Advertisement

Engineering Capstone Design Education: Current Practices, Emerging Trends, and Successful Strategies

  • Susannah HoweEmail author
  • Jay Goldberg
Chapter

Abstract

Capstone design courses play an important role in the preparation of engineering students for professional practice and career success. They allow students to apply what they have learned prior to their senior year along with newly developed skills relating to the solution of real-world design problems, often in a team environment with external clients. Team-based capstone design courses provide opportunities for students to develop teamwork and communication skills. In the United States, accredited engineering programs are required to offer a major design experience; most programs fulfill this requirement through a capstone design course. Differences in course learning outcomes, management, structure, duration, projects, student teams, and required deliverables exist among institutions. This chapter presents the current state of engineering capstone design education and highlights changes to capstone design practices in the U.S. over the past 25 years, based on extensive, seminal surveys of capstone design programs. It discusses current practices and successful strategies in engineering capstone design education. The chapter includes perspectives and feedback from hundreds of engineering capstone design faculty regarding their personal experiences with capstone design programs. This chapter also provides recommendations for supporting engineering capstone design experiences based on the authors’ vast experience teaching and managing capstone design courses and engaging with the capstone design community. These recommendations include scaffolding the design curriculum, fostering industry involvement in capstone design courses, keeping courses and faculty up-to-date with current design practices, obtaining organizational support for capstone design courses, sourcing capstone design projects, and preparing students for professional practice.

Keywords

Engineering capstone design Career preparation Design pedagogy Design projects Professional practice 

References

  1. ABET (2018) Criteria for accrediting engineering programs 2018–2019. http://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/E001-18-19-EAC-Criteria-11-29-17.pdf. Accessed 11 July 2018
  2. ASEE (2012) Innovation with impact: creating a culture for scholarly and systematic innovation in engineering education. American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Bright A, Phillips JR (1999) The Harvey Mudd engineering clinic: past, present, future. J Eng Educ 88(2):189–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. College Affordability Guide (2016) Degree prospects: course credit plus a paycheck. http://www.collegeaffordabilityguide.org/co-op-programs. Accessed 11 July 2018
  5. Dixon, D (2012) Experiencing capstone design problem statements. In: Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, San Antonio, TXGoogle Scholar
  6. Dixon, D (2014) Technical design reviews in capstone. In: Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, Indianapolis, INGoogle Scholar
  7. Goldberg J (2007) Capstone design courses: producing industry-ready biomedical engineers. Morgan and Claypool, Boulder COGoogle Scholar
  8. Goldberg J (2012a) Capstone design courses: part II: preparing biomedical engineers for the real world. Morgan and Claypool, Boulder COCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goldberg J (2012b) Learning to identify unmet needs and new product opportunities. Int J Eng Educ 28(2):349–354MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. Goldberg J (2014) Faculty internships for capstone design instructors: maintaining an up-to-date capstone design course. IEEE PulseGoogle Scholar
  11. Goldberg J (2016) Co-ops and capstone design: are they interchangeable? IEEE PulseGoogle Scholar
  12. Goldberg J, Cariapa V, Corliss G, Kaiser K (2014) Benefits of industry involvement in multidisciplinary capstone design courses. Int J Eng Educ 30(1):6–13Google Scholar
  13. Goldberg J, Howe S (2015) Virtual capstone design teams: preparing for global innovation. Int J Eng Educ 31(6B):1773–1779Google Scholar
  14. Goldberg J, Malassigne P (2017) Lessons learned from a 10-year collaboration between biomedical engineering and industrial design students in capstone design projects. Int J Eng Educ 33(5):1513–1520Google Scholar
  15. Hauhart R, Grahe J (2015) Designing and teaching undergraduate capstone courses. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  16. Howe S (2008) Focused follow-up to 2005 national survey. In: Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
  17. Howe S (2010) Where are we now: statistics on capstone courses nationwide. Adv Eng Educ 2(1):1–27Google Scholar
  18. Howe S (2015) Industry immersion: the impacts of a sabbatical deep-dive. In: Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education, Seattle, WAGoogle Scholar
  19. Howe S, Lasser R, Su K, Pedicini S (2009) Content in capstone design courses: pilot survey results from faculty, students, and industry. In: Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education, Austin, TXGoogle Scholar
  20. Howe S, Rosenbauer L (2017) Extending the 2015 capstone design survey: data from Australia and New Zealand. In: Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education, New Orleans, LAGoogle Scholar
  21. Howe S, Rosenbauer L, Poulos S (2017) The 2015 capstone design survey results: current practices and changes over time. Int J Eng Educ 33(5):1393–1421Google Scholar
  22. Layton R, Loughry M, Ohland M, Ricco G (2010) Design and validation of a web-based system for assigning members to teams using instructor-specified criteria. Adv Eng Educ 2(1):1–28Google Scholar
  23. Lulay K (2015) Implementation of a design spine for a mechanical engineering curriculum. In: Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education, Seattle, WAGoogle Scholar
  24. McKenzie, L, Trevisan M, Davis D, Beyerlein S (2004) Capstone design courses and assessment: a national study. In: Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education, Salt Lake City, UTGoogle Scholar
  25. Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y, Bernarda G, Smith A (2014) Value proposition handbook. Wiley, Hoboken, NJGoogle Scholar
  26. Pembridge J, Paretti M (2010) The current state of capstone design pedagogy. In: Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education, Louisville, KYGoogle Scholar
  27. Rao M, Hayes C, Lynch K (2015) Survey of mechanical engineering capstone design courses—summary of results. ASME International Mechanical Engineering Education Leadership Summit, Newport Beach, CAGoogle Scholar
  28. Silverstein D, Bullard L, Seider W, Vigeant M (2013) How we teach: capstone design. In: Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education, Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
  29. Todd R, Magleby S, Sorensen C, Swan B, Anthony D (1995) A survey of capstone engineering courses in North America. J Eng Educ 84(2):165–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Smith College, Picker Engineering ProgramNorthamptonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biomedical EngineeringMarquette University and the Medical College of WisconsinMilwaukeeUSA

Personalised recommendations