• Berry BillingsleyEmail author
  • Keith Chappell
  • Michael J. Reiss
Part of the Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education book series (CTISE, volume 48)


Questions which bridge science and religion cross many boundaries, and this is especially the case in schools and other educational institutions. The boundaries that a curriculum puts around different types of knowledge and different ways of constructing knowledge work well in so many ways in education, but they can become barriers to asking and exploring questions that bridge science and religion if they become systematic and entrenched. At the heart of this book and this introductory chapter, there is a belief that a model of the relationship between science and religion that presumes conflict to be the only way in which they can be viewed does neither science nor religion justice.


  1. Atkins, P. (2011). On being: A scientist’s exploration of the great questions of existence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Billingsley, B. & Abedin, M. (2016). Primary children’s perspectives on questions that bridge science and religion: Findings from a survey study in England. Paper presented at the BERA (British Education Research Association) annual conference, Leeds.Google Scholar
  3. Billingsley, B., Taber, K., Riga, F., & Newdick, H. (2012). Secondary school students’ epistemic insight into the relationships between science and religion; a preliminary enquiry. Research in Science Education, 1–18.
  4. Billingsley, B., Riga, F., Taber, K. S., & Newdick, H. (2014). Secondary school teachers’ perspectives on teaching about topics that bridge science and religion. The Curriculum Journal, 25(3), 372–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Billingsley, B., Borgeaud, J. & Knapp, Z. (2016). Teaching science and religion: Student teacher perceptions. Paper presented at the Values and Education, Winchester.Google Scholar
  6. Billingsley, B., Nassji, M., Fraser, S., & Lawson, F. (2018). A framework for epistemic insight. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1115–1131. Scholar
  7. DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ecklund, E. H., & Scheitle, C. P. (2018). Religion vs. science: What religious people really think. York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Ecklund, E. H., Johnson, D. R., Vaidyanathan, B., Kirstin, R. W., Matthews, K. R. W., Lewis, S. W., Thomson, R. A., Jr., & Di, D. (2019). Secularity and science: What scientists around the world really think about religion. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gingerich, O. (1982). The Galileo affair. Scientific American, 247(August), 118–127.Google Scholar
  11. Gould, S. J. (1997). Nonoverlapping magisteria. Natural History, 106(2), 16–22.Google Scholar
  12. Hardin, J., Numbers, R. L., & Binzley, R. A. (Eds.). (2018). The warfare between science and religion: The idea that wouldn’t die. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Harrison, P. (2015). The territories of science and religion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Konnemann, C., Asshoff, R., & Hammann, M. (2016). Insights into the diversity of attitudes concerning evolution andc creation: A multidimensional approach. Science Education.
  15. McComas, W. F. (2008). Seeking historical examples to illustrate key aspects of the nature of science. Science & Education, 17(2–3), 249–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mujtaba, T., Reiss, M. J., & Stones, A. (2017). Epistemic insight: Teaching about science and RE in secondary schools. School Science Review, 99(367), 67–75.Google Scholar
  17. Newall, E. (2017). Evolution, insight and truth? School Science Review, 99(367), 61–66.Google Scholar
  18. Poole, M. (2007). User’s guide to science and belief: Questions of faith. Oxford: Lion.Google Scholar
  19. Reiss, M. J. (2008). Should science educators deal with the science/religion issue? Studies in Science Education, 44, 157–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Reiss, M. J. (2013). Religion in science education. In N. Mansour & R. Wegerif (Eds.), Science education for diversity: Theory and practice (pp. 317–328). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Reiss, M. J. (2014). What significance does Christianity have for science education? In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), Handbook of historical and philosophical research in science education (pp. 1637–1662). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Ryan, M. J. (2018). A taste for the beautiful: The evolution of attraction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Scott, E. (1999). The creation/evolution continuum. Reports of the National Center for Science Education, 19, 16–23.Google Scholar
  24. Stanley, M. (2007). Practical mystic: Religion, science, and A. S. Eddington. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Stanley, M. (2015). Huxley’s church and Maxwell’s demon: From theistic science to naturalistic science. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Stolberg, T., & Teece, G. (2010). Teaching religion and science: Effective pedagogy and practical approaches for RE teachers. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tracy, J. L., Hart, J., & Martens, J. P. (2011). Death and science: The existential underpinnings of belief in intelligent design and discomfort with evolution. PLoS One, 6(3), e17349. Scholar
  28. Wagner, R., & Briggs, A. (2016). The penultimate curiosity: How science swims in the slipstream of ultimate questions. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ward, K. (2008). The big questions in science and religion. In West Conshohocken. Pennsylvania: Templeton Foundation Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Berry Billingsley
    • 1
    Email author
  • Keith Chappell
    • 1
  • Michael J. Reiss
    • 2
  1. 1.LASAR (Learning about Science and Religion)Canterbury Christ Church UniversityCanterburyUK
  2. 2.Institute of EducationUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations