CSR Reporting Practices of Lithuanian and Italian Academic Institutions

  • Ligita Šimanskienė
  • Jurgita Paužuolienė
  • Erika Župerkienė
  • Mariantonietta Fiore
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Cross-disciplinary Business Research, In Association with EuroMed Academy of Business book series (PSCDBRAEAB)


The UN Global Compact (UNGC) is a global voluntary initiative that aims at supporting sustainable development by creating a system of companies and stakeholders for knowledge and experience transfer. The purpose of this chapter is to analyse the corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports of Lithuanian and Italian academic institutions, which participate in the UNGC context. In the study, the authors carried out content analysis, statistical analysis and qualitative research methods to investigate 14 social responsibility reports of academic institutions submitted in the UNGC (7 institutions from Lithuania and 7 from Italia). The findings highlight Lithuanian and Italian academic institutions which have implemented the serious CSR process, albeit with some differences. Implementation of the social responsibility protocol can bridge theory and practice, and can provide valuable insights into partnerships thanks to synergies among public and private sectors as well as the community.


  1. Ackers, B. (2014). Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting: What Boards of Directors Need to Know. Corporate Board: Role, Duties & Composition, 10(3), 38–59.Google Scholar
  2. Ahmad, N. B., Rashis, A., & Gow, J. (2017). Board Independence and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Reporting in Malaysia. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 11(2), 61–85. Scholar
  3. Alzyoud, S. A., & Bani-Hani, K. (2015). Social Responsibility in Higher Education Institutions: Application Case from the Middle East. European Scientific Journal, 11(8), 122–129.Google Scholar
  4. Arevalo, J. A., & Aravind, D. (2017). Strategic Outcomes in Voluntary CSR: Reporting Economic and Reputational Benefits in Principles-Based Initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(1), 201–217.Google Scholar
  5. Bendoraitiene, E., & Šimkutė, E. (2016). The Assessment of CSR Disclosure in Large Lithuania Companies. Applied Economics: Systematic Research, 10(1), 43–63.Google Scholar
  6. Bitanga, J., & Bridwell, L. (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility and the United Nations Global Compact. Accessed 23 Dec 2018.
  7. Blowfield, M., & Murray, A. (2008). Corporate Responsibility: A Critical Interdiction. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.Google Scholar
  9. Branco, M., & Rodrigues, L. (2006). Communication of Corporate Social Responsibility by Portuguese Banks: A Legitimacy Theory Perspective. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 11(3), 232–248.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, J. A., Clark, C., & Buono, A. F. (2018). The United Nations Global Compact: Engaging Implicit and Explicit CSR for Global Governance. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(4), 721–734.Google Scholar
  11. Cetindamar, D., & Husoy, K. (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility Practices and Environmentally Responsible Behavior: The Case of the United Nations Global Compact. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(2), 163–176.Google Scholar
  12. Chatzoglou, P., Chatzoudes, D., Amarantou, V., & Aggelidis, V. (2017). Examining the Antecedents and the Effects of CSR Implementation: An Explanatory Study. EuroMed Journal of Business, 12(2), 189–206.Google Scholar
  13. Christie, K., & Hanlon, R. J. (2014). Sustaining Human Rights and Responsibility: The United Nations Global Compact and Myanmar. Athens Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1), 9–20.Google Scholar
  14. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Demetriou, M., Thrassou, A., & Papasolomou, I. (2019). Beyond Teaching CSR and Ethics in Tertiary Education: The Case of the University of Nicosia, Cyprus (EU). World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 14(1–2), 97–122. Scholar
  16. European Commission. (2018). Accessed 20 Dec 2018.
  17. Feldman, P. M., Bahamonde, R. A., & Bellido, I. V. (2014). A new Approach for Measuring Corporate Reputation. Revista de Administração de Empresas São Paulo, 54(1), 53–66.Google Scholar
  18. Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S., & Ruiz, S. (2014). Effect of Stakeholders’ Pressure on Transparency of Sustainability Reports Within the GRI Framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(1), 53–63.Google Scholar
  19. Fiore, M., Galati, A., Crescimanno, M., Contò, F., Giacomarra, M., & Tinervia, S. (2016). Managerial Suggestions to Sustainable Market Choices: A Business Profitability Assessment on the Adoption of Voluntary Certification in the Wine Industry of the Italian “Mezzogiorno” Regions. Quality-Access to Success, 17(154), 71–78.Google Scholar
  20. Giannarakis, G., Litinas, N., & Sariannidis, N. (2011). Evaluation of Corporate Social Responsibility Performance Standards. African Journal of Business Management, 5(17), 7367–7374.Google Scholar
  21. Jarosławska-Sobór, S. (2017). Do We Need Social Reports? New Challenge for Corporate Social Responsibility. Marketing of Scientific and Research Organizations, 26(4), 81–100.Google Scholar
  22. Junaid, N., Leung, O., & Buono, A. (2015). Institutionalization or Decoupling? An Exploratory Analysis of the UN Global Compact LEAD Initiative. Business and Society Review, 120(4), 491–518.Google Scholar
  23. Juščius, V., & Griauslytė, J. (2014). Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in Lithuanian Business Practice. Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, 69, 55–70.Google Scholar
  24. Juščius, V., & Šneiderienė, A. (2013). Įmonių socialinės atsakomybės įtaka regioninei plėtrai. Regional Formation and Development Studies, 1(9), 66–78.Google Scholar
  25. Kell, G. (2013). 12 Years Later: Reflections on the Growth of the UN Global Compact. Business & Society, 52(1), 31–52.Google Scholar
  26. Kitora, Y., & Okuda, S. Y. (2017). The Effects and Determinants of Extensive Disclosure: Evidence from Japan. Corporate Ownership and Control, 5(2), 212–224.Google Scholar
  27. Lithuanian Responsible Business Association (LRBA). (2018). Accessed 10 Dec 2018.
  28. Lizarzaburu, E. R., & del Brío, J. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Reputation in Emerging Countries: An Analysis of the Peruvian Banking Sector. In D. Vrontis et al. (Eds.), Innovation and Capacity Building, Palgrave Studies in Cross-disciplinary Business Research, In Association with EuroMed Academy of Business. Scholar
  29. Melanthiou, Y., Thrassou, A., & Vrontis, D. (2017). A Value-Based Transcription of Student Choices into Higher Education Branding Practices. Global Business and Economics Review, 19(2), 121–136.Google Scholar
  30. Nyarku, K. M., & Hinson, R. E. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting of Banks Operating in Ghana African. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(2), 19–36.Google Scholar
  31. Odriozla, M. D., & Baraiber-Diaz, E. (2017). Is Corporate Reputation Associated with Quality of CSR Reporting? Evidence from Spain. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24, 121–132. Scholar
  32. Rasche, A. (2009). A Necessary Supplement: What the United Nations Global Compact Is and Is Not. Business & Society, 48(4), 511–537.Google Scholar
  33. Rasche, A., Waddoch, S., & McIntosh, M. (2013). The United Nations Global Compact Retrospect and Prospect. Business & Society, 52(1), 6–30.Google Scholar
  34. Salehi, M., Lari DashtBayaz, M., & Khorashadizadeh, S. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility and Future Financial Performance: Evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange. EuroMed Journal of Business, 13(3), 351–371.Google Scholar
  35. Searcy, C., & Buslovich, R. (2014). Corporate Perspectives on the Development and Use of Sustainability Reports. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(2), 149–169.Google Scholar
  36. Sethi, P. S., Martell, T. F., & Demir, M. (2017). Enhancing the Role and Effectiveness of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Reports: The Missing Element of Content Verification and Integrity Assurance. Journal of Business Ethics, 144, 59–82.Google Scholar
  37. Shams, R., & Thrassou, A. (2018). Theorisation and Research Project Development: Bridging the Industry–Academia Research Gap. Industry and Higher Education, 1–4. Scholar
  38. Smith, D. (2003). Five Principles for Research Ethics. Monitor on Psychology, 34(1), 56.Google Scholar
  39. Spyra, Z. (2017). Environmental Aspects as an Area of CSR and Building the Image of Retailers’ Private Labels. Marketing of Scientific and Research Organizations, 26(4), 135–160.Google Scholar
  40. Thrassou, A., Orfanos, D., & Tsoukatos, E. (2018). In D. Vrontis et al. (Eds.), Innovation and Capacity Building, Palgrave Studies in Cross-disciplinary Business Research, In Association with EuroMed Academy of Business. Scholar
  41. Tureac, C. E., Turtureanu, A. G., Bordean, I., & Modiga, G. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainable Development. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Economica, 5(1), 111–118.Google Scholar
  42. UN Global Compact. (2017). Making Global Goals Local Business. Accessed 5 Dec 2018.
  43. United Nations Global Compact. (2018). Accessed 5 Dec 2018.
  44. Valackienė, A., & Mikėnė, S. (2008). Sociologinis tyrimas: Metodologija ir atlikimo metodika. Kaunas: Technologija.Google Scholar
  45. Vartiak, M. L. (2016). CSR Reporting of Companies on a Global scale/3rd Global Conference on Business Economics. Procedia Economics and Finance, 39, 176–183.Google Scholar
  46. Voegtlin, C., & Pless, N. M. (2014). Global Governance: CSR and the Role of the UN Global Compact. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(2), 179–191.Google Scholar
  47. Vrontis, D., Thrassou, A., & Melanthiou, Y. (2007). A Contemporary Higher Education Student-Choice Model for Developed Countries. Journal of Business Research, 60(9), 979–989.Google Scholar
  48. Vrontis, D., Viassone, M., & Thrassou, A. (2015). The Role and Potential of Social Networks Sites in Tertiary Education. Sinergie Italian Journal of Management, 33(97), 55–82.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ligita Šimanskienė
    • 1
  • Jurgita Paužuolienė
    • 1
  • Erika Župerkienė
    • 1
  • Mariantonietta Fiore
    • 2
  1. 1.Klaipeda UniversityKlaipėdaLithuania
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of FoggiaFoggiaItaly

Personalised recommendations