing: Rethinking the paths to literacy. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. McClure, M. (2011). Child as totem: Redressing the myth of inherent creativity in early childhood. Studies in Art Education, 52(2), 127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Oberski, I. (2006). Learning to think in Steiner-Waldorf schools. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 5(3), 336–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Oliver, M. (2005). The problem with affordance. E-Learning and Digital Media, 2(4), 402–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pacini-Ketchabaw, V. (2012). Acting with the clock: Clocking practices in early childhood. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 13(2), 154–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rose, S. E., Jolley, R. P., & Charman, A. (2012). An investigation of the expressive and representational drawing development in National Curriculum, Steiner, and Montessori schools. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(1), 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sakr, M. (2017). Digital technologies in early childhood art: Enabling playful experiences. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  27. Sakr, M., Connelly, V., & Wild, M. (2018). Imitative or iconoclastic? How young children use ready-made images in digital art. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 37(1), 41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schweizer, S. (2010). Art around the young child in painting and drawing. Kindling: The Journal for Steiner Waldorf Early Childhood Care and Education, 18, 5–12.Google Scholar
  29. Steiner, R. (2000). The philosophy of freedom. London: Rudolf Steiner Press. Original work (1894).Google Scholar
  30. Strauss, M. (2007). Understanding children’s drawings: Tracing the path of incarnation. London: Rudolf Steiner Press.Google Scholar
  31. Taylor, A., & Pacini-Ketchabaw, V. (2015). Learning with children, ants, and worms in the Anthropocene: Towards a common world pedagogy of multispecies vulnerability. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 23(4), 507–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Uhrmacher, P. B. (1995). Uncommon schooling: A historical look at Rudolf Steiner, anthroposophy, and Waldorf education. Curriculum Inquiry, 25(4), 381–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. London/New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  34. Von Heydebrand, C. (2010). Painting and the child. Kindling: The Journal for Steiner Waldorf Early Childhood Care and Education, 18, 20–22.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Middlesex UniversityLondonUK

Personalised recommendations