Advertisement

Boosting Publicity: Old and New Media, Deliberations, and Organic Ideology Articulation

  • Laurence L. Delina
Chapter

Abstract

Publicizing campaigns need not only be far-reaching but also empowering. Mobilization, thus, requires all forms of traditional and emergent media, at the same time that venues for iterative knowing, probing, and problem-solving and formulating and articulating an organic ideology are created and sustained. With climate denial deeply entrenched in governments and traditional mass media channels, a new hegemony that support emancipatory and transformative climate actions can be promoted using new channels provided by social media; albeit ensuring authentic participation. Strengthening proven modes of face-to-face public engagement remains important. Authentic and influential deliberations can be tapped not only to increase public knowledge but also to open up a culture for reflexive problem solving, which has long-lasting effects to people.

Keywords

Publicity Mass media Social media Climate communication Climate denial Authentic participation Deliberation Intellectual organization Organic intellectuals 

References

  1. Agyeman, J., Doppelt, B., Lynn, K., & Hatic, H. (2007). The climate-justice link: Communicating risk with low-income and minority audiences. In S. C. Moser & L. Dilling (Eds.), Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change (pp. 119–138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bacon, W. (2013). Climate Science in Australian Newspapers. Sydney: The Australian Centre for Independent Journalism.Google Scholar
  3. Bacon, W., & Nash, C. (2012). Playing the media game: The relative (in)visibility of coal industry interests in media reporting of coal as a climate change issue in Australia. Journalism Studies, 13, 243–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett, W. L., & Sagerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15, 37–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boykoff, M. T. (2011). Who Speaks for the Climate? Making Sense of Media Reporting on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boykoff, M. T., & Boykoff, J. M. (2004). Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change, 14, 125–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, J. M. (1977). Gandhi and Civil Disobedience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, J. M. (1989). Gandhi: Prisoner of Hope. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Carson, L. (2011). Dilemmas, disasters and deliberative democracy: Getting the public back into policy. Griffith Reviews, 32, 25–32.Google Scholar
  10. Cruz-Del Rosario, T., & Dorsey, J. M. (2013). Street, shrine, square, and soccer pitch: Comparative protest spaces in Asia and the Middle East. Air & Space Power Journal - Africa & Francophonie, 4, 80–96.Google Scholar
  11. Delina, L. (2018). Climate mobilizations and democracy: The promise of scaling community energy transitions in a deliberative system. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908x.2018.1525287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dryzek, J. (2000). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Dryzek, J., Belgiorno-Nettis, L., Carson, L., Hartz-Karp, J., Lubensky, R., Marsh, I., et al. (2009). The Australian citizens’ parliament: A world first. Journal of Public Deliberation, 5, 1–7.Google Scholar
  14. Dunlap, R., & McCright, A. (2011). Organized climate change denial. In J. Dryzek & R. Schlosberg (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society (pp. 144–160). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Enriquez, E. L. (2006). Media as site of social struggle: The role of Philippine radio and television in the EDSA Revolt of 1986. Plaridel, 3, 53–82.Google Scholar
  16. Fairclough, A. (1987). To Redeem the Soul of America: The Southern Christian Leadership Conference and Martin Luther King, Jr. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  17. Featherstone, H., Weitkamp, E., Ling, K., & Burnett, F. (2009). Defining issue-based publics for public engagement: Climate change as a case study. Public Understanding of Science, 18, 94–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Feldman, L., Maibach, E. W., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2013). Climate on cable: The nature and impact of global warming coverage on Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 17, 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Girard, M., Poletta, F., & Stark, D. (2003). Policy Made Public: Technologies of Deliberation and Representation in Rebuilding Lower Manhattan. New York: Center on Organizational Innovation, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  20. Gonzales, H. (1988). Mass media and the spiral of silence: The Philippines from Marcos to Aquino. Journal of Communication, 38, 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hodges, H. E., & Stocking, G. (2016). A pipeline of tweets: Environmental movements’ use of Twitter in response to the Keystone XL pipeline. Environmental Politics, 25, 223–247.Google Scholar
  22. Horsfield, B. (1995). Communication for social revolution. Journal of International Communication, 2, 52–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnson, T. (2014, September 21). Sunday news shows ignore historic climate march. Media Matters for America.Google Scholar
  24. Klandermans, B., van Stekelenberg, J., Damen, M. L., et al. (2014). Mobilization without organization: The case of unaffiliated demonstrators. European Sociological Review, 30, 702–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lang, A. (2007). But is it for real? The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly as a model of state-sponsored-citizen empowerment. Politics & Society, 35, 35–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Christiano, T., Fung, A., Parkinson, J., et al. (2012). A systemic approach to deliberative democracy. In J. Parkinson & J. Mansbridge (Eds.), Deliberative systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale (pp. 1–26). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Martin, B. (2007). Justice Ignited: The Dynamics of Backfire. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  28. McCauley, D., Heffron, R., Pavlenko, M., Rehner, R., & Holmes, R. (2016). Energy justice in the Arctic: Implications for energy infrastructural development in the Arctic. Energy Research & Social Science, 16, 141–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mirkinson, J. (2014, September 22). TV news misses yet another opportunity to cover climate change. The Huffington Post.Google Scholar
  30. Moyer, B., McAllister, J., Finley, M. L., & Soifer, S. (2001). Doing Democracy: The MAP Model for Organizing Social Movements. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Niemeyer, S., & Jennstål, J. (2018). Scaling up deliberative effects: Applying lessons of mini-publics. In A. Bächtinger, J. Dryzek, J. Mansbridge, & M. E. Warren (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy (pp. 329–347). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Niemeyer, S., Hobson, K., Russel, J., Ord-Evans, I., Boswell, J., & dos Santos, E. (2011). Participant Recommendations and Report: Climate Change and the Public Sphere Project (Centre for Deliberative Democracy & Global Governance Working Paper 2011/4). Canberra, Australia: Centre for Deliberative Democracy & Global Governance, Australian National University.Google Scholar
  33. Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2012). Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. New York: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
  34. Orr, D. W. (2013). Governance in the long emergency. In E. Assadourian & T. Prugh (Eds.), State of the World 2013: Is Sustainability Still Possible? (pp. 279–291). Washington, DC: Island Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. People’s Climate March. (2014). Wrap Up. http://bit.ly/1qxNEZt.
  36. Ramos, V., Jr. (1982). The concepts of ideology, hegemony, and organic intellectuals in Gramsci’s Marxism. Theoretical Review, 27. https://www.marxists.org/history/erol/periodicals/theoretical-review/1982301.htm.
  37. Schlosberg, D., & Dryzek, J. S. (2002). Digital democracy: Authentic or virtual? Organization & Environment, 15, 332–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Singhal, A. (2010). The Mahatma’s message: Gandhi’s contributions to the art and science of communication. China Media Research, 6, 103–106.Google Scholar
  39. Slaughter, A.-M. (2005). A New World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Thomas, T. (2013, December 19). A room full of eco-idiots. The Daily Telegraph.Google Scholar
  41. Walgrave, S., & Klandermans, B. (2010). Open and closed mobilization patterns: the role of channels and ties. In S. Walgrave & D. Rucht (Eds.), The World Says No to War: Demonstrations Against the War on Iraq (pp. 169–193). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Weber, T. (1997). On the Salt March. New Delhi: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laurence L. Delina
    • 1
  1. 1.Boston UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations