Advertisement

Addressing Data Accuracy and Information Integrity in mHealth Solutions Using Machine Learning Algorithms

  • Zaid Sako
  • Sasan Adibi
  • Nilmini Wickramasinghe
Chapter
Part of the Healthcare Delivery in the Information Age book series (Healthcare Delivery Inform. Age)

Abstract

Today, much of the healthcare delivery is done digitally. In particular, there exists a plethora of mHealth solutions being developed. This in turn necessitates the need for accurate data and information integrity if superior mHealth is to ensue. Lack of data accuracy and information integrity can cause serious harm to patients and limit the benefits of mHealth technology. The described exploratory case study serves to investigate data accuracy and information integrity in mHealth, with the aim of incorporating Machine Learning to detect sources of inaccurate data and deliver quality information. The outcome of the study was a successful testing of a Machine Learning algorithm (Decision Tree) for mHealth data that consisted of secondary diabetes data. The algorithm was able to classify the data as accurate or inaccurate.

Keywords

Data quality Data accuracy Information integrity Machine learning Diabetes 

References

  1. Armstrong, B. K., Gillespie, J. A., Leeder, S. R., Rubin, G. L., & Russell, L. M. (2007). Challenges in health and health care for Australia. Medical Journal of Australia, 187(9), 485–489.Google Scholar
  2. Bell, J. (2014). Machine learning: Hands-on for developers and technical professionals. New York: Wiley, ISBN: 978-1-118-88906-0. 408 Pages.Google Scholar
  3. Boulos, M. N. K., Wheeler, S., Tavares, C., & Jones, R. (2011). How smartphones are changing the face of mobile and participatory healthcare: An overview, with example from eCAALYX. Biomedical Engineering Online, 10, 24–24.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-10-24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Bovell-Benjamin, A. (2016). Chronic diseases: The escalating dilemma in developing countries. New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  5. Bowman, S. (2013). Impact of electronic health record systems on information integrity: Quality and safety implications. Perspectives in Health Information Management, 1–19. 19p.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, M. Z., Steeves, R. H., & Kahn, D. L. (2000). Hermeneutic phenomenological research: A practical guide for nurse researchers. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  7. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed., p. c2009). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Cucoranu, I. C., Parwani, A. V., West, A. J., Romero-Lauro, G., Nauman, K., Carter, A. B., et al. (2013). Privacy and security of patient data in the pathology laboratory. Journal of Pathology Informatics, 4(1), 23–39.  https://doi.org/10.4103/2153-3539.108542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cunningham, P. (2012). It’s most important role: Ensuring information integrity. Information Management Journal., 3, 20.Google Scholar
  10. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., p. c2011). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Donley, A. M. (2012). Research methods. New York: Infobase Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. Dumas, M. B. (2013). Diving into the bitstream: Information technology meets society in a Digital World. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Eisele, T. P., Silumbe, K., Yukich, J., Hamainza, B., Keating, J., Bennett, A., & Miller, J. M. (2013). Measuring coverage in MNCH: Accuracy of measuring diagnosis and treatment of childhood malaria from household surveys in Zambia. PLoS Medicine, 10(5), e1001417.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001417.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Fadlalla, A., & Wickramasinghe, N. (2004). An integrative framework for HIPAA-compliant I∗IQ healthcare information systems. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance Incorporating Leadership in Health Services, 17(2–3), 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Flick, U., Kardorff, E. v., & Steinke, I. (2004). A companion to qualitative research. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  16. Flocke, S. A., & Stange, K. C. (2004). Direct observation and patient recall of health behavior advice. Preventive Medicine, 38(3), 343–349.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.11.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Flowerday, S., & Solms, R. V. (2010). What constitutes information integrity? South African Journal of Information Management, 2, 1–9.Google Scholar
  18. Fox, S., & Duggan, M. (2012). Mobile health 2012. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.Google Scholar
  19. Garvin, J. H., Martin, K. S., Stassen, D. L., & Bowles, K. H. (2008). The Omaha system. Journal of AHIMA, 79(3), 44–49.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gideon, L. (2012). Handbook of survey methodology for the social sciences. New York: Springer New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Greene, E., Proctor, P., & Kotz, D. (2018). Secure sharing of mHealth data streams through cryptographically-enforced access control. Smart Health.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smhl.2018.01.003.
  22. Hamel, M. B., Cortez, N. G., Cohen, I. G., & Kesselheim, A. S. (2014). FDA regulation of mobile health technologies. The New England Journal of Medicine, 371(4), 372–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Health informatics: Improving patient care. (2012). Swindon: British Informatics Society Ltd.Google Scholar
  24. Holzinger, A. (2016). Interactive machine learning for health informatics: When do we need the human-in-the-loop? Brain Inform, 3(2), 119–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. International Telecommunication Union. (2015). Key ICT indicators for developed and developing countries and the world (totals and penetration rates). Retrieved February 2016, from http://www.itu.int/en/ITUD/Statistics/Documents/statistics/2015/ITU_Key_2005-2015_ICT_data.xls
  26. Jenicek, M. (2010). Medical error and harm understanding, prevention, and control. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jugulum, R., & Gray, D. H. (2014). Competing with high quality data: Concepts, tools, and techniques for building a successful approach to data quality. Somerset: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kahn, J. G., Yang, J. S., & Kahn, J. S. (2010). ‘Mobile’ health needs and opportunities in developing countries. Health Affairs, 29(2), 252–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Klonoff, D. C. (2013). The current status of mHealth for diabetes: Will it be the next big thing? Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 7(3), 749–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kumar, S., Nilsen, W. J., Abernethy, A., Atienza, A., Patrick, K., Pavel, M., et al. (2013). Mobile health technology evaluation: The mhealth evidence workshop. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 45(2), 228–236.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2013.03.017.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Lambin, P., Roelofs, E., Reymen, B., Velazquez, E. R., Buijsen, J., Zegers, C. M., et al. (2013). ‘Rapid learning health care in oncology’ – An approach towards decision support systems enabling customised radiotherapy. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 109(1), 159–164.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2013.07.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lin, J. Y. (2013). Mobile health tracking of sleep bruxism for clinical, research, and personal reflection. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5wr4q4xn
  33. Linda, L. K. (2012). Information integrity: A high risk, high cost vulnerability proper information governance includes paying attention to some key building blocks.(GOVERNANCE). Health Data Management, 20(4), 44.Google Scholar
  34. Mahmood, N., Burney, A., Abbas, Z., & Rizwan, K. (2012). Data and knowledge management in designing healthcare information systems. Growth, 9(10), 11.Google Scholar
  35. Marconi, K., & Lehmann, H. (2014). Big data and health analytics. Philadelphia: Auerbach Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McGraw, D. (2012). Building public trust in uses of health insurance portability and accountability act de-identified data. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA, 20(1), 29.  https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000936.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Mena, L. J., Felix, V. G., Ostos, R., Gonzalez, J. A., Cervantes, A., Ochoa, A., et al. (2013). Mobile personal health system for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2013, 13.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/598196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mohammed, M., Khan, M. B., & Bashier, E. B. M. (2016). Machine learning: Algorithms and applications. Milton: Chapman and Hall/CRC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Monsen, K. A., Martin, K. S., Christensen, J. R., & Westra, B. L. (2009). Omaha system data: Methods for research and program evaluation. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 146, 783–784.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Mottl, J. (2014) The imperative of safety in mHealth and why it can’t be ignored. http://www.fiercemobilehealthcare.com/story/imperative-safety-mhealth-and-why-itcant-be-ignored/2014-05-26.
  41. Murthy, R., & Kotz, D. (2014). Assessing blood-pressure measurement in tablet-based mHealth apps. Paper presented at the COMSNETS.Google Scholar
  42. Närman, P., Holm, H., Johnson, P., König, J., Chenine, M., & Ekstedt, M. (2011). Data accuracy assessment using enterprise architecture. Enterprise Information Systems, 5(1), 37–58.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2010.507878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Oachs, P. K., Eichenwald, S., LaTour, K. M., & American Health Information Management. (2010). Health information management: Concepts, principles, and practice (4th ed.). Chicago: AHIMA Press.Google Scholar
  44. Olson, J. E. (2003). Chapter 3 – Sources of inaccurate data. In J. E. Olson (Ed.), Data quality (pp. 43–64). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Patnaik, S., Brunskill, E., & Thies, W. (2009). Evaluating the accuracy of data collection on mobile phones: A study of forms, SMS, and voice. Paper presented at the Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD), 2009 international conference on.Google Scholar
  46. Sadiq, S. E. (2013). Handbook of data quality research and practice. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sannino, G., De Falco, I., & De Pietro, G. (2014). A general-purpose mHealth system relying on knowledge acquisition through artificial intelligence ambient intelligence-software and applications (pp. 107–115). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  48. Sayles, N. B., & American Health Information Management. (2013). Health information management technology: An applied approach (4th ed.). Chicago: AHIMA Press.Google Scholar
  49. Taylor, A. (n.d.). 1.1.4.1 Threat. A potential cause of an incident that may result in harm to a system or organisation (ISO 27002) information security management principles (2nd ed.). BCS The Chartered Institute for IT. https://www.saiglobal.com/PDFTemp/Previews/OSH/AS/AS20000/27000/27002-2006(+A1).pdf
  50. The Omaha system. (2018). http://www.omahasystem.org/overview.html
  51. Topaz, M., Golfenshtein, N., & Bowles, K. H. (2014). The Omaha system: A systematic review of the recent literature. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 21(1), 163–170. 168p.  https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001491.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Van Den Bos, J., Rustagi, K., Gray, T., Halford, M., Ziemkiewicz, E., & Shreve, J. (2011). The $17.1 billion problem: The annual cost of measurable medical errors. Health Affairs, 30(4), 596–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. van Velthoven, M. H., Car, J., Zhang, Y., & Marušić, A. (2013). mHealth series: New ideas for mHealth data collection implementation in low– And middle–income countries. Journal of Global Health, 3(2), 020101.  https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.03.020101.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Varshney, U. (2009). Pervasive healthcare computing. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vincent, C. (2010). Patient safety (2nd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wang, R. Y. (1996). Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4), 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. World Health Organization, Mendis, S. (2014). QR code for global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2014. In: S. Mendis. Global Status Report on Noncommunicable Diseases 2014. World Health Organization, p. 280.Google Scholar
  58. World Health Organization. (2018a). Data quality review. Retrieved 20 July 2018. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/259224/9789241512725-eng.pdf?sequence=1
  59. World Health Organization. (2018b).Global status report on noncommunicable diseases. Retrieved 27 Apr 2018. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/148114/1/9789241564854_eng.pdf?ua=1
  60. World Health Organization. (2018c). Noncommunicable diseases. Retrieved 22 July 2018. http://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases
  61. World Health Organization. (2018d). Time to deliver. Retrieved 16 July 2018. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/272710/9789241514163-eng.pdf?ua=1
  62. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zaid Sako
    • 1
  • Sasan Adibi
    • 2
  • Nilmini Wickramasinghe
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Deakin UniversityKew EastAustralia
  2. 2.School of Information Technology, Deakin UniversityEast KewAustralia
  3. 3.Epworth HealthCareRichmondAustralia
  4. 4.Swinburne University of TechnologyHawthornAustralia

Personalised recommendations