• Jeremy BaskinEmail author


Can global warming be reversed or kept within ‘safe’ limits? Since at least the late 1980s the standard answer is that it can be … but only if greenhouse gas emissions are cut significantly, and soon. This approach informed the Kyoto treaty. And it is now enshrined in the Paris climate agreement. In reality though, climate action to date has been underwhelming. National emissions targets are insufficiently ambitious. The United States (and now Brazil) are no longer committed to the Paris agreement and its goals. Average global surface temperatures are currently about 1°C above pre-industrial levels and rising. So are greenhouse gas emissions. In the face of this gloomy outlook there is a different kind of solution circulating in climate policymaking circles, but still largely out of public view, that it is the earth, not human behaviour which should be modified. Specifically, the argument is being put forth by some that a cooler climate could be engineered. This Chapter introduces the book as a whole. It outlines the basic idea of solar geoengineering (SGE). It argues that, as a highly controversial and not-yet-deployed technology, how SGE is imagined will shape (or prevent) its emergence. The focus of the book is to conduct a sociotechnical rather than a technoscientific analysis of SGE. It makes the argument for focusing on competing imaginaries of SGE and for looking at the assumptions about power relations, about what knowledge counts, and about which values matter which pervade the many ‘official’ assessments of SGE and the work of key knowledge-brokers.


  1. Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Bijker, W., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. (Eds.). (1987). The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bipartisan Policy Center (BPC). (2011). Geoengineering: A national strategic plan for research on the potential effectiveness, feasibility, and consequences of climate remediation technologies. Washington, DC: Bipartisan Policy Center Task Force on Climate Remediation Research.Google Scholar
  4. Blackstock, J., Miller, C., & Rayner, S. (Eds.). (2015). Geoengineering our climate? Ethics, politics and governance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Brand, S. (2009). Whole earth discipline: An ecopragmatist manifesto. London: Viking.Google Scholar
  6. Buck, H. J. (2018). Perspectives on solar geoengineering from Finnish Lapland: Local insights on the global imaginary of Arctic geoengineering. Geoforum, 91, 78–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). (2008). See Ricke et al. 2008.Google Scholar
  8. Crutzen, P. J. (2006). Albedo enhancement by stratospheric sulfur injections: A contribution to resolve a policy dilemma? Climatic Change, 77(3–4), 211–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ecomodernist Manifesto. (2015). Retrieved January 9, 2019, from
  10. ETC Group. (2010, November). Geopiracy: The case against geoengineering (2nd ed.). Retrieved January 9, 2019, from
  11. ETC Group/Biofuelwatch. (2017). The big bad fix: The case against climate geoengineering. Retrieved January 9, 2019, from
  12. Fleming, J. R. (2010). Fixing the sky: The checkered history of weather and climate control. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  13. GAO (Government Accountability Office). (2011). Climate engineering: Technical status, future directions, and potential responses. GAO-11-71. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accountability Office. Retrieved January 9, 2019, from
  14. Gardiner, S. (2011). A perfect moral storm: The ethical tragedy of climate change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ginzky, H., Herrmann, F., Kartschall, K., Leujak, W., Lipsius, K., Mäder, C., et al. (2011). Geoengineering: Effective climate protection or megalomania? Dessau-Roßlau: Umweltbundesamt.Google Scholar
  16. Goodell, J. (2010). How to cool the planet: Geoengineering and the audacious quest to fix Earth’s climate. Melbourne: Scribe.Google Scholar
  17. Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46, 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamilton, C. (2013). Earthmasters: Playing god with the climate. Crow’s Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  19. Harrison, R. M., & Hester, R. E. (Eds.). (2014). Geoengineering of the climate system. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.Google Scholar
  20. Hulme, M. (2014). Can science fix climate change? A case against climate engineering. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  21. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2012). Meeting report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change expert meeting on geoengineering (O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, C. Field, V. Barros, T. F. Stocker, Q. Dahe, J. Minx, K. Mach, G.-K. Plattner, S. Schlömer, G. Hansen, & M. Mastrandrea, Eds.). IPCC Working Group III Technical Support Unit, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research. Geneva: IPCC.Google Scholar
  22. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2013). Summary for policymakers. In T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, & P. M. Midgley (Eds.), Climate Change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Irvine, P. J., Kravitz, B., Lawrence, M. G., & Muri, H. (2016). An overview of the Earth system science of solar geoengineering. WIREs Climate Change, 7(6), 815–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jasanoff, S. (1990). The fifth branch: Science advisers as policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Jasanoff, S. (2004). The idiom of co-production. In S. Jasanoff (Ed.), States of knowledge: The co-production of science and social order. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jasanoff, S. (2015). Future imperfect: Science, technology and the imaginations of modernity. In S. Jasanoff & S.-H. Kim (Eds.), Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power (pp. 1–33). Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (2009). Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva, 47(2), 119–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Keith, D. W. (2013). A case for climate engineering. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kintisch, E. (2010). Hack the planet: Science’s best hope—Or worst nightmare—For averting climate catastrophe. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  30. Lane, L., Caldeira, K., Chatfield, R., & Langhoff, S. (2007). Workshop report on managing solar radiation. NASA Ames Research Centre & Carnegie Institute of Washington, Moffett Field, CA, 18–19 November. Hanover, MD: NASA. (NASA/CP-2007-214558) Retrieved from
  31. Launder, B., & Thompson, J. M. T. (Eds.). (2010). Geo-engineering climate change: Environmental necessity or Pandora’s box? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lempert, R. J., & Prosnitz, D. (2011). Governing geoengineering research: A political and technical vulnerability analysis of potential near-term options. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
  33. Liao, S. M., Sandberg, A., & Roache, R. (2012). Human engineering and climate change. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 15(2), 206–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Long, J. C. S., & Scott, D. (2013). Vested interests and geoengineering research. Issues in Science and Technology, 29(3), 45–52.Google Scholar
  35. Möller, I. (n.d.). The geoengineering knowledge network: Explaining norm convergence on geoengineering in global climate politics. Unpublished paper supplied by author.Google Scholar
  36. Morton, O. (2015). The planet remade: How geoengineering could change the world. London: Granta.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. NASA. 2007. See Lane et al. 2007.Google Scholar
  38. National Research Council (NRC). (2015). Climate intervention: Reflecting sunlight to cool Earth. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  39. Oldham, P., Szerszynski, B., Stilgoe, J., Brown, C., Eacott, B., & Yuille, A. (2014). Mapping the landscape of climate engineering. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 372(2031), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pierrehumbert, R. (2015, February 10). Climate hacking is barking mad. Slate. Retrieved January 9, 2019, from
  41. Preston, C. (Ed.). (2016). Climate justice and geoengineering ethics and policy in the atmospheric Anthropocene. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  42. RAND Corporation. (2011). See Lempert & Prosnitz 2011.Google Scholar
  43. Reynolds, J. L., Parker, A., & Irvine, P. (2016). Five solar geoengineering tropes that have outstayed their welcome. Earth’s Future, 4(12), 562–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ricke, K., Morgan, M. G., Apt, J., Victor, D., & Steinbruner, J. (2008, May 5). Unilateral geoengineering: Non-technical briefing notes for a workshop at the Council on Foreign Relations. Washington, DC. Retrieved January 9, 2019, from
  45. Rickels, W., Klepper, G., Dovern, J., Betz, G., Brachatzek, N., Cacean, S., et al. (2011). Large-scale intentional interventions into the climate system? Assessing the climate engineering debate. Scoping report conducted on behalf of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Kiel Earth Institute.Google Scholar
  46. Robock, A. (2008). 20 reasons why geoengineering may be a bad idea. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 64(2), 14–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Royal Society. (2009). Geoengineering the climate: Science, governance and uncertainty. RS Policy document 10/09. London: Royal Society. Retrieved January 9, 2019, from
  48. Schäfer, S., Lawrence, M., Stelzer, H., Born, W., & Low, S. (2015). Removing greenhouse gases from the atmosphere and reflecting sunlight away from Earth. Final report of the FP7 CSA project EuTRACE (European Transdisciplinary Assessment of Climate Engineering). Potsdam: Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies.Google Scholar
  49. Schäfer, S., & Low, S. (2014). Asilomar moments: Formative framings in recombinant DNA and solar climate engineering research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 372(2031), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schneider, S. (2001). Earth systems engineering and management. Nature, 409(6818), 417–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Steger, M. B. (2009). Globalisms: The great ideological struggle of the twenty-first century (3rd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  52. Stilgoe, J. (2015). Experiment Earth: Responsible innovation in geoengineering. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stone, D. (2002). Introduction: Global knowledge and advocacy networks. Global Networks, 2(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Swyngedouw, E. (2011). Depoliticized environments: The end of nature, climate change and the post-political condition. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 69, 253–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Szerszynski, B., & Galarraga, M. (2013). Geoengineering knowledge: Interdisciplinarity and the shaping of climate engineering research. Environment and Planning A, 45(12), 2817–2824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Taylor, C. (2002). Modern social imaginaries. Public Culture, 14(1), 91–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Victor, D. G. (2011). Global warming gridlock: Creating more effective strategies for protecting the planet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wagner, G., & Weitzman, M. L. (2012, October 24). Playing God. Foreign Policy. Retrieved January 9, 2019, from
  59. Wood, G. D. (2014). Tambora: The eruption that changed the world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Xu, Y., Ramanathan, V., & Victor, D. G. (2018). Global warming will happen faster than we think. Nature, 564, 30–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Melbourne School of GovernmentUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations