Advertisement

History and Philosophy of Science: A Lever to Teach Energy at High School

  • Manuel BächtoldEmail author
  • Valérie Munier
Chapter
  • 298 Downloads
Part of the Contributions from Science Education Research book series (CFSE, volume 6)

Abstract

In this paper, we present and discuss a teaching strategy for the concept of energy at high school based on history and philosophy of science (HPS) and dealing with Joule’s experiment (Joule J. Philos Mag 3(31):173–176, 1847a) and Rankine’s definition (Rankine W. Edinburgh New Philos J 3:121–141, 1855). This sequence has been developed and implemented in the frame of a collaborative and iterative work involving researchers and teachers. On the one hand, we investigated the extent to which it makes sense for teachers to introduce HPS in their teaching of energy. Video recordings of classroom practices and semi-structured interviews show that HPS can help teachers to think and develop links between the different activities dealing with energy; moreover, they consider the activities based on HPS both as a very good means for raising students’ interest in energy and as helping them to understand this concept. On the other hand, we assessed students’ understanding of energy using a quantitative method based on pre- and post-tests along with qualitative analysis of videos produced by students. The outcomes suggest that the teaching strategy was effective for many students regarding their understanding of both the notion of energy transformation and the principle of energy conservation. In the light of these outcomes, we discuss the possible contribution of HPS for conceiving new strategies for science teaching.

Keywords

Energy Energy conservation History of science Philosophy of science 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Muriel Guedj, Alain Lerouge and André Ranquet for their contribution to the development of the HPS-based teaching strategy. We are also grateful to the three teachers who took part in the research: Delphine Ferran-Broussou, Régis Galmiche and Pierre Méjean.

References

  1. Arons, A. (1999). Development of energy concepts in introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 67(12), 1063–1067.  https://doi.org/10.1119/1.19182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bächtold, M. (2018). How should energy be defined throughout schooling? Research in Science Education, 48(2), 345–367.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9571-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bächtold, M., & Guedj, M. (2014). Teaching energy informed by the history and epistemology of the concept with implications for teacher education. In M. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 211–243). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Bächtold, M., & Munier, V. (2018). Teaching energy at high school by making use of history and philosophy of science: A sequence based on Joule’s experiment and Rankine’s definition. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bächtold, M., Munier, V., Guedj, M., Lerouge, A., & Ranquet, A. (2014). Quelle progression dans l’enseignement de l’énergie de l’école au lycée ? Une analyse des programmes et des manuels. Recherches en Didactique des Sciences et des Technologies, 10, 63–92.  https://doi.org/10.4000/rdst.932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bächtold, M., Munier, V., Guedj, M., Lerouge, A. & Ranquet, A. (2016). Teaching energy in the light of the history and epistemology of the concept. In Proceedings of the GIREPEPEC 2015 conference, Wrocław, Poland, 6–10 July 2015.Google Scholar
  7. Balibar, F. (2010). Énergie. In D. Lecourt (Ed.), Dictionnaire d’histoire et philosophie des sciences (pp. 403–408). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  8. Brewe, E. (2011). Energy as a substance like quantity that flows: Theoretical considerations and pedagogical consequences. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research, 7, 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bunge, M. (2000). Energy: Between physics and metaphysics. Science & Education, 9, 457–461.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025364722916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3699928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coelho, R. (2009). On the concept of energy: How understanding its history can improve physics teaching. Science & Education, 18, 961–983.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9128-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Colonnese, D., Heron, P., Michelini, M., Santi, L., & Stefanel, A. (2012). A vertical pathway for teaching and learning the concept of energy. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 6(1), 21–50.Google Scholar
  13. Cotignola, M., Bordogna, C., Punte, G., & Cappannini, O. (2002). Difficulties in learning thermodynamic concepts: Are they linked to the historical development of this field? Science & Education, 11, 279–291.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015205123254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Berg, K. (1997). The development of the concept of work: A case study where history can inform pedagogy. Science & Education, 6, 511–527.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008642713225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Doménech, J.-L., Gil-Pérez, D., Gras-Marti, A., et al. (2007). Teaching of energy issues: A debate proposal for a global reorientation. Science & Education, 16, 43–64.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-005-5036-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Driver, R., & Warrington, L. (1985). Students’ use of the principle of energy conservation in problem situation. Physics Education, 5, 171–175.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/20/4/308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Duit, R. (1984). Learning the energy concept in school: Empirical results from the Philippines and West Germany. Physics Education, 19, 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Duit, R. (1987). Should energy be introduced as something quasi-material? International Journal of Science Education, 9, 139–145.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069870090202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eisenkraft, A., Nordine, J., Chen, R., Fortus, D., Krajcik, J., Neumann, K., & Scheff, A. (2014). Introduction: Why focus on energy instruction? In R. Chen, A. Eisenkraft, D. Fortus, J. Krajcik, K. Neumann, J. C. Nordine, & A. Scheff (Eds.), Teaching and learning of energy in K-12 education (pp. 1–11). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Elkana, Y. (1974). The discovery of the conservation of energy. London: Hutchinson Educational.Google Scholar
  21. Falk, G., Hermann, F., & Schmid, G. (1983). Energy forms or energy carriers? American Journal of Physics, 51(12), 1074–1077.  https://doi.org/10.1119/1.13340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gilbert, J., & Pope, M. (1986). Small group discussions about conception in science: A case study. Research in Science and Technological Education, 4, 61–76.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514860040107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harman, P. (1982). Energy, force and matter: The conceptual development of nineteenth century physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harrison, A., Grayson, D., & Treagust, D. (1999). Investigating a grade 11 student’s evolving conceptions of heat and temperature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(1), 55–87.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199901)36:1<55::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jewett, J. (2008). Energy and the confused student III: Language. The Physics Teacher, 46(3), 149–153.  https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2840978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Joule, J. (1847a). On the mechanical equivalent of heat, as determined by the heat evolved by the friction of fluids. Philosophical Magazine, 3(31), 173–176.Google Scholar
  27. Joule, J. (1847b). On matter, living force, and heat. Published in the Manchester Courier newspaper, May 5 and 12. Reprinted in The Scientific Papers of James Prescott Joule, Vol. 1, 1884 (pp. 265–276). Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  28. Kuhn, T. (1959). Energy conservation as an example of simultaneous discovery. In M. Clagett (Ed.), Critical problems in the history of science (pp. 321–356). Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lacy, S., Tobin, R. G., Wiser, M., & Crissman, S. (2014). Looking through the energy lens: A proposed teaching progression for energy in grades 3-5. In R. Chen et al. (Eds.), Teaching and learning of energy in K-12 education (pp. 241–265). Cham/Heidelberg/New York/Dordrecht/London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee, H.-S., & Liu, O. (2010). Assessing learning progression of energy concepts across middle school grades: The knowledge integration perspective. Science Education, 94(4), 665–688.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lehavi, Y., & Bat-Sheva, E. (2018). Integrating science education research and history and philosophy of science in developing an energy curriculum. In M. Matthews (Ed.), History, philosophy and science teaching: New perspectives (pp. 235–260). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lehavi, Y., Yosovich, A., & Barak, S. (2016). Bringing joule back to school. School Science Review, 97(361), 9–14.Google Scholar
  33. Lewis, E., & Linn, M. (1994). Heat energy and temperature concepts of adolescents, adults, and experts: Implications for curricular improvements. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(6), 657–677.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lindsay, R. (1975). Energy: Historical development of the concept. Stroudsburg, Pa: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross.Google Scholar
  35. Liu, X., & McKeough, A. (2005). Developmental growth in students’ concept of energy: Analysis of selected items from the TIMSS database. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(5), 493–517.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Matthews, M. (1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Meyerson, E. (1908). Identité et réalité. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
  38. Millar, R. (2005). Teaching about energy. Department of Educational Studies: Research paper 2005/11. Retrieved from: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/129328/1/2005_Millar_Teaching_about_energy.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2018
  39. Neumann, K., Viering, T., Boone, W., & Fischer, H. (2013). Towards a learning progression of energy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(2), 162–188.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  41. Nordine, J., Krajcik, J., & Fortus, D. (2011). Transforming energy instruction in middle school to support integrated understanding and future learning. Science Education, 95(4), 670–699.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Papadouris, N., & Constantinou, C. (2016). Investigating middle school students’ ability to develop energy as a framework for analyzing simple physical phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(1), 119–145.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Poincaré, H. (1968 [1902]). La science et l’hypothèse. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
  44. Rankine, W. (1855). Outlines of the science of energetics. The Edinburgh New Philosophical Journal, 3, 121–141.Google Scholar
  45. Rizaki, A., & Kokkotas, P. (2013). The use of history and philosophy of science: As a core for a socioconstructivist teaching approach of the concept of energy in primary education. Science & Education, 22, 1141–1165.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-009-9213-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sandoval, W. (2013). Educational design research in the 21st century. In R. Luckin, J. Underwood, N. Winters, P. Goodyear, B. Grabowski, & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), Handbook of design in educational technology (pp. 388–396). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  47. Smith, C. (2003). Force, energy, and thermodynamics. In M. J. Nye (Ed.), The Cambridge history of science: The modern physical and mathematical sciences (pp. 289–310). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Solomon, J. (1985). Teaching the conservation of energy. Physics Education, 20, 165–170.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/20/4/307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Trellu, J.-L., & Toussaint, J. (1986). La conservation, un grand principe. Aster, 2, 43–87.Google Scholar
  50. Trumper, R. (1990). Being constructive: An alternative approach to the teaching of the energy concept, part one. International Journal of Science Education, 12(4), 343–354.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069910130101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Trumper, R. (1993). Children’s energy concepts: A cross-age study. International Journal of Science Education, 15, 139–148.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069930150203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Van Huis, C., & van den Berg, E. (1993). Teaching energy: A systems approach. Physics Education, 28, 146–153.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/28/3/003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Warren, J. (1982). The nature of energy. European Journal of Science Education, 4(3), 295–297.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528820040308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Watts, D. (1983). Some alternative views of energy. Physics Education, 18, 213–217.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/18/5/307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LIRDEF (EA 3749)University of Montpellier and University Paul Valery of MontpellierMontpellierFrance

Personalised recommendations