The Re-emergence of Solar Geoengineering

  • Jeremy BaskinEmail author


This Chapter charts the re-emergence of solar geoengineering (SGE) into mainstream consideration as a policy option from the mid-2000s, linking this to growing concerns about climate change. The institutional assessments of SGE are analysed in depth. The most common rationales that accompanied SGE’s revival are traced, and the various ways in which it is framed, understood and imagined today are analysed. This analysis shows how geoengineering has been unable to be normalised as a respectable third leg of climate policy. It is researched and imagined but it lacks legitimacy and traction.


  1. AAS (Australian Academy of Science). (2015). The science of climate change. Canberra: Australian Academy of Science.Google Scholar
  2. AMEG (Arctic Methane Emergency Group). (2014). Press release, 4 December. Retrieved September 20, 2016, from
  3. Bala, G., & Gupta, A. (2018). India’s push for solar geoengineering. Nature, 557, 637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belter, C. W., & Seidel, D. J. (2013). A bibliometric analysis of climate engineering research. WIREs Climate Change, 4(5), 417–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernstein, S., & Ivanova, M. (2008). Institutional fragmentation and normative compromise in global environmental governance: What prospects for re-embedding? In S. Bernstein & L. W. Pauly (Eds.), Global liberalism and political order: Toward a new grand compromise? New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bickel, J. E., & Lane, L. (2009). An analysis of climate engineering as a response to climate change. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Consensus Center.Google Scholar
  7. Bickerstaff, K., Lorenzoni, I., Pidgeon, N., Poortinga, W., & Simmons, P. (2008). Reframing nuclear power in the UK energy debate: Nuclear power, climate change mitigation and radioactive waste. Public Understanding of Science, 17, 145–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bipartisan Policy Center (BPC). (2011). Geoengineering: A national strategic plan for research on the potential effectiveness, feasibility, and consequences of climate remediation technologies. Washington, DC: Bipartisan Policy Center Task Force on Climate Remediation Research.Google Scholar
  9. Blackstock, J. J., Battisti, D. S., Caldeira, K., Eardley, D. M., Katz, J. I., Keith, D. W., et al. (2009). Climate engineering responses to climate emergencies. Santa Barbara: Novim. Retrieved January 9, 2019, from
  10. Bolin, B. (2007). A history of the science and politics of climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bowen, M. (2008). Censoring science: Inside the political attack on Dr. James Hansen and the truth of global warming. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
  12. BPC. (2011). See Bipartisan Policy Center 2011.Google Scholar
  13. Branson, R. (2008). Addressing climate change: Keynote address by Sir Richard Branson. Retrieved January 9, 2019, from
  14. Bronson, D., Mooney, P., & Wetter, K. J. (2009). Retooling the planet? Climate chaos in the geoengineering age. A report prepared by ETC Group for the Swedish Society for Nature Conservation. Stockholm: Swedish Society for Nature Conservation. Retrieved January 9, 2019, from
  15. Brovkin, V., Petoukhov, V., Claussen, M., Bauer, E., Archer, D., & Jaeger, C. (2009). Geoengineering climate by stratospheric sulfur injections: Earth system vulnerability to technological failure. Climatic Change, 92(3–4), 243–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brysse, K., Oreskes, N., O’Reilly, J., & Oppenheimer, M. (2013). Climate change prediction: Erring on the side of least drama? Global Environmental Change, 23, 327–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Budyko, M. I., Golitsyn, G. S., & Izrael, Y. A. (1988 [1986]). Global climatic catastrophes. Translated from Russian by V. G. Yanuta. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  18. Cairns, R., & Stirling, A. (2014). ‘Maintaining planetary systems’ or ‘concentrating global power?’ High stakes in contending framings of climate geoengineering. Global Environmental Change, 28, 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cao, L., Gao, C.-C., & Zhao, L.-Y. (2015). Geoengineering: Basic science and ongoing research efforts in China. Advances in Climate Change Research, 6(3–4), 188–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chandler, D. L. (2007, July 21). A sunshade for the planet: If we can’t stop global warming, as a last resort, researchers are devising ways to cool the planet by shading it from the sun. New Scientist, pp. 42–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Christoff, P., & Eckersley, R. (2013). Globalization & the environment. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  22. Cicerone, R. J. (2006). Geoengineering: Encouraging research and overseeing implementation. Climatic Change, 77, 221–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Corner, A., & Pidgeon, N. (2015). Like artificial trees? The effect of framing by natural analogy on public perceptions of geoengineering. Climatic Change, 130(3), 425–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Crist, E. (2007). Beyond the climate crisis: A critique of climate change discourse. Telos, 141(Winter), 29–55.Google Scholar
  25. Crutzen, P. J. (2006). Albedo enhancement by stratospheric sulfur injections: A contribution to resolve a policy dilemma? Climatic Change, 77(3–4), 211–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dalby, S. (2009). Security and environmental change. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  27. David, L. (2007, September). Climate change: A geoengineering fix? Aerospace America, 45, 32–37.Google Scholar
  28. Dibley, B., & Neilson, B. (2010). Climate crisis and the actuarial imaginary: The war on global warming. New Formations, 69(Spring), 144–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dickinson, E. (2010, September 3). A changed climate skeptic? Foreign Policy.Google Scholar
  30. Edney, K., & Symons, J. (2014). China and the blunt temptations of geoengineering: The role of solar radiation management in China’s strategic response to climate change. The Pacific Review, 27(3), 307–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization (Special issue: ‘International Organization at Fifty: Exploration and Contestation in the Study of World Politics’), 52(4), 887–917.Google Scholar
  33. GAO (Government Accountability Office). (2010). Climate change: A coordinated strategy could focus federal geoengineering research and inform governance efforts. GAO-10-903. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accountability Office. Retrieved January 9, 2019, from
  34. GAO (Government Accountability Office). (2011). Climate engineering: Technical status, future directions, and potential responses. GAO-11-71. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accountability Office. Retrieved January 9, 2019, from
  35. Gingrich, N. (2008, June 3). Stop the green pig: Defeat the Boxer-Warner-Lieberman green pork bill capping American jobs and trading America’s future. Human Events. Retrieved January 9, 2019, from
  36. Ginzky, H., Herrmann, F., Kartschall, K., Leujak, W., Lipsius, K., Mäder, C., et al. (2011). Geoengineering: Effective climate protection or megalomania? Dessau-Roßlau: Umweltbundesamt.Google Scholar
  37. Gore, A. (2004). The climate emergency. In J. R. Lyons, H. S. Kaplan, F. Strebeigh, & K. E. Campbell (Eds.), Red, white, blue, and green: Politics and the environment in the 2004 election. New Haven, CT: Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies.Google Scholar
  38. Haass, R. (2018, October 7). Retrieved January 9, 2019, from
  39. Howell, K. (2010, February 5). Climate: Scientists call for interagency geoengineering research program. Environment and Energy Daily.Google Scholar
  40. Hulme, M. (2008). Geographical work at the boundaries of climate change. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 33(1), 5–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hulme, M. (2009). Why we disagree about climate change: Understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hulme, M. (2014). Can science fix climate change? A case against climate engineering. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  43. Huttunen, S., & Hilden, M. (2014). Framing the controversial: Geoengineering in academic literature. Science Communication, 36(1), 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (1995a). Second Assessment Climate Change 1995, synthesis report. Geneva: IPCC.Google Scholar
  45. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (1995c). Second Assessment Report, summary for policymakers. Geneva: IPCC.Google Scholar
  46. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2001). Climate Change 2001: Synthesis report. In R. T. Watson & The Core Writing Team (Eds.), A contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2007a). Climate Change 2007: Synthesis report. In R. K. Pachauri & A. Reisinger (Eds.), Contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: IPCC.Google Scholar
  48. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2007d). Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. In B. Metz, O. R. Davidson, P. R. Bosch, R. Dave, & L. A. Meyer (Eds.), Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2012). Meeting report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change expert meeting on geoengineering (O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, C. Field, V. Barros, T. F. Stocker, Q. Dahe, J. Minx, K. Mach, G.-K. Plattner, S. Schlömer, G. Hansen, & M. Mastrandrea, Eds.). IPCC Working Group III Technical Support Unit, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research. Geneva: IPCCGoogle Scholar
  50. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2013a). Climate Change 2013: The physical science basis. In Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2013b). Summary for policymakers. In T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, & P. M. Midgley (Eds.), Climate Change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  52. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2013d). Government and expert comments on draft Working Group 2 report, Chapter 19. Spreadsheet ‘WGIIAR5_SODCh19_annotation.pdf’ previously available from IPCC website. Download available from the author.Google Scholar
  53. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2013e). Expert review comments on draft Working Group 3 first order draft report. Spreadsheet available in pdf format from IPCC website as ‘Expert Review Comments on the IPCC WGIII AR5 First Order Draft—Chapter X.pdf’. Retrieved January 20, 2019, from
  54. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2014a). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis report. In Core Writing Team, R. K. Pachauri, & L. A. Meyer (Eds.), Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: IPCC.Google Scholar
  55. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2014c). Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. In Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Izrael, Y. A., Zakharov, V. M., Petrov, N. N., Ryaboshapko, A. G., Ivanov, V. N., Savchenko, A. V., et al. (2009). Field experiment on studying solar radiation passing through aerosol layers. Russian Meteorology and Hydrology, 34, 265–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Jackson, B. (2011, December 5). Gingrich on climate change. Retrieved January 9, 2019, from
  58. Keith, D. W. (2013). A case for climate engineering. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Keith, D. W. (2015). Climate engineering, no longer on the fringe. Interview 18 February. Available at Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences website. Retrieved January 9, 2019, from
  60. Keith, D. W., Parson, E., & Morgan, M. G. (2010). Research on global sun block needed now. Nature, 463, 426–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kemp, M. (2005). Science in culture: Inventing an icon. Nature, 437(7063), 1238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kiehl, J. T. (2006). Geoengineering climate change: Treating the symptom over the cause? Climatic Change, 77(3), 227–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kintisch, E. (2010). Hack the planet: Science’s best hope—Or worst nightmare—For averting climate catastrophe. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  64. Kirby, A. (2003, December 4). Russia’s climate tussle spins on. BBC News. Retrieved January 9, 2019, from
  65. Lane, L., & Bickel, J. E. (2013). Solar radiation management: An evolving climate policy option. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
  66. Lane, L., Caldeira, K., Chatfield, R., Langhoff, S. (2007). Workshop report on managing solar radiation. NASA Ames Research Centre & Carnegie Institute of Washington, Moffett Field, CA, 18–19 November. Hanover, MD: NASA. (NASA/CP-2007-214558).Google Scholar
  67. Lempert, R. J., & Prosnitz, D. (2011). Governing geoengineering research: A political and technical vulnerability analysis of potential near-term options. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
  68. Levitt, S. D., & Dubner, S. J. (2009). Superfreakonomics. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  69. Liverman, D. M. (2009). Conventions of climate change: Constructions of danger and the dispossession of the atmosphere. Journal of Historical Geography, 35, 279–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Lovelock, J. (2008). A geophysiologist’s thoughts on geoengineering. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 366(1882), 3883–3890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Lovelock, J. (2009). The vanishing face of Gaia: A final warning. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  72. MacMartin, D. G., Ricke, K. L., & Keith, D. W. (2018). Solar geoengineering as part of an overall strategy for meeting the 1.5°C Paris target. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 376, 20160454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Macnaghten, P., & Owen, R. (2011). Environmental science: Good governance for geoengineering. Nature, 479(7373), 291–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Macnaghten, P., & Szerszynski, B. (2013). Living the global social experiment: An analysis of public discourse on solar radiation management and its implications for governance. Global Environmental Change, 23, 465–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Markusson, N. (2013). Tensions in framings of geoengineering: Constitutive diversity and ambivalence. Climate Geoengineering Governance Working Paper Series: 003.Google Scholar
  76. Markusson, N., Ginn, F., Ghaleigh, N. S., & Scott, V. (2014). ‘In case of emergency press here’: Framing geoengineering as a response to dangerous climate change. WIREs Climate Change, 5(2), 281–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Moore, J. C., Chen, Y., Cui, X. F., Yuan, W. P., Dong, W. J., Gao, Y., et al. (2016). Will China be the first to initiate climate engineering? Earth’s Future, 4(12), 588–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Morton, O. (2007). Climate change: Is this what it takes to save the world? Nature, 447(7141), 132–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. National Research Council (NRC). (2003). Critical issues in weather modification research. Washington, DC: Committee on the Status and Future Directions in U.S Weather Modification Research and Operations, National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  80. National Research Council (NRC). (2015). Climate intervention: Reflecting sunlight to cool Earth. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  81. Nerlich, B., & Jaspal, R. (2012). Metaphors we die by? Geoengineering, metaphors, and the argument from catastrophe. Metaphor and Symbol, 27(2), 131–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Nordhaus, W. D. (1994). Managing the global commons: The economics of climate change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  83. Nurse, P. (2011, September 8). I hope we never need geoengineering, but we must research it. The Guardian. Retrieved January 9, 2019, from
  84. Oldham, P., Szerszynski, B., Stilgoe, J., Brown, C., Eacott, B., & Yuille, A. (2014). Mapping the landscape of climate engineering. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 372(2031), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Oreskes, N. (2004). Beyond the Ivory Tower: The scientific consensus on climate change. Science, 306(5702), 1686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Oschlies, A., & Klepper, G. (2017). Research for assessment, not deployment, of climate engineering: The German Research Foundation’s Priority Program SPP 1689. Earth’s Future, 5(1), 128–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Pierrehumbert, R. (2015, February 10). Climate hacking is barking mad. Slate. Retrieved January 9, 2019, from
  88. Porter, K. E., & Hulme, M. (2013). The emergence of the geoengineering debate in the UK print media: A frame analysis. The Geographical Journal, 179(4), 342–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Ricke, K., Morgan, M. G., Apt, J., Victor, D., & Steinbruner, J. (2008). Unilateral geoengineering: Non-technical briefing notes for a workshop at the Council on Foreign Relations, Washington, DC, May 5, 2008. Retrieved January 9, 2019, from
  90. Rickels, W., Klepper, G., Dovern, J., Betz, G., Brachatzek, N., Cacean, S., et al. (2011). Large-scale intentional interventions into the climate system? Assessing the climate engineering debate. Scoping report conducted on behalf of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Kiel Earth Institute.Google Scholar
  91. Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Robine, J.-M., Cheung, S. L., Le Roy, S., Van Oyen, H., Griffiths, C., Michel, J. P., et al. (2008). Death toll exceeded 70,000 in Europe during the summer of 2003. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 331(2), 171–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Robock, A. (2008). 20 reasons why geoengineering may be a bad idea. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 64(2), 14–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Robock, A. (2014, May 5). A case against climate engineering. Huffington Post. Retrieved January 9, 2019, from
  95. Robock, A., Marquardt, A. B., Kravitz, B., & Stenchikov, G. (2009). Benefits, risks, and costs of stratospheric geoengineering. Geophysical Research Letters, 36(19), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Royal Society. (2009). Geoengineering the climate: Science, governance and uncertainty. RS Policy document 10/09. London: Royal Society. Retrieved January 9, 2019, from
  97. Schelling, T. C. (1996). The economic diplomacy of geoengineering. Climatic Change, 33(3), 303–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Schiermeier, Q. (2003). Climate change: The long road from Kyoto. Nature, 426(6968), 756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Schmidt, G. (2006, June 28). Geo-engineering in vogue. RealClimate. Retrieved January 9, 2019, from
  100. Schnare, D. W. (2007). A framework to prevent the catastrophic effects of global warming using solar radiation management (geo-engineering). Supplement to Testimony before the United States Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works.Google Scholar
  101. Schneider, S. (2001). Earth systems engineering and management. Nature, 409(6818), 417–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Schrickel, I. (2014). Images of feasibility: On the viscourse of climate engineering. In B. Schneider & T. Nocke (Eds.), Image politics of climate change: Visualizations, imaginations, documentations. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
  103. Schwartz, P., & Randall, D. (2003). An abrupt climate change scenario and its implications for United States national security. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Defense. Retrieved from or
  104. Shaw, C., & Nerlich, B. (2015). Metaphor as a mechanism of global climate change governance: A study of international policies, 1992–2012. Ecological Economics, 109, 34–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Sikka, T. (2012). A critical discourse analysis of geoengineering advocacy. Critical Discourse Studies, 9, 163–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Singer, P. (2002). One World: The ethics of globalization. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  107. Sinitsyna, T. (2008, June 25). Ways to tame the climate. Opinion piece in Sputnik News. Retrieved January 9, 2019, from
  108. Stilgoe, J. (2015). Experiment Earth: Responsible innovation in geoengineering. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Teller, E. (1997, October 17). Sunscreen for planet earth. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved January 9, 2019, from
  110. Teller, E., Hyde, R., & Wood, L. (2002). Active climate stabilization: Practical physics-based approaches to prevention of climate change. National Academy of Engineering Symposium, Washington, DC, April 23–24. Preprint UCRL-JC-148012.Google Scholar
  111. Tyndall Centre Cambridge-MIT Institute Symposium. (2004). Macro-engineering options for climate change management and mitigation.Google Scholar
  112. UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change). (2015). Adoption of the Paris agreement. FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1. Conference of the Parties, Paris, December 12.Google Scholar
  113. US House of Representatives Committee on Science and Technology (USHCST). (2009). Hearing: Geoengineering: Parts I, II and III, assessing the implications of large scale climate intervention (pp. 111–162, 111–175, and 111–188). Washington, DC: US House of Representatives. Retrieved January 20, 2019, from
  114. US House of Representatives Committee on Science and Technology (USHCST). (2010). Engineering the climate: Research needs and strategies for international coordination. Report by Bart Gordon. Retrieved January 20, 2019, from
  115. Van Hemert, M. (2017). Speculative promise as a driver in climate engineering research: The case of Paul Crutzen’s back-of-the-envelope calculation on solar dimming with sulfate aerosols. Futures, 92, 80–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Victor, D. G. (2011). Global warming gridlock: Creating more effective strategies for protecting the planet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Wagner, G., & Weitzman, M. L. (2015). Climate shock. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. White House. (2001). President Bush discusses global climate change. Press Release, June 11. Retrieved January 9, 2019, from
  119. Wigley, T. M. L. (2006). A combined mitigation/geoengineering approach to climate stabilization. Science, 314, 452–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Melbourne School of GovernmentUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations