Advertisement

Stroke Care and Mechanical Thrombectomy in Developing Countries

  • Jorge A. RoaEmail author
  • Sheila C. Ouriques Martins
  • Francisco Jose Mont’Alverne
Chapter

Abstract

Stroke is the second cause of death in most developing countries, and approximately 10% of cases are people younger than 45 years old. Several studies have shown that stroke units, timely use of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA), and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for selected patients are not only indicated but also cost-effective in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Although most studies have been conducted in developed countries, over 80% of all stroke deaths in the world occur in developing countries. In this chapter, we provide an assessment of the status of stroke care and the use of MT to treat AIS in low- and medium-income countries.

Keywords

Mechanical thrombectomy Endovascular treatment Acute ischemic stroke South America Eastern Europe Africa Asia Low-income countries Developing countries 

References

  1. 1.
    Feigin VL, Norrving B, Mensah GA. Global burden of stroke. Circ Res. 2017;120(3):439–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    GBD 2016 Lifetime Risk of Stroke Collaborators, et al. Global, regional, and country-specific lifetime risks of stroke, 1990 and 2016. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(25):2429–37.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Feigin VL, et al. Update on the global burden of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke in 1990–2013: the GBD 2013 study. Neuroepidemiology. 2015;45(3):161–76.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schwamm LH, et al. Recommendations for the implementation of telehealth in cardiovascular and stroke care: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135(7):e24–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Roth GA, et al. Demographic and epidemiologic drivers of global cardiovascular mortality. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(14):1333–41.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Silva GS, et al. The status of telestroke in the United States: a survey of currently active stroke telemedicine programs. Stroke. 2012;43(8):2078–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Solenski NJ. Telestroke. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2018;28(4):551–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Martins SC, et al. Past, present, and future of stroke in middle-income countries: the Brazilian experience. Int J Stroke. 2013;8(Suppl A100):106–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Massaro AR. Stroke in Brazil: a South America perspective. Int J Stroke. 2006;1(2):113–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sposato LA, et al. Quality of ischemic stroke care in emerging countries: the Argentinian National Stroke Registry (ReNACer). Stroke. 2008;39(11):3036–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hoffmeister L, et al. Performance measures for in-hospital care of acute ischemic stroke in public hospitals in Chile. BMC Neurol. 2013;13:23.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Davalos LF, Málaga G. [The cerebrovascular accident in Peru: a prevalent forgotten and unattended disease]. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2014;31(2):400–1.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Malaga G, et al. [Stroke in Peru: current status and prospects for clinical research]. Acta Med Peru. 2018;35(1):51–4.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Scherle-Matamoros C, et al. [Delay in the arrival of ischemic stroke patients at a tertiary hospital in Ecuador]. Rev Ecuat Neurol. 2018;27(1):51–5.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Preve Cocco F, Gaye A, Hackembruch HJ. Cohort of patients with ischemic stroke – thrombolyzed and thrombectomy mechanically candidates- ACV Unit – Hospital de Clinicas (March period 2014–16) – Uruguay. Rev Urug Med Interna. 2016;1(2):35–44.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ouriques Martins SC, et al. Priorities to reduce the burden of stroke in Latin American countries. Lancet Neurol. 2019 April 24;  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30068-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wahlgren N, et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke in the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST): an observational study. Lancet. 2007;369(9558):275–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lenti L, et al. Stroke care in Central Eastern Europe: current problems and call for action. Int J Stroke. 2013;8(5):365–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Czlonkowska A, et al. Eligibility of stroke units in Poland for administration of intravenous thrombolysis. Eur J Neurol. 2006;13(3):220–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Urimubenshi G, et al. Stroke care in Africa: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Stroke. 2018;13(8):797–805.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Baatiema L, et al. Towards best practice in acute stroke care in Ghana: a survey of hospital services. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):108.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ossou-Nguiet PM, et al. Accessibility to rt-PA in Sub-Saharan Africa, Congolese stroke unit experience: call for an urgent action. Int J Stroke. 2016;11(2):NP30–1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pandian J, et al. Stroke and thrombolysis in developing countries. Int J Stroke. 2007;2(1):17–26.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Regenhardt RW, et al. Opportunities for intervention: stroke treatments, disability and mortality in urban Tanzania. Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 August 28;  https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzy188.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Suwanwela NC, Phanthumchinda K, Likitjaroen Y. Thrombolytic therapy in acute ischemic stroke in Asia: the first prospective evaluation. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2006;108(6):549–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dharmasaroja PA, Muengtaweepongsa S, Kommarkg U. Implementation of Telemedicine and Stroke Network in thrombolytic administration: comparison between walk-in and referred patients. Neurocrit Care. 2010;13(1):62–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gafurov BG. Zakhidov A. [An experience of intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy of ischemic stroke in Uzbek republic center of emergency care]. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2005 (Suppl 15):28–31.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Srivastava PV, et al. Telestroke a viable option to improve stroke care in India. Int J Stroke. 2014;9(Suppl A100):133–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pandian JD, et al. Is intravenous thrombolysis feasible in a developing country? Cerebrovasc Dis. 2005;20(2):134–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Owais M, et al. Acute ischemic stroke thrombolysis with tenecteplase: an institutional experience from South India. Ann Afr Med. 2018;17(2):90–3.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ramakrishnan TCR, et al. Efficacy and safety of intravenous tenecteplase bolus in acute ischemic stroke: results of two open-label, multicenter trials. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2018;18(5):387–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Amiri A, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of tissue plasminogen activator in acute ischemic stroke in Iran. J Med Econ. 2018;21(3):282–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pontes-Neto OM, et al. Brazilian guidelines for endovascular treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2017;75(1):50–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Polish Thrombectomy, I, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy in acute stroke – five years of experience in Poland. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2017;51(5):339–46.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shan W, et al. General anesthesia may have similar outcomes with conscious sedation in thrombectomy patients with acute ischemic stroke: a real-world registry in China. Eur Neurol. 2018;80(1–2):7–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Brinjikji W, et al. Socioeconomic disparities in the utilization of mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke in US hospitals. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35(3):553–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cabral NL, et al. Intravenous rtPA versus mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: a historical cohort in Joinville, Brazil. eNeurologicalSci. 2016;5:1–6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Nakiri GS, et al. Experience on mechanical thrombectomy for acute stroke treatment in a Brazilian University Hospital. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;26(3):532–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Reyes P et al. [Emergency endovascular management of ischemic stroke. Experience in 104 patients]. Rev Med Chile. 2018. (146):708–716.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Achi Arteaga J, et al. [Mechanical thrombectomy: first choice therapeutical approach in acute ischemic stroke. Analysis of benefits and results]. Rev Chil Neurocirugía. 2016;(42):41–4.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Colla Machado P, et al. [Mechanic thrombolysis in the treatment of isquemic stroke: experience at a high-complexity medical center in Argentina]. Neurología Argentina. 2016;8(3):145–51.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Muñoz J, et al. [Mechanical thrombectomy in patients with isquemic stroke: case series in a Colombian reference center]. Acta Neurol Colombiana. 2017;33(2):68–73.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Crosa R, et al. “Y-stent retriever”: a new rescue technique for refractory large-vessel occlusions? J Neurosurg. 2018;128(5):1349–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Stevens E, et al. The burden of stroke in Europe: Report. King’s College London for The Stroke Alliance for Europe (SAFE). 2017; Available online at: https://www.stroke.org.uk/sites/default/files/theburdenofstrokeineuropereport.pdf.
  45. 45.
    Volny O, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy performs similarly in real world practice: a 2016 nationwide study from the Czech Republic. J Neurointerv Surg. 2018;10(8):741–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Mansour OY, Ali AMI, Megahed M. Primary endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke using stent retrievers: initial Egyptian experience. J Vasc Interv Neurol. 2017;9(6):20–5.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gross BA, et al. Dump the pump: manual aspiration thrombectomy (MAT) with a syringe is technically effective, expeditious, and cost-efficient. J Neurointerv Surg. 2018;10(4):354–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Froehler MT. Comparison of vacuum pressures and forces generated by different catheters and pumps for aspiration thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. Interv Neurol. 2017;6(3–4):199–206.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Diegoli H, Cabral N, Magalhae SP. Real-world cost and cost-effectiveness of thrombectomy in Brazil. Manuscript in process.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Pan Y, et al. Cost-effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy within 6 hours of acute ischaemic stroke in China. BMJ Open. 2018;8(2):e018951.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Langhorne P, de Villiers L, Pandian JD. Applicability of stroke-unit care to low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11(4):341–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Pandian JD, et al. Knowledge of stroke among stroke patients and their relatives in Northwest India. Neurol India. 2006;54(2):152–6; discussion 156.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wang S, et al. [Evaluation of the factors leading to delay from stroke onset to arrival at hospital]. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2002;41(11):728–31.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Saengsuwan J, Suangpho P, Tiamkao S. Knowledge of stroke risk factors and warning signs in patients with recurrent stroke or recurrent transient ischaemic attack in Thailand. Neurol Res Int. 2017;2017:8215726.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Misbach J, Ali W. Stroke in Indonesia: a first large prospective hospital-based study of acute stroke in 28 hospitals in Indonesia. J Clin Neurosci. 2001;8(3):245–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Philip-Ephraim EE, et al. Factors associated with prehospital delay among stroke patients in a developing African country. Int J Stroke. 2015;10(4):E39.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Gongora-Rivera F, et al. Difference in stroke knowledge between rural and urban communities in a developing country after community-based stroke educational campaigns: results from a cross-sectional study. Neuroepidemiology. 2018;51(3–4):224–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Braga Neto P, et al. Predictors of low complexity emergency care units (UPA 24h): utilization by patients with stroke symptoms. Arquivos de Neuropsiquiatria. 2018;76: Abstract presentation in the XXVIII Brazilian Congress of Neurology, TL 36, October 11–18, São Paulo, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Lindsay P, et al. World Stroke Organization global stroke services guidelines and action plan. Int J Stroke. 2014;9(Suppl A100):4–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Wiacek M, et al. Single-center experience of stent retriever thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2017;51(1):12–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jorge A. Roa
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sheila C. Ouriques Martins
    • 2
  • Francisco Jose Mont’Alverne
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Neurology and NeurosurgeryUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and ClinicsIowa CityUSA
  2. 2.Department of NeurologyHospital de Clinicas de Porto AlegrePorto AlegreBrazil
  3. 3.Department of Interventional NeuroradiologyGeneral Hospital of FortalezaFortalezaBrazil

Personalised recommendations