A Lazy User Perspective to Patient Adoption and Use of Personal Health Records
Personal health records (PHRs) are seen as the bedrock of patient engagement. They have the potential to improve health outcomes for individual healthcare consumers, providers, and the broader healthcare system. With Meaningful Use Stage 2 now mandating the implementation of tethered PHRs (as patient portals), will healthcare consumers actually use PHRs and realize the contributions to patient safety, quality care, efficiencies, and reduced health disparities through engagement? Or will PHR actual use remain low? In this interpretive qualitative study, using grounded theory, we asked healthcare consumers users they currently manage their personal health information (PHI) and why. Evidence from our study iterates to the lazy user theory, we found that letting physicians manage healthcare consumers PHI is the least effort-based solution and thus the predominant and preferred solution by healthcare consumers. Providers as guardians of patient PHI suggest that the low use rates may yet persist. The implicit equating of personal health information as provider-generated health information by both healthcare consumers and the designers of PHR tools they use blurs the value proposition for consumers.
KeywordsPatient engagement Personal health records Patient portal
- Abramson, E. L., Patel, V., Edwards, A., & Kaushal, R. (2014). Consumer perspectives on personal health records: A 4-community study. American Journal of Managed Care, 20, 287–a298.Google Scholar
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2017). About the national quality strategy. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. https://www.ahrq.gov/workingforquality/about/index.html. Accessed 22 Sept 2018.
- Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- Association, A. H. (2018). Expanding electronic patient engagement. Annual Survey, IT Supplement Brief March.Google Scholar
- Borfitz, D. (2018). Blockchain-secured, patient-controlled health records. https://www.clinicalinformaticsnews.com/2018/05/08/real-world-blockchain-applications-in- healthcare.aspx.
- Carrión, I., Alemán, J. L. F., & Toval, A. (2011). Assessing the HIPAA standard in practice: PHR privacy policies. In: Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE, 2011. IEEE, pp 2380–2383.Google Scholar
- Collan, M., & Tétard, F. (2011). Lazy user model: Solution selection and discussion about switching costs. In Scandinavian conference on information systems (pp. 56–68). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
- Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 12, 319–340.Google Scholar
- Department of Health and Human Services CfMaMS. (2010). 42 CFR parts 412, 413, 422 et al. Medicare and medicaid programs: Electronic health record incentive program; Final Rule.Google Scholar
- Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 7, 213–236.Google Scholar
- Jones, D. A., Shipman, J. P., Plaut, D. A., & Selden, C. R. (2010). Characteristics of personal health records: Findings of the medical library association/national library of medicine joint electronic personal health record task force. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 98, 243.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kunene, K. N., Zysk, K., & Diop, M. -F. (2016). Healthcare consumers’ voluntary adoption and non- adoption of electronic personal health records. In: The 27th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Wollongong, NSW, Australia, 2016. University of Wollongong, Faculty of Business.Google Scholar
- Lester, M., Boateng, S., Studeny, J., & Coustasse, A. (2016). Personal health records: Beneficial or burdensome for patients and healthcare providers? Perspectives in Health Information Management, 13, 115–118.Google Scholar
- Mitchell, B., & Begoray, D. (2010). Electronic personal health records that promote self-management in chronic illness. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 15, 1B–10B.Google Scholar
- Patel, V., & Johnson, C. (2018). Individuals’ use of online medical records and technology for health needs (Vol. 40). Washington, DC: Office of the National Coordinator.Google Scholar
- Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Saparova, D. (2012). Motivating, influencing, and persuading patients through personal health records: A scoping review. Perspectives in Health Information Management, 1 243–249.Google Scholar
- Services CfMaM. (2018). Promoting interoperability. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/index.html?redirect=/EHRIncentivePrograms. Accessed 22 Sept 2018.
- Spil, T., & Klein, R. (2014). Personal health records success: why Google health failed and what does that mean for Microsoft HealthVault? In: 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 2014. IEEE, pp 2818–2827.Google Scholar
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research (Vol. 15). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. Handbook of Qualitative Research, 17, 273–285.Google Scholar
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Second edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Studeney and Coustasse with https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4832132/.
- Tétard, F., & Collan, M. (2009). Lazy user theory: A dynamic model to understand user selection of products and services. In: System Sciences, 2009. HICSS’09. 42nd Hawaii International Conference on, 2009. IEEE, pp 1–9.Google Scholar
- Van Maanen, J. (1983). Reclaiming qualitative methods for organizational research: A preface. In J. Van Maanen (Ed.), Qualitative methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
- Vance, B., Tomblin, B., Studeny, J., & Coustasse, A. (2014). Personal health records: Benefits and barriers for its adoption. Insights to a Changing World Journal, 2014, 48–67.Google Scholar
- Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 12, 425–478.Google Scholar
- Vydra, T. P., Cuaresma, E., Kretovics, M., & Bose-Brill, S. (2015). Diffusion and use of tethered personal health records in primary care. Perspectives in Health Information Management, 12, 109–114.Google Scholar
- Zipf, G. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar