Advertisement

Supporting and Understanding Reflection on Persuasive Technology Through a Reflection Schema

  • Fahri YetimEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11433)

Abstract

Literature on persuasive technology acknowledges the importance of promoting reflection within design research and practice. This paper takes up a reflection framework suggested in previous research as assisting the reasoning of researchers, designers or other stakeholders concerning values, goals, actions, and their consequences in a project. It contributes to this research by demonstrating additional evidence for the applicability of the reflection framework by applying it to a published case. This work can guide researchers and practitioners by means of issues to be considered while reflecting on as well as communicating value-related aspects in a project, so that significant value choices and the rationale for actions taken to promote them are clear.

Keywords

Reflection Discourse ethics Value sensitive design Research communication Persuasive technology 

References

  1. 1.
    Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., McBurney, P.: Computational representation of practical argument. Synthese 152(2), 157–206 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davis, J., Nathan, L.P.: Value sensitive design: applications, adaptations, and critiques. In: van de Poel, I., Vermaas, P., van den Hoven, J. (eds.) Handbook of Ethics, Values and Technological Design, pp. 11–40. Springer, Dordrecht (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6970-0_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Friedman, B., Kahn Jr., P.H., Borning, A.: Value sensitive design and information systems. In: Zhang, P., Galletta, D. (eds.), Human-Computer Interaction in Management Information Systems: Foundations, pp. 348–372. New York (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Habermas, J.: Justification and Application. Polity Press, Cambridge (1993)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Habermas, J.: Between Facts and Norms. Polity Press, Cambridge (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Haghighatkhah, A., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Yetim, F.: An argumentation-based design rationale application for reflective practice. In: Proceedings of the 22nd European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), 9–11 June 2014, Tel Aviv, Israel (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Halttu, K., Oinas-Kukkonen, H.: Persuading to reflect: role of reflection and insight in persuasive systems design for physical activity. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 32(5–6), 381–412 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Klein, H.K., Myers, M.D.: A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Q. 23, 67–94 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kuonanoja, L., Meedya, S., Win, K., Oinas-Kukkonen, H.: Ethical evaluation of a value sensitive persuasive system: case milky way. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, pp. 1983–2825 (2018)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Harjumaa, M.: Persuasive systems design: key issues, process model, and system features. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 24, 485–500 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ploderer, B., Reitberger, W., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., van Gemert-Pijnen, J.: Social interaction and reflection for behaviour change. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 18(2), 1667–1676 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Purpura, S., Schwanda, V., Williams, K., Stubler, W., Sengers, P.: Fit4Life: the design of a persuasive technology promoting healthy behavior and ideal weight. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA, pp. 423–432. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yetim, F.: Acting with genres: discursive-ethical concepts for reflecting on and legitimating genres. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 15(1), 54–69 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yetim, F.: Critical examination of information: a discursive approach and its implementations. Informing Sci. 11, 125–146 (2008). http://inform.nu/Articles/Vol11/ISJv11p125-146Yetim212.pdf
  15. 15.
    Yetim, F.: A set of critical heuristics for value sensitive designers and users of persuasive systems. In: Proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2011), 9–11 June 2011, Helsinki, Finland (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yetim, F.: Bringing discourse ethics to value sensitive design: pathways to toward a deliberative future. AIS Trans. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3(2), 133–155 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yetim, F.: Critical perspective on persuasive technology reconsidered. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI-2013), 27 April–02 May 2013, Paris, pp. 3327–3330. ACM, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yetim, F.: Applicability of a reflection model for communicating value sensitive design research. In: Proceedings of the 24th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), 12–15 June 2016, Istanbul, Turkey (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information SystemsFOM University of Applied SciencesCologneGermany
  2. 2.Department of Information Processing ScienceUniversity of OuluOuluFinland

Personalised recommendations