A Group Intervention to Improve Physical Activity at the Workplace
We present an exploratory field study to investigate the acceptability of a group intervention to promote physical activity. To this end, a five-week group coaching program was developed, as well as the technological infrastructure to deliver this program. People participated in teams, consisting of hospital staff working together in a ward or department. Two teams of nurses and one team of facility support staff participated in the study. The program contained two consecutive team challenges; aimed at increasing daily step count and daily stairs taken. Participants wore a FitBit One activity tracker to measure steps and stairs. Personal information was delivered via a smart phone app, while aggregated team information was shown on a large screen placed in a common room at the ward. At the end of the study, group interviews were held to elicit feedback on the acceptability of the concept and experience of the coaching program. Participants were enthusiastic about the concept. They indicated that the group coaching caused bonding and improved team cohesion. There was a clear need to communicate within the team (now solved through WhatsApp groups). Furthermore, they would have liked an element of competition between teams. Overall, the results were positive, leading to the conclusion that team coaching at the workplace is a promising strategy to promote physical activity.
KeywordsGroup coaching Physical activity Workplace intervention Digital intervention Field study Qualitative research
This study was executed in the context of the EIT Digital project ProVITA (Prolonging Vitality and Wellness at the Workplace). We thank Ernst Hermens for managing this project. Furthermore, we thank Rik Bootsman, Frank Stokes, Hwang Kim, Abdul Nabi, Stijn Kooij, Jelte Bijkerk, Roberto Gamboni, Harijs Deksnis and Sandeep Kumar Pamujula for their contribution to the visual design and development of the Active Team app and Active Team screen. Finally, we thank the management and staff of the Royal Free Hospital London for enabling us to execute the study there.
- 1.American Time Use Survey (ATUS): Bureau of Labor Statistics. https://www.bls.gov/tus/charts.htm. Accessed 13 Nov 2018
- 2.Fitbit One. https://www.fitbit.com/eu/one. Accessed 22 Nov 2018
- 10.Frederick-Recascino, C., Schuster-Smith, H.: Competition and intrinsic motivation in physical activity: a comparison of two groups. J. Sport Behav. 26, 240–254 (2003)Google Scholar
- 12.Joubert, Y., de Beer, H.: Experiences of employees who participate in organisational team sport activities. J. Emerg. Trends Econ. Manag. Sci. 1(1), 51–59 (2010)Google Scholar
- 16.Mollee, J., Klein, M.: The effectiveness of upward and downward social comparison of physical activity in an online intervention. In: 15th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing and Communications and 2016 International Symposium on Cyberspace and Security (IUCC-CSS), pp. 109–115, December 2016Google Scholar
- 19.Shameli, A., Althoff, T., Saberi, A., Leskovec, J.: How gamification affects physical activity: large-scale analysis of walking challenges in a mobile application. In: Proceedings of the International World-Wide Web Conference, pp. 455–463 (2017)Google Scholar
- 20.Simms, A., Nichols, T.: Social loafing: a review of the literature. J. Manag. Policy Pract. 15(1), 58–67 (2014)Google Scholar
- 21.Skillman, S., Palazzo, L., Hart, L., Keepnews, D.: The characteristics of registered nurses whose licenses expire: why they leave nursing and implications for retention and re-entry. Nurs. Econ. 28(3), 181–189 (2010)Google Scholar
- 22.Steverman, B.: More senior citizens working past retirement age (2017). https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2017/07/11/457194.htm. Accessed 13 Nov 2018
- 23.World Health Organization: Global recommendations on physical activity for health (2010). https://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/publications/9789241599979/en/. Accessed 20 Nov 2018