Advertisement

Key Concepts of Social Inequalities

  • Alfredo MelaEmail author
  • Alessia Toldo
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Geography book series (BRIEFSGEOGRAPHY)

Abstract

This second chapter analyses with a critical approach a set of key concepts for the study of social inequalities. In relation to each of them, some definitions will be compared, highlighting the theoretical differences underlying them and the possible consequences of their use in the construction of urban policies. At the same time, the similarities and differences between these concepts will be highlighted, trying to make the reader aware of the risks deriving from an improper use of them. These key words are divided into three groups. The first is related to some fundamental concepts referring to the insertion of specific groups of social actors in a social system, such as integration, inclusion , as well as terms with opposite meanings and, in particular, exclusion and expulsion. The second group takes into consideration concepts more directly linked to urban processes; in particular, terms like segregation , spatial polarisation, and urban dualism . Finally, the third group includes terms related to social and cultural processes that strengthen inequalities between social groups and favour the assignment of marginal roles to minorities: in this sense, therefore, the concepts related to the symbolic power, such as stigmatisation and discrimination are taken into consideration.

Keyword

Social integration Social cohesion Modernity Elite Inclusion Capabilities Segregation Social polarisation Dualism Symbolic power Stigmatisation and discrimination 

References

  1. Adler S, Brenner J (1992) Gender and space: lesbians and gay men in the city. Int J Urban RegNal Res 16(1):24–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen HS (2003) Urban sores: on the interaction between segregation, urban decay, and deprived neighbourhoods. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  3. Archer M (1996) Social integration and system integration: developing the distinction. Sociology 30(4):679–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkinson R (2008) The flowing enclave and the misanthropy of networked affluence. In: Blokland T, Savage M (eds) Networked urbanism: social capital in the city. Ashgate Publishing, Farnha p, pp 41–58Google Scholar
  5. Atkinson R (2016) Limited exposure: Social concealment, mobility and engagement with public space by the super-rich in London. Environ Plan A Econ Space 48(7):1302–1317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bauman Z (2000) Liquid modernity. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Bauman Z (2001) The individualized society. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Beck U (1986) Risikogesellschaft: Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Suhrkamp, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  9. Bell W (1954) A probability model for the measurement of ecological segregation. Soc Forces 32:337–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Benson M (2013) Postcoloniality and privilege in new lifestyles flows: the case of North Americans in Panama. Mobilities 8(3):313–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blakely EJ, Snyder MG (1997) Fortress America: gating communities in the United States. Brookings Institution Press and Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  12. Birtchnell T, Caletrío J (2013) (eds) Elite mobilities. Routledge, London-New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Bourdieu P (1991) Langage et pouvoir symbolique. Seuil, ParisGoogle Scholar
  14. Calame J, Charlesworth E (2011) Divided cities: Belfast, Beirut, Jerusalem, Mostar, and Nicosia. University of Pennsylvania Press, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  15. Coy M (2006) Gated communities and urban fragmentation in Latin America: the Brazilian experience. GeoJournal 66(1–2):121–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cole T (2013) Holocaust city: the making of a Jewish ghetto. Routledge, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cousin B, Chauvin S (2015) Vers une hyperbourgeoisie globalisée? In: Badie B, Vidal D (eds) Un monde d’inégalités. L’état du monde, La Découverte, Paris, pp 148–154Google Scholar
  18. De Cauter L (2004) The capsular civilization. On the city in the age of fear. NAi Publishers, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  19. Delmelle EC (2015) Five decades of neighborhood classifications and their transitions: A comparison of four US cities, 1970–2010. Appl Geogr 57:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Deranty JP (2008) Work and the precarisation of existence. Eur J Soc Theory 11(4):443–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dorling D (2018) The 1 percent and the rest: not just a slogan. In: Clark GL, Feldman MP, Gertler MS, Wójcik D (eds) The New Oxford handbook of economic geography. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 39–62Google Scholar
  22. Duclos D (2002) Société-monde. Le temps des ruptures, La Découverte, ParisGoogle Scholar
  23. Duncan OD, Duncan B (1955) A methodological analysis of segregation indexes. Am Sociol Rev 20:210–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Durkheim E (1983) De la division du travail social: étude sur l’organisation des sociétés supérieures. Alcan, ParisGoogle Scholar
  25. Fainstein S, Gordan I, Harloe M (1992) (eds) Divided cities: New York and London in the contem-porary world. Basil Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  26. Feitosa FF, Camara G, Monteiro AMV, Koschitzki T et al (2007) Global and local spatial indices of urban segregation. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 21(3):299–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Foote N, Walter R (2017) Neighbourhood and socioeconomic change in emerging megapolitan nodes: tracking shifting social geographies in three rapidly growing United States metropolitan areas, 1980–2010. Urban Geogr 38(8):1203–1230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gale R (2013) Religious residential segregation and internal migration: the British Muslim case. Environ Plan A 45(4):872–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Garbin D, Millington G (2012) Territorial stigma and the politics of resistance in a Parisian banlieue: La Courneuve and beyond. Urban Stud 49(10):2067–2083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Goffman E (1974) Stigma: notes on the management of spoiled identity. Jason Aronson, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Grant J, Mittelsteadt L (2004) Types of gated communities. Environ Plan B Plan Des 31(6):913–930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Habermas J (1984) The theory of communicative action: lifeworld and system: a critique of functionalist reason.-Cop. 1987.-457, S. Beacon press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  33. Harvey D (2014) Seventeen contradictions and the end of capitalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford-New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Knox P, Pinch S (2006) Urban social geography. An introduction, 5th edn. Pearson, Harlow, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Lagory M, Ward R, Juravich T (1980) The age segregation process: Explanation for American cities. Urban Aff Q 16(1):59–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Laino G (2016) Il palazzo delle donne sole. Dinamiche urbane in un condominio napoletano. Territorio 7:7–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lapeyronnie D (2008) Ghetto urbain. Ségrégation, pauvreté, violence en France aujourd’hui, Robert Laffont, ParisGoogle Scholar
  38. Link BG, Phelan JC (2001) Conceptualizing stigma. Annu Rev Sociol 27(1):363–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lockwood D (1964) Social integration and system integration. In: Zollschan GK, Hirsch HW (eds) Explorations in social change. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  40. Maloutas T, Karadimitriou N (2001) Vertical social differentiation in athens: alternative or complement to community segregation? Int J Urban Regional Res 25(4):699–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Marcuse P (1993) What’s so new about divided cities? Int J Urban Regional Res 17(3):355–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Massey DS (1990) American apartheid: segregation and the making of the underclass. Am J Sociol 96(2):329–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Marcuse P (1997) The enclave, the citadel, and the ghetto: What has changed in the post-Fordist US city. Urban Aff Rev 33(2):228–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Massey DS, Denton NA (1988) The dimensions of residential segregation. Social forces 67(2):281–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Massey DS, Denton NA (1989) Hypersegregation in U.S. metropolitan areas: black and hispanic segregation along five dimensions. Demography 26:373–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mela A (2014) Urban public space between fragmentation, control and conflict. City Territ Arch 1(1):15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Merton RK (1948) The self-fulfilling prophecy. Antioch Rev 8(2):193–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mouzelis N (1997) Social and system integration: Lockwood, Habermas. Giddens Sociol 31(1):111–119Google Scholar
  49. Musterd S (2005) Social and ethnic segregation in Europe: levels, causes, and effects. J Urban Aff 27(3):331–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nagle J (2009) Sites of social centrality and segregation: Lefebvre in Belfast, a “divided city”. Antipode 41(2):326–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nussbaum M (2011) Creating capabilities: the human development approach. Harvard University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. OECD (2011) In: International Conference on Social Cohesion and Development. Background, Paris, 20–21 Jan. 2011. http://www.oecd.org/dev/pgd/internationalconferenceonsocialcohesionanddevelopment.htm. Accessed 23 Nov 2018
  53. Offe C (1985) Disorganized capitalism: contemporary transformations of work and politics. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  54. O’Loughlin J V, Friedrichs J (1996) (eds). Social polarization in post-industrial metropolises. Walter de Gruyter, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  55. Oxfam (2018) Reward Work, not Wealth, https://www.oxfam.org/en/research/reward-work-not-wealth. Accessed 18 Oct 2018
  56. Parsons T, Smelser NJ (1956) Economy and society: a study in the integration of economic and social theory. Routledge & Kegan Paul, LondonGoogle Scholar
  57. Pirez P (2002) Buenos Aires: fragmentation and privatization of the metropolitan city. Environ Urban 14(1):145–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Phillips D (2006) Parallel lives? challenging discourses of British Muslim self-segregation. Environ Plan D Soc Space 24(1):25–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Powell R, Lever J (2017) Europe’s perennial “outsiders”: a processual approach to Roma stigmatization and ghettoization. Curr Sociol 65(5):680–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pratschke J, Morlicchio E (2012) Social polarisation, the labour market and economic restructuring in Europe: an urban perspective. Urban Stud 49(9):1891–1907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rahman Khan S (2012) The sociology of elites. Annu Rev Sociol 38:361–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ryan L (2011) Muslim women negotiating collective stigmatization: ‘We’re just normal people’. Sociology 45(6):1045–1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sager T (2011) Neo-liberal urban planning policies: a literature survey 1990–2010. Prog Plan 76(4):147–199Google Scholar
  64. Sassen S (1991) The global city: New York. Tokyo, Princeton University Press, Princeton, LondonGoogle Scholar
  65. Sassen S. (2014) Expulsions. Brutality and complexity in the global economy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  66. Secchi B (2013) La città dei ricchi e la città dei poveri. Laterza, Roma-BariGoogle Scholar
  67. Sen A (1985) Commodities and capabilities. North-Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  68. Smith DM (2003) (ed) The apartheid city and beyond: Urbanization and social change in South Africa. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  69. Spring A L (2013) Decline segregation of same-sex partners: evidence fron censuses 2000 and 2010. Population Research and Policy Review 32(%):687–716Google Scholar
  70. Sonnenberg B (2014) Social integration and social involvement from a societal and individual perspective. Socio-economic panel study (SOEP). Dependencies and mechanisms of unemployment and social involvement. Springer, Wiesbaden, pp 25–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Strömgren M, Tammaru T, Danzer AM, van Ham M, Marcinczak S, Stjernström O, Lindgren U (2014) Factors shaping workplace segregation between natives and immigrants. Demography 51(2):645–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Taguieff PA (2018) Judéophobie, la dernière vague. Fayard, ParisGoogle Scholar
  73. Tammaru C, Marcińczak TS, van Ham M, Musterd S (2015) A multi-factor approach to understanding socio-economic segregation in European capital cities. In Tammaru C, Marcińczak TS, van Ham M, Musterd S (2015) (eds) Socio-Economic Segregation in European Capital Cities, Routledge, London, pp 25–53Google Scholar
  74. Thomas WI, Thomas DS (1928) The child in America: behavior problems and programs. Knop, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  75. van Ham M, Tammaru T (2016) New perspectives on ethnic segregation over time and space. A domains approach. Urban Geogr 37(7):953–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Van Kempen R, Murie A (2009) The new divided city: changing patterns in European cities. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 100(4):377–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Van Kempen R, Şule Özüekren A (1998) Ethnic segregation in cities: new forms and explanations in a dynamic world. Urban Stud 35(10):1631–1656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wacquant L (2010) Urban desolation and symbolic denigration in the hyperghetto. Soc Psychol Q 73(3):215–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wacquant L, Slater T, Pereira VB (2014) Territorial stigmatization in action. Environ Plan A 46(6):1270–1280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Walks RA (2001) The social ecology of the post-Fordist/global city? Economic restructuring and socio-spatial polarisation in the Toronto urban region. Urban Stud 38(3):407–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Webster C, Glasze G, Frantz K (2002) The global spread of gated communities. Environ Plan B Plan Des 29(3):315–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wellman B (2001) The rise of networked individualism. In: Keeble L (ed) Community networks online. Taylor & Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  83. Wirth L (1938) Urbanism as a Way of Life. Am J Sociol 44(1):1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Woolcock M (2011) What distinctive contribution can social cohesion make to development theory, research, and policy? In: Presentation, Paper presented at the OECD International Conference on Social Cohesion and Development, ParisGoogle Scholar
  85. Wong D (2009) The modifiable areal unit problem (MAUP). The SAGE handbook of spatial analysis, pp 105–123Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Interuniversity Department of Urban and Regional StudiesPolitecnico di TorinoTorinoItaly
  2. 2.Department of Cultures, Politics and SocietyUniversità di TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations