Advertisement

Functional Responsibilities in Subsidiary Role Studies: Literature Overview

  • Marlena Dzikowska
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter provides an extensive overview of studies of a subsidiary’s roles. While concentrating on the functional responsibilities of a subsidiary, it presents various approaches to this issue. It refers to resource- and configuration-oriented research, discusses responsibility-oriented subsidiary role studies, and focuses on the latest analytical solution to the functional responsibilities of subsidiaries, namely, the subsidiary strategic role concept. Research on subsidiary roles is often perceived as homogeneous. However, the findings of this chapter indicate that it remains diversified in terms of the approaches applied to the functional responsibilities of a subsidiary. The modern approach toward the subsidiary strategic role concept opens new avenues for studies of the determinants of a subsidiary’s functional responsibilities.

Keywords

Subsidiary role Functional responsibilities Subsidiary evolution Subsidiary strategic role MNE 

References

  1. Achcaoucaou, Fariza, Paloma Miravitlles, and Fidel León-Darderb. 2014. Knowledge sharing and subsidiary R&D mandate development: A matter of dual embeddedness. International Business Review 23 (1): 76–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anand, Rahul, Saurabh Mishra, and Nikola Spatafora. 2012. Structural transformation and the sophistication of production. IMF working paper 12/59, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  3. Bartlett, Christopher A., and Sumantra Ghoshal. 1986. Tap your subsidiaries for global reach. Harvard Business Review 64 (6): 87–94.Google Scholar
  4. Birkinshaw, Julian M., and Allen J. Morrison. 1995. Configurations of strategy and structure in subsidiaries of multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies 26 (4): 729–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Birkinshaw, Julian M., and Torben Pedersen. 2009. Strategy and management in MNE subsidiaries. In The Oxford handbook of international business, ed. Alan M. Rugman, 2nd ed., 367–389. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bouquet, Ciril, and Julian M. Birkinshaw. 2008. Weight versus voice: How foreign subsidiaries gain attention from corporate headquarters. The Academy of Management Journal 51 (3): 577–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burger, Anže, Björn Jindra, Philipp Marek, and Matija Rojec. 2018. Functional upgrading and value capture of multinational subsidiaries. Journal of International Management 24 (2): 108–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cantwell, John, and Ram Mudambi. 2005. MNE competence-creating subsidiary mandates. Strategic Management Journal 26 (12): 1109–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cavanagh, Andrew, and Susan Freeman. 2012. The development of subsidiary roles in the motor vehicle manufacturing industry. International Business Review 21 (4): 602–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Beule, Filip. 2011. Subsidiary strategic evolution in China. In Entrepreneurship in the global firm, Progress in international business research, ed. Alain Verbeke, T. Ana, and Rob Van Tulder, vol. 6, 199–222. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Delany, Ed. 2000. Strategic development of the multinational subsidiary through subsidiary initiative-taking. Long Range Planning 33 (2): 220–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dörrenbächer, Christoph, and Jens Gammelgaard. 2006. Subsidiary role development: The effect of micro-political headquarters–subsidiary negotiations on the product, market and value-added scope of foreign-owned subsidiaries. Journal of International Management 12 (3): 266–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. ———. 2010. Multinational corporations, inter-organizational networks and subsidiary charter removals. Journal of World Business 45 (3): 206–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dzikowska, Marlena, and Ulf Andersson. 2018. A dynamic framework of subsidiary strategic roles. Paper presented at the annual meeting for the European International Business Academy, Poznań, December 13–15.Google Scholar
  15. Enright, Michael J., and Venkat Subramanian. 2007. An organizing framework for MNC subsidiary typologies. Management International Review 47 (6): 895–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferdows, Kasra. 1997. Making the most of foreign factories. Harvard Business Review 75 (2): 73–88.Google Scholar
  17. Ghoshal, Sumantra. 1997. Of cakes, clothes, emperors and obituaries. In International business: An emerging vision, ed. Brian Toyne and Douglas Nigh, 361–376. Columbia: University of South California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Giuliani, Elisa, Sara Gorgoni, Christina Günther, and Roberta Rabellotti. 2014. Emerging versus advanced country MNEs investing in Europe: A typology of subsidiary global–local connections. International Business Review 23 (4): 680–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gupta, Anil K., and Vijay Govindarajan. 1991. Knowledge flows and the structure of control within multinational corporations. Academy of Management Review 16 (4): 768–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harzing, Anne-Wil. 2000. An empirical test and extension of the Bartlett and Ghoshal typology of multinational companies. Journal of International Business Studies 31 (1): 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harzing, Anne-Wil, and Niels G. Noorderhaven. 2006. Knowledge flows in MNCs: An empirical test and extension of Gupta & Govindarajan’s typology of subsidiary roles. International Business Review 15 (3): 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hausmann, Ricardo, Jason Hwang, and Dani Rodrik. 2007. What you export matters. Journal of Economic Growth 12 (1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hobday, Michael, and Howard Rush. 2006. Upgrading the technological capabilities of foreign transnational subsidiaries in developing countries: The case of electronics in Thailand. Research Policy 36 (9): 1335–1356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hogenbirk, Annelies E., and Hans L. van Kranenburg. 2006. Roles of foreign owned subsidiaries in a small economy. International Business Review 15 (1): 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jarillo, J. Carlos, and Jon I. Martinez. 1990. Different roles for subsidiaries: The case of multinational corporations in Spain. Strategic Management Journal 11 (7): 501–512.Google Scholar
  26. Jensen, Peter D., and Torben Pedersen. 2011. The economic geography of offshoring: The fit between activities and local context. Journal of Management Studies 48 (2): 352–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jindra, Björn. 2005. A strategy view on knowledge in the MNE – Integrating subsidiary roles and knowledge flows. Journal of Economics and Business 8 (1–2): 43–71.Google Scholar
  28. Lall, Sanjaya, John Weiss, and Jinkang Zhang. 2006. The sophistication of exports: A new measure of product characteristics. World Development 34 (2): 222–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leong, Siew Meng, and Chin Tiong Tan. 1993. Managing across Borders: An empirical assessment of the Bartlett and Ghoshal (1989) typology. Journal of International Business Studies 24 (3): 449–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Malnight, Thomas W. 1995. Globalization of an ethnocentric firm: An evolutionary perspective. Strategic Management Journal 16 (2): 119–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Manolopoulos, Dimitris. 2008. A systematic review of the literature and theoretical analysis of subsidiary roles. Journal of Transnational Management 13 (1): 23–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marcati, Alberto. 1989. Configuration and coordination: The role of US subsidiaries in the international network of Italian multinationals. Management International Review 29 (3): 35–50.Google Scholar
  33. Mudambi, Ram. 2008. Location, control and innovation in knowledge-intensive industries. Journal of Economic Geography 8 (5): 699–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mudambi, Ram, Torben Pedersen, and Ulf Andersson. 2014. How subsidiaries gain power in multinational corporations. Journal of World Business 49 (1): 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nobel, Robert, and Julian M. Birkinshaw. 1998. Innovation n multinational corporations: Control and communication patterns in International R&D Operations. Strategic Management Journal 19 (5): 479–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pananond, Pavida. 2013. Where do we go from Here?: Globalizing subsidiaries moving up the value chain. Journal of International Management 19 (3): 207–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Porter, Michael E. 1985. The competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  38. Qu, Riliang. 2007. The role of market orientation in the business success of MNCs’ UK subsidiaries. Management Decision 45 (7): 1181–1192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rugman, Alan M. 2001. The end of globalization: Why global strategy is a myth & how to profit from the realities of regional markets. New York: Amacom.Google Scholar
  40. Rugman, Alan, and Alain Verbeke. 2001. Subsidiary-specific advantages in multinational enterprises. Strategic Management Journal 22 (3): 237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. ———. 2004. A perspective on regional and global strategies of multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies 35 (1): 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rugman, Alan M., Alain Verbeke, and Wenlong Yuan. 2011. Re-conceptualizing Bartlett and Ghoshal’s classification of national subsidiary roles in the multinational enterprise. Journal of Management Studies 48 (2): 253–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sass, Magdolna, and Andrea Szalavetz. 2013. Crisis and upgrading: The case of the Hungarian automotive and electronics sectors. Europe-Asia Studies 65 (3): 489–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schmid, Stefan. 2004. The roles of foreign subsidiaries in network MNCs – A critical review of the literature and some directions for future research. In European research on foreign direct investment and international human resource management, ed. Jorma Larimo and Sami Rumpunen, 237–255. Vaasa: Vaasa yliopiston Julkaisuja.Google Scholar
  45. Schmid, Stefan, and Andrea Daniel. 2007. Are subsidiary roles a matter of perception?: A review of the literature and avenues for future research. ESCP-EAP working paper, Berlin.Google Scholar
  46. Schmid, Stefan, Iris Bäurle, and Michael Kutschker. 1998. Tochtergesellschaften in international tätigen Unternehmungen – Ein “State-of-the-Art” unterschiedlicher Rollentypologien. Diskussionsbeitrag (104), Katholische Universität Eichstätt: Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät Ingolstadt.Google Scholar
  47. Schmid, Stefan, Philipp Grosche, and Ulrike Mayrhofer. 2016. Configuration and coordination of international marketing activities. International Business Review 25 (2): 535–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Scott, Pamela, and Patrick T. Gibbons. 2011. Emerging threats for MNC subsidiaries and the cycle of decline. Journal of Business Strategy 32 (1): 34–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Taggart, James H. 1997. Autonomy and procedural justice: A framework for evaluating subsidiary strategy. Journal of International Business Studies 28 (1): 51–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. ———. 1998. Strategy shifts in MNC subsidiaries. Strategic Management Journal 19 (7): 663–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tippmann, Esther, Pamela Sharkey Scott, Marty Reilly, and Donal O’Brien. 2018. Subsidiary coopetition competence: Navigating subsidiary evolution in the multinational corporation. Journal of World Business 53 (4): 540–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tsai, Ming-Ten, Ming-Chu Yu, and Kuo-Wei Lee. 2006. Relationships between subsidiary strategic roles and organizational configuration: The case of Taiwanese multinational companies. International Journal of Commerce and Management 16 (1): 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vereecke, Ann, and Roland Van Dierdonck. 2002. The strategic role of the plant: Testing Ferdows’s model. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 22 (5/6): 492–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vereecke, Ann, Roland Van Dierdonck, and Arnoud De Meyer. 2006. A typology of plants in global manufacturing networks. Management Science 52 (11): 1737–1750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vereecke, Ann, Arnoud De Meyer, and Roland Van Dierdonck. 2008. The strategic role of the plant in international networks: A longitudinal study. Cambridge Judge Business School working paper series 09/2008.Google Scholar
  56. Wang, Jue, Xiaming Liu, and Xiaoying Li. 2009. A dual-role typology of multinational subsidiaries. International Business Review 18 (6): 578–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. White, Roderick E., and Thomas A. Poynter. 1984. Strategies for foreign-owned subsidiaries in Canada. Business Quarterly 49 (2): 59–69.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marlena Dzikowska
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of International CompetitivenessPoznań University of Economics and BusinessPoznańPoland

Personalised recommendations