Advertisement

Ethnic Nationalism, Social Darwinism, and Alternative Modernities

  • Paul S. Chung
Chapter

Abstract

The prior investigations of postcolonial political theology and mimicry lead us to this chapter which includes a case study of previously colonialized nation, South Korea by Japan. It focuses on colonial modernity, alternative modernities, and the postcolonial epistemology, especially in dealing with the political and cultural problems of South Korea. The reason for this study is relevant to my previous critical undertaking of social Darwinism, which remains an undercurrent in its racially oriented nationalism in South Korea. A debate of the modernization thesis or colonial modernity is undertaken in treating the period of Japanese colonialism. This debate leads to a subsequent inquiry of ethnic nationalism and social Darwinism, which was shaped during the Japanese colonial period. To advance the thesis of civil nationalism, I take issue with the idea of Eurocentrism and develop a postcolonial project of political theology and trans-modernity. I conceptualize the significance of multiple or alternative modernities within the context of the critical theory and seek to overcome the limitations of the modernization theory and ethno-nationalism toward the postcolonial political theology.

Bibliography

  1. Ashcroft, Bill. “Alternative Modernities: Globalization and the Post-Colonial,” 1–25. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292505346_Alternative_Modernities_Globalization_and_the_Post-Colonial
  2. Barlow, T. E. “Introduction: On ‘Colonial Modernity’,” in Formations of Colonial Modernity in East Asia, ed. T. E. Barlow. Durham/London, Duke University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  3. Bhabha, H. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
  4. Bush, Christopher. “Modernism in East Asia,” https://www.rem.routledge.com/articles/overview/contexts-for-modernism
  5. Calhoun, Craig (1993), “Nationalism and Ethnicity,” Annual Review of Sociology 19, 211–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chakrabarty, Dipesh Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  7. Cho, Younghan (2012), “Colonial Modernity Matters?: Debates on Colonial Past in South Korea,” Cultural Studies, 3. 645–669. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09502386.2012.697709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Choi, Chungmoo, The Comfort Women: Colonialism, War, and Sex. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  9. Dittrich, Klaus (2013), “Korea’s Internal Civilizing Mission: Education in the English Edition of The Independent, 1896–1989,” Acta Koreana 16(2), 431–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duchrow, Ulrich and Franz J. Hinkelammert, Transcending Greedy Money: Interreligious Solidarity for Just Relations. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eckert, Carter J, Ki-Back Lee, Young Ick Lew, Michael W. Wagner, Korea Old and New: A History. Seoul, Korea: Ilchokak; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  12. Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. (2000), S. N. “Multiple Modernities.” Daedalus, 1–29.Google Scholar
  13. _______. Comparative Civilizations and Multiple Modernities. Leiden: Boston Brill Academic Publishers, 2003.Google Scholar
  14. Foucault, Michel. The Essential Foucault: Selections from the Essential Works of Foucault, 1954–1984, eds. Paul Rabinow and Nikolas Rose. London and New York: The New Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  15. Gandhi, Leela. Postcolonial Theory: A Critical Introduction. New York: Columbia University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  16. Geertz, Clifford. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books, 1973.Google Scholar
  17. Gilroy, Paul. The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  18. Glissant, Edouard Caribbean Discourse: Selected Essays, trans. J. Michael Dash. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  19. Habermas, J. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, trans. Frederick Lawrence. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  20. ———. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, trans. W. Regh. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  21. Hobsbawm, E. Nations and Nationalism Since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  22. Isomae, Jun’ichi, “Discursive Formation around ‘Shinto’ in Colonial Korea,” https://voices.uchicago.edu/religionculture/2012/09/
  23. Masayoshi, Sumika (2016), “Nationalism, Religion, and Social Darwinism Nation and Religion in the Works of Katō Genchi and Liang Qichao,” Religious Studies in Japan 3, 21–39.Google Scholar
  24. McCarthy, Thomas. “On Reconciling Cosmopolitan Unity and National Diversity,” Alternative Modernities, 197–236.Google Scholar
  25. Nessan, Craig L. The Vitality of Liberation Theology. Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2012.Google Scholar
  26. Oguma, Eiji. A Genealogy of Japanese Self-Images. Melbourne, Australia: Trans Pacific Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  27. Park, Sunyoung. The Proletarian Wave: Literature and Leftist Culture in Colonial Korea, 1910–1945. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2015.Google Scholar
  28. Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  29. Robinson, Michael (1984), “National Identity and the Thought of Sin Ch’aeho,” Journal of Korean Studies 5, 121–142.Google Scholar
  30. Said, E. Culture and Imperialism. London: Chatto & Windus, 1993.Google Scholar
  31. Schmid, Andre (1997), “Rediscovering Manchuria: Sin Ch’aeho and the Politics of Territorial History in Korea,” The Journal of Asian Studies, 56 (1), 26–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schultz-Engler, Frank. “Border Patrols: Postcolonialism and the Topography of Modernity,” in Postcolonial (Dis)Affections, eds. Walter Gõbel and Saskia Schabio. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier, 2007. 37–53.Google Scholar
  33. Shin, Gi-Wook, Ethnic Nationalism in Korea: Genealogy, Politics and Legacy. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
  34. Shin, Gi-Wook and Michael Robinson, eds. Colonial Modernity in Korea, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  35. Shin, Gi-Wook, James Freda and Gihong Yi (1999), “The Politics of Ethnic Nationalism in Divided Korea,” Nations and Nationalism 5 (4), 465–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tikhonov, Vladimir Modern Korea and Its Others: Perceptions of the Neighbouring Countries and Korean Modernity. London: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
  37. ———. Modern Korea. Social Darwinism and Nationalism in Korea: the Beginnings (1880s–1910s). ‘Survival’ as an Ideology of Korean Modernity. Leiden: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar
  38. ———. “Social Darwinism in Korea and its Influence on Early Modern Korean Buddhism,” footnote 7. http://koreanbuddhism.net/bbs/board.php?bo_table=5010&wr_id=17
  39. Taylor, Charles. “Two Theories of Modernity,” in Alternative Modernities, ed. Dillip P. Gaonkar. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2001. 172–196Google Scholar
  40. ———. “Two Theories of Modernity,” in Alternative Modernities, ed. Dillip P. Gaonkar. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, (1996), “A World Consensus on Human Rights?” Dissent, 15–21.Google Scholar
  41. Wallerstein, I. The Essential Wallerstein. New York: The New Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  42. Wallerstein, I. “Eurocentrism and its Avatars: The Dilemmas of Social Science.” 1–15. https://www.iwallerstein.com/wp-content/uploads/docs/NLREURAV.PDF

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul S. Chung
    • 1
  1. 1.Lutheran School of Theology at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations