Advertisement

Artificial Creativity and Self-Evolution: Abductive Reasoning in Artificial Life Forms

  • James A. Crowder
  • John Carbone
  • Shelli Friess
Chapter

Abstract

What contributions can Cognitive Science offer to the understanding of nature of providing creativity to artificial life forms? For this discussion, it is necessary to investigate creative processes from a mechanistic perspective as well as involve subjective elements which cannot, in principle, be described from this perspective. These two basic approaches will be investigated here, focusing the artificial creative process on the nature of artificial abductive reasoning. As an initial hypothesis we will characterize creativity as a self-organizing process in which abductive reasoning occurs using self-organizing, semantic topical maps in conjunction with an abductive neural network, allowing the creation and expansion of a well-structured set of beliefs within the artificial system. This process is considered here as part of the establishment of order parameters in the flow of information available to allow artificial life forms to self-organize and infer on sensory information. In this sense, we will argue that a deeper understanding of how self-organizing processes involving abductive reasoning may take place in artificial dynamic systems, and how this can assist in the creation of an artificial creative process within an artificially intelligent artificial life form we refer to as a Synthetic, Evolving Life Form (SELF).

Here we present a self-evolving, abductive, hypothesis-based reasoning framework called the Advanced Learning Abductive Network (ALAN) that provides the ability to mimic human experience-based reasoning.

Keywords

Occam learning Occam abduction Artificial intelligence Machine learning Dialectic inference 

References

  1. 1.
    Taylor, J. M., & Raskin, V. (2010). Fuzzy ontology for natural language. In 29th International Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fodor, J. (1983). Modularity and the mind: An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Garcia, C. (2007). Cognitive modularity, biological modularity, and evolution. Biological Theory: Integrating Development, Evolution and Cognition, 2(1), 62–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gibbs, R., & Van Orden, G. (2010). Adaptive cognition without massive modularity. Journal of Language and Cognition, 2(2), 149–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hutchins, E., & Lintem, G. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rogers, Y. (1997). A brief introduction to distributed cognition. Brighton: University of Sussex Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    DeRaedt, L. (1992). Interactive theory revision: An inductive logic programming approach. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Roberts, S., & Tarassenko, L. (1994). A probabilistic resource allocating network for novelty detection. Neural Computation, 6, 270–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Newell, A. (2003). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nishimori, T., Nakamura, T., & Shiino, M. (1990). Retrieval of spatio-temporal sequences in asynchronous neural networks. Physical Review A, 41, 3346–3354.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cooper, G., & Herskovits, E. (1992). A Bayesian method for the induction of probabilistic networks from data. Machine Learning, 9, 309–347.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dimopoulos, Y., & Kakas, A. (1996). Abduction and inductive learning. In L. De Raedt (Ed.), Advances in inductive logic programming (pp. 144–171). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jones, B. (1999). Bounded rationality. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 297–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Crowder, J., & Friess, S. (2012). Artificial psychology: The psychology of AI. In Proceedings of the 3rd Annual International Multi-Conference on Informatics and Cybernetics, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bonarini, A. (1997). Anytime learning and adaptation of structured fuzzy behaviors. Adaptive behavior (Vol. 5). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Crowder, J. (2012). Possiblistic, abductive neural networks (PANNs) for decision support in autonomous systems: The advanced learning, abductive network (ALAN). In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Robotic Intelligence and Applications, Gwanju, Korea.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Crowder, J. (2010). Flexible object architectures for hybrid neural processing systems. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Las Vegas, NV.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Raskin, V., Taylor, J. M., & Hemplemann, C. F. (2010). Ausocial engineering. Concord, MA: New Security Paradigms Workshop.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hutchinson, J., Koch, C., Luo, J., & Mead, C. (1988). Computing motion using analog and binary resistive networks. Computer, 21(3), 52–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Crowder, J., & Carbone, J. (2011). Recombinant knowledge relativity threads for contextual knowledge storage. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Las Vegas, NV.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zadeh, L. (2004). A note of web intelligence, world knowledge, and fuzzy logic. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 50, 291–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • James A. Crowder
    • 1
  • John Carbone
    • 2
  • Shelli Friess
    • 3
  1. 1.Colorado Engineering Inc.Colorado SpringsUSA
  2. 2.ForcepointAustinUSA
  3. 3.Walden UniversityMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations