Advertisement

The Qur’ānic Hints about Epistemic Responsibility: An Analysis of Etymological Variants of ‘i-l-m in the Text

  • M. Ashraf Adeel
Chapter
Part of the Sophia Studies in Cross-cultural Philosophy of Traditions and Cultures book series (SCPT, volume 29)

Abstract

In this chapter we examine some of the verses about perceptual, intellectual, and revelatory knowledge. It is argued that these Qur’ānic verses are best understood as ways of defining knowledge in terms of certain natural and acquired epistemic dispositions or virtues. Human beings are held accountable by the Qur’ān for the proper use of their perceptual and rational faculties. The Qur’ānic concept of revelation as God’s testimony is highlighted along with the Qur’ānic emphasis on the Prophet’s responsibility for proper communication of the content of revelation. It is argued that knowledge for the Qur’ān seems to involve effective exercise of our natural perceptual, rational, and intuitive faculties as well as acquired dispositions or intellectual virtues. The Qur’ānic verses talk both about proper use of natural faculties and exercise of acquired intellectual virtues for acquisition of knowledge. Hence, it is suggested that the divide between responsibilist and reliabilist camps of virtue epistemology needs to be bridged. Some developments in this direction are noted.

Keywords

Epistemic responsibility Perceptual knowledge Intellectual knowledge Revelation Acquired intellectual virtues Natural faculties as virtues 

References

  1. Austin, J.L. 1979. Other Minds. In Philosophical Papers, ed. J.O. Urmson and G.J. Warnock, 3rd ed., 76–116. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baehr, Jason. 2009. Evidentialism, Vice, and Virtue. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 78 (3): 545–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bloomfield, P. 2000. Virtue Epistemology and the Epistemology of Virtue. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (1): 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Booth, A.R. 2016. Islamic Philosophy and the Ethics of Belief. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Comesana, Juan. 2010. Evidentialist Reliabilism. Nous 44 (4): 571–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Goldman, Alvin. 2001. Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (1): 85–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ———. 2011. Toward a Synthesis of Reliabilism and Evidentialism? Or: Evidentialism’s Troubles, Reliabilism’s Rescue Package. In Evidentialism and its Discontents, ed. Trent Dougherty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Greco, John. 2000. Two Kinds of Intellectual Virtue. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (1): 179–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. ———. 2003. Knowledge as Credit for True Belief. In Intellectual Virtue, ed. Michael DePaul and Linda Zagzebsky. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hume, David. 1967. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. In Hume’s Enquiries, ed. L.A. Selby-Bigge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Iqbal, Muhammad. 2012. The Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Napier, Stephen. 2008. Virtue Epistemology: Motivation and Knowledge. Analysis Reviews 70 (3): 589–591.Google Scholar
  13. Pritchard, Duncan. 2016. Seeing it for Oneself: Perceptual Knowledge, Understanding, and Intellectual Autonomy. Episteme 13 (1): 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rahman, Fazlur. 2009. Major Themes of the Qur’an. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (originally published by Bibliotheca Islamica in 1989).Google Scholar
  15. ———. 2011. Prophecy in Islam: Philosophy and Orthodoxy. revised ed. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Riggs, Wayne. 2007. Why Epistemologists Are so Down on their Luck. Synthese 158 (3): 336–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sosa, Ernest. 1994. Virtue Perspectivism: A response to Foley and Fumerton. Philosophical Issues 5: 29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. ———. 2004. Two False Dichotomies: Foundationalism/Coherentism and Internalism/Externalism. In Pyrrhonian Skepticism, ed. Walter Sinnott-Armstrong. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 2007. A Virtue Epistemology: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Swinburne, Richard. 2007. Revelation: From Metaphor to Analogy. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wahlberg, Mats. 2014. Revelation as Testimony: A Philosophical-Theological Study. Michigan/Cambridge: Eerdmans Publishing.Google Scholar
  22. Wolterstorff, Nicholas. 1995. Divine Discourse: Philosophical Reflections on the Claim that God Speaks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zagzebsky, L. 1996. Virtues of the Mind: An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zagzebsky, Linda. 2009. On Epistemology. Independence: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  25. ———. 2014. Trust. In Virtues and Their Vices, ed. Kevin Timpe and Craig A. Boyd, 270–283. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Ashraf Adeel
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyKutztown University of PennsylvaniaKutztownUSA

Personalised recommendations