Advertisement

Actual Persuasiveness: Impact of Personality, Age and Gender on Message Type Susceptibility

  • Ana CiocarlanEmail author
  • Judith Masthoff
  • Nir Oren
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11433)

Abstract

Persuasive technologies use a variety of strategies and principles to encourage people to adopt and maintain beneficial behaviours and attitudes. In this paper we investigate the influence of Cialdini’s seven persuasive principles on people’s choices, actions and behaviour. In contrast to related work investigating perceived persusaion, this study analyses actual persuasion. We also investigate the impact of personality, age and gender on people’s susceptibility to different message types. Furthermore, we investigate if people’s susceptibility to different persuasive messages is consistent over time. The findings suggest that certain persuasive principles have a greater influence on a person’s actions than others, with Reciprocity and Liking being the most effective. Our results differ from work investigating perceived persuasiveness, suggesting that what people perceive to be more persuasive is not necessarily what will persuade them to perform an action. Moreover, the study showed that people’s susceptibility to different principles is dependent on their personality traits, and it remains constant with time. The findings from this study have implications for future work on personalising persuasive strategies and designing digital behaviour change interventions.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge and thank all the volunteers who participated in the experiment and provided helpful comments. The first author is funded by an EPSRC doctoral training grant.

References

  1. 1.
    Cialdini, R.: The Psychology of Influence and Persuasion. NY Quill, New York (1991)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cialdini, R.: Pre-Suasion: A Revolutionary Way to Influence and Persuade. Simon & Schuster, New York (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ciocarlan, A., Masthoff, J., Oren, N.: Kindness is contagious: exploring engagement in a gamified persuasive intervention for wellbeing. In: Proceedings of Positive Gaming: Workshop on Gamification and Games for Wellbeing, ACM SIGCHI Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (CHI PLAY 2017). CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2055. CEUR-WS.org (2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ciocarlan, A., Masthoff, J., Oren, N.: Qualitative study into adapting persuasive games for mental wellbeing to personality, stressors and attitudes. In: Adjunct Publication of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, UMAP 2017, pp. 402–407. ACM, New York (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ciocarlan, A., Masthoff, J., Oren, N.: Kindness is contagious: study into exploring engagement and adapting persuasive games for wellbeing. In: Proceedings of the 26th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, UMAP 2018, pp. 311–319. ACM, New York (2018)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gosling, S.D., Rentfrow, P.J., Swann, W.B.J.: A very brief measure of the big five personality domains. J. Res. Pers. 37, 504–528 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Josekutty Thomas, R., Masthoff, J., Oren, N.: Adapting healthy eating messages to personality. In: de Vries, P.W., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Siemons, L., Beerlage-de Jong, N., van Gemert-Pijnen, L. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2017. LNCS, vol. 10171, pp. 119–132. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55134-0_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kaptein, M., De Ruyter, B., Markopoulos, P., Aarts, E.: Adaptive persuasive systems. ACM TIIS 2(2), 10:1–10:25 (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kaptein, M., Markopoulos, P., de Ruyter, B., Aarts, E.: Can you be persuaded? Individual differences in susceptibility to persuasion. In: Gross, T., et al. (eds.) INTERACT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5726, pp. 115–118. Springer, Heidelberg (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03655-2_13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kato, P.M., Cole, S.W., Bradlyn, A.S., Pollock, B.H.: A video game improves behavioral outcomes in adolescents and young adults with cancer: a randomized trial. Pediatrics 122(2), e305–e317 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khaled, R., Barr, P., Noble, J., Fischer, R., Biddle, R.: Fine Tuning the persuasion in persuasive games. In: de Kort, Y., IJsselsteijn, W., Midden, C., Eggen, B., Fogg, B.J. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4744, pp. 36–47. Springer, Heidelberg (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77006-0_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kraft, P., Drozd, F., Olsen, E.: ePsychology: designing theory-based health promotion interventions. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 24, 24 (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Masthoff, J., Grasso, F., Ham, J.: Preface to the special issue on personalization and behavior change. UMUAI 24(5), 345–350 (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    McCrae, R.R., John, O.P.: An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. J. Pers. 60(2), 175–215 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Michie, S., et al.: The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Behav. Med. 46(1), 81–95 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Norman, D.A.: Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things (2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Harjumaa, M.: A systematic framework for designing and evaluating persuasive systems. In: Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Hasle, P., Harjumaa, M., Segerståhl, K., Øhrstrøm, P. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5033, pp. 164–176. Springer, Heidelberg (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68504-3_15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Orji, R.: Design for behaviour change: a model-driven approach for tailoring persuasive technologies. Ph.D. thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Canada (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Orji, R., Mandryk, R.L., Vassileva, J.: Gender, age, and responsiveness to Cialdini’s persuasion strategies. In: MacTavish, T., Basapur, S. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2015. LNCS, vol. 9072, pp. 147–159. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20306-5_14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Oyibo, K., Orji, R., Vassileva, J.: Investigation of the influence of personality traits on Cialdini’s persuasive strategies. In: PPT@PERSUASIVE (2017)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rigby, S., Ryan, R.M.: Glued to Games: How Video Games Draw Us in and Hold Us Spellbound (2011)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Smith, K.A., Dennis, M., Masthoff, J.: Personalizing reminders to personality for melanoma self-checking. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on User Modeling Adaptation and Personalization, pp. 85–93. ACM (2016)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Thompson, D., Baranowski, T., Buday, R., et al.: Serious video games for health how behavioral science guided the development of a serious video game. Simul. Gaming 41(4), 587–606 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vargheese, J., Sripada, G., Masthoff, J., Oren, N.: Persuasive strategies for encouraging social interaction for older adults. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 32(3), 190–214 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of AberdeenAberdeenUK
  2. 2.Utrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations