Advertisement

Frantic Standstill and Lack of Future: How Can Science Education Take Care of Students’ Distopic Perceptions of Time?

  • Giulia TasquierEmail author
  • Laura Branchetti
  • Olivia Levrini
Chapter
Part of the Contributions from Science Education Research book series (CFSE, volume 6)

Abstract

The paper is framed within a broader research programme aimed at investigating how science education can enhance the formation of what we call future-scaffolding skills: the abilities to construct visions of the future that support possible ways of acting in the present with one’s eye on the horizon. To this end, we designed a module (targeted at secondary school students) on climate change, focused on causal modelling in science of complex systems and enriched with future-oriented activities. The study presented here reports on the second implementation of the module, carried out in a weekly summer school for a mixed class of 39 voluntary high school students (17–18 years old) from different secondary schools in Italy. The results confirm trends already observed in a previous pilot study: the present evolves from being perceived as a frantic standstill to becoming viewed as a collection of events that can be organized in a comprehensible picture; the future from being distant and unimaginable becomes instead conceivable as a set of possibilities, addressable through concrete actions and within the students’ reach (in the sense that they found room to see themselves as agents of their own future). Moreover, the analysis contributes to our theoretical reflection on future-scaffolding skills, by highlighting specific structural and dynamical skills that can be developed and recognized in the implementation of our modules.

Keywords

Future-oriented science education Climate change Secondary school students 

References

  1. Anfara, V. A., Brown, K. M., & Mangione, T. L. (2002). Qualitative analysis on stage: Making the research process more public. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 28–38.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031007028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barelli, E., Branchetti, L., Tasquier, G., Albertazzi, L., & Levrini, O. (2018). Science of complex systems and citizenship skills: A pilot study with adult citizens. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 14(4), 1533–1545.  https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/84841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benasayag, M., & Schmit, G. (2006). Les passions tristes: souffrance psychique et crise sociale. Paris: La Découverte press.Google Scholar
  4. Branchetti, L., Cutler, M., Laherto, A., Levrini, O., Palmgren, E. K., Tasquier, G., & Wilson, C. (2018). The I SEE project: An approach to futurize STEM education. Visions for Sustainability, 9.  https://doi.org/10.13135/2384-8677/2770.
  5. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A. A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. diSessa, A. A., & Cobb, P. (2004). Ontological innovation and the role of theory in design experiments. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 13(1), 77–103.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eurobarometer. (2015). Public opinion on future innovations, science and technology, National report Italy, Eurobarometer qualitative study, June 2015.Google Scholar
  8. Kapon, S., Laherto, A., & Levrini, O. (2018). Disciplinary authenticity and personal relevance in school science. Science Education, 102(5), 1077–1106.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Leccardi, C. (2009). Sociologie del tempo. Soggetti e tempo nella società dell’accelerazione. Eds Laterza.Google Scholar
  10. Levrini, O., Fantini, P., Pecori, B., Tasquier, G., & Levin, M. (2015). Defining and operationalizing ‘appropriation’ for science learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(1), 93–136.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2014.928215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Levrini, O., Levin, M., Fantini, P., & Tasquier, G. (2018). Orchestration of classroom discussions that foster appropriation. Science Education, 103(1), 206–235.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Levrini, O., Tasquier, G., Branchetti, L., & Barelli, E. (under review). Developing future-scaffolding skills through science education. Submitted to International Journal of Science Education. Google Scholar
  13. Paige, K., & Lloyd, D. (2016). Use of future scenarios as a pedagogical approach for science teacher education. Research in Science Education, 46(2), 263–285.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9505-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (Eds.). (2013). Educational design research. Enschede: SLO.Google Scholar
  15. Rosa, H. (2013). Beschleunigung und Entfremdung – Entwurf einer kritischen Theorie spätmoderner Zeitlichkeit, Suhrkamp (Eng. Trans: Acceleration and Alienation – Towards a Critical Theory of Late-Modern Temporality, 2015).Google Scholar
  16. Stuckey, M., Hofstein, A., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Eilks, I. (2013). The meaning of ‘relevance’ in science education and its implications for the science curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 49(1), 1–34.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.802463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tasquier, G., & Pongiglione, F. (2017). The influence of causal knowledge on the willingness to change attitude toward climate change: Results from an empirical study. International Journal of Science Education, 39(13), 1846–1868.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1355078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tasquier, G., Levrini, O., & Dillon, J. (2016). Exploring students’ epistemological knowledge of models and modelling in science: Results from a teaching/learning experience on climate change. International Journal of Science Education, 38(4), 539–563.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1148828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tasquier, G., Levrini, O., Laherto, A., Palmgren, E., & Wilson, C. (2018). The challenge of working with the future within STEM education. In Paper presented at the 13th International Conference on the Learning Sciences “Rethinking learning in the digital age: Making the Learning Sciences count”. London 23–27 June, 2018.Google Scholar
  20. Venturelli, I. (2015). Cittadinanza scientifica e educazione al futuro: analisi di una sperimenta zione didattica sui cambiamenti climatici in una classe quarta di liceo scientifico. Master Thesis.Google Scholar
  21. Voros, J. (2003). A generic foresight process framework. Foresight, 5(3), 10–21.  https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680310698379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physics and Astronomy, Alma Mater StudiorumUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics, Physics and Computer ScienceUniversity of ParmaParmaItaly

Personalised recommendations