Advertisement

Managing Uncertainty: Remarks for Future Policies and Practices

  • Elena PedeEmail author
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Geography book series (BRIEFSGEOGRAPHY)

Abstract

The chapter summarises the various elements of the changing period we are live in, giving some reflections regarding how to deal with the increasing risks. In the current context characterised by uncertainty, complexity and interdependencies, the concept of resilience has come to prominence in understanding and managing complex systems and its success has enhanced the interest of several research fields. However, the popularity of resilience thinking has not brought any conceptual clarity and, especially, any operational paradigm. For policy makers and practitioners, it is often not clear how to translate into practice the notions of resilience thinking. This chapter identifies some key implications of resilience thinking for management of hazards.

Keywords

Disaster risk management Uncertainty Resilience Practices Knowledge Learning process 

References

  1. Beck U (1996) Risk society and the provident state. In: Risk, environment and modernity: towards a new ecology. SAGE Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck U (2009) Critical theory of world risk society: a cosmopolitan vision. Constellations 16:3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bourbeau P (2015) Resilience and international politics: Premises, debates, agenda. Int Stud Rev 17:374–395Google Scholar
  4. Brand FS, Jax K (2007) Focusing the meaning (s) of resilience: resilience as a descriptive concept and a boundary object. Ecol Soc 12Google Scholar
  5. Cash DW, Adger WN, Berkes F et al (2006) Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecol Soc 11:8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chandler D, Coaffee J (2017) The Routledge handbook of international resilience. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Folke C, Carpenter S, Elmqvist T et al (2002) Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. AMBIO: A J Hum Environ 31:437–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gunderson LH, Holling CS (2002) Panarchy: understanding transformations in systems of humans and nature. Island, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  9. Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. IPCC (2018) Global Warning of 1.5 °C (SR15). Summary for PolicymakersGoogle Scholar
  11. Polanyi M (2009) The tacit dimension. University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  12. Restemeyer B, van den Brink M, Woltjer J (2018) Resilience unpacked–framing of ‘uncertainty’and ‘adaptability’in long-term flood risk management strategies for London and Rotterdam. Eur Plan Stud 1–21Google Scholar
  13. Smith K (2009) Environmental hazards: assessing risk and reducing disaster, 5°edn. Routledge, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. UNDP (2011) Towards human resilience: sustaining MDG program in an age of economic uncertaintyGoogle Scholar
  15. UNISDR (2005) Hyogo framework for action 2005-2015. ISDR International strategy for disaster reduction; building the resilience of nations and communities to disastersGoogle Scholar
  16. UNISDR (2015) Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. In 3rd United Nations World Conference on DRRGoogle Scholar
  17. Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig A (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9:5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Weichselgartner J, Pigeon P (2015) The role of knowledge in disaster risk reduction. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 6:107–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wenger E (2000) Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization 7:225–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Interuniversity Department of Regional and Urban Studies and PlanningPolitecnico di TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations