• Jeremy BaskinEmail author


This concluding Chapter draws the key strands of the book’s argument together and reflects on what’s different about solar geoengineering’s (SGE) past and present, what’s constraining its normalisation, and what’s at stake in any decision to embrace it? Also explored are a number of the implications of the book’s analysis for thinking about climate policy post-Paris and about environmentalism more generally, before considering whether SGE will ever come into being as a deployed technology and a third leg of climate policy.


  1. Anderson, K., & Peters, G. (2016). The trouble with negative emissions. Science, 354(6309), 182–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baskin, J. (2015). Paradigm dressed as epoch: The ideology of the Anthropocene. Environmental Values, 24, 9–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck, S., & Mahony, M. (2017). The IPCC and the politics of anticipation. Nature Climate Change, 7, 311–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boucher, O., et al. (2014). Rethinking climate engineering categorization in the context of climate change mitigation and adaptation. WIREs Climate Change, 5(1), 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crist, E. (2007). Beyond the climate crisis: A critique of climate change discourse. Telos, 141(Winter), 29–55.Google Scholar
  6. Cronon, W. (1995). Uncommon ground: Rethinking the human place in nature. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  7. Ebell, M. (2009). The anti-green ecologist. Retrieved January 9, 2019, from
  8. Ebell, M. (2016). Myron Ebell: Promoting sound policy for real environmental improvement. Retrieved January 15, 2019, from
  9. Ecomodernist Manifesto. (2015). Retrieved January 9, 2019, from
  10. Ellison, K. (2018, March 28). Why climate change skeptics are backing geoengineering. Wired. Retrieved January 9, 2019, from
  11. Fleming, J. R., & Jankovic, V. (2011). Revisiting Klima. Osiris, 26, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Horton, J. B., Keith, D. W., & Honegger, M. (2016). Implications of the Paris agreement for carbon dioxide removal and solar geoengineering. Harvard Project on Climate Agreements viewpoint paper, July. Retrieved January 9, 2019, from
  13. Hulme, M. (2011). Reducing the future to climate: A story of climate determinism and reductionism. Osiris, 26, 245–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hulme, M. (2014). Can science fix climate change? A case against climate engineering. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  15. Jasanoff, S. (2004). The idiom of co-production. In S. Jasanoff (Ed.), States of knowledge: The co-production of science and social order. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jasanoff, S. (2015). Future imperfect: Science, technology and the imaginations of modernity. In S. Jasanoff & S.-H. Kim (Eds.), Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power (pp. 1–33). Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Keith, D. W. (2013). A case for climate engineering. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kruger, T., Geden, O., & Rayner, S. (2016, April 26). Abandon hype in climate models. The Guardian. Retrieved January 15, 2019, from
  19. Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Lynas, M. (2011). The God Species: How the planet can survive the age of humans. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
  21. Mann, G., & Wainwright, J. (2018). Climate Leviathan: A political theory of our planetary future. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  22. Marris, E. (2011). Rambunctious Garden: Saving nature in a post-wild world. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  23. McKibben, B. (1989). The end of nature. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  24. Merchant, C. (1980). The death of nature. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  25. Minx, J. C., Lamb, W. F., Callaghan, M. W., Fuss, S., Hilaire, J., Creutzig, F., et al. (2018). Negative emissions—Part 1: Research landscape and synthesis. Environmental Research Letters, 13(6), 63001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rayner, S. (2016). What might Evans-Pritchard have made of two degrees? Anthropology Today, 32(4), 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Robock, A. (2015, September 1). A modest proposal. Huffington Post. Retrieved January 15, 2019, from
  28. Surprise, K. (2018). Preempting the second contradiction: Solar geoengineering as spatiotemporal fix. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 108(5), 1228–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change). (2015). Adoption of the Paris Agreement. FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1. Conference of the Parties, Paris, 12 December.Google Scholar
  30. Vidal, J. (2016, November 22). ‘Extraordinarily hot’ Arctic temperatures alarm scientists. The Guardian. Retrieved January 15, 2019, from
  31. Vogel, S. (2015). Thinking like a mall: Environmental philosophy after the end of nature. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Williams, R. (1983). Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society (Rev. ed.). London: Fontana.Google Scholar
  33. Williamson, P. (2016). Scrutinize CO2 removal methods. Nature, 530, 153–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wood, G. (2009, July/August). Re-engineering the Earth. The Atlantic. Retrieved January 15, 2019, from
  35. Worthy, K. (2013). Invisible nature. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Melbourne School of GovernmentUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations