International and Transnational Consumer Law on Sustainable Consumption

  • Mateja DurovicEmail author
  • Franciszek Lech


This chapter examines the little-known area of the International and Transnational Consumer Law on sustainable consumption. Sustainable consumption, as such, has not attracted much academic consideration, despite the increasing prominence that environmental awareness and protection plays in international legislative and regulatory efforts. Nonetheless, most of the international efforts fail to effect an actual, direct encouragement of sustainable development. The fatal flaws of these efforts are mainly their non-binding nature and lack of sufficient consensus between the countries to compromise and impose more radical reform. Therefore, international consumer law on sustainable consumption is presently confined to the UN Guidelines on Consumer Protection and its precatory clauses.


International law UN guidelines on consumer protection Consumer law Sustainable consumption 


  1. Consejo Permanente De La Organización De Los Estados Americanos, Comisión De Asuntos Jurídicos y Politicos (2011) Selección De Temas Para Una Posible Octava Conferencia Especializada Interamericana Sobre Derecho Internacional Privado’, (29 November 2011) available at: Accessed 10 Feb 2019. (Permanent Council of OAS and Comission of Judicial and Political Affairs, ‘Selection of topics for a possible eighth specialized inter-American conference on International Private Law’)
  2. Consumers International (2016) Practical guide to the UN guidelines for consumer protection available at: Accessed 10 Feb 2019
  3. Delisle J, Trujillo E (2010) Consumer protection in transnational contexts. Am J Comp Law 58:135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Durovic M, Micklitz H-W (2017) Internationalisation of consumer law. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fernández Arroyo DP (2009) Current approaches towards harmonization of consumer private international law in the Americas. Int Comp Law Q 58(2):411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gawith D (2010) Model laws relevant to preparation for the international regulation of international consumer transactions. J Bus Law (6):474Google Scholar
  7. OECD (2000) Guidelines for consumer protection in the context of electronic commerce. Available at: Accessed 10 Feb 2019
  8. Organization of American States (n.d.) Historia del Proceso de las CIDIP’s’ (unknown date of publication), Accessed July 15. Available at:, see also for an English version. Accessed 10 Feb 2019
  9. Peterson E (1987) The case against ‘The Case Against the UN Guidelines for Consumer Protection’. J Consumer Policy 10:433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pinna A (2002) The protection of European Consumer: some aspects of private international law. Tilburg Foreign Law Rev 10:325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Protehro SD, Freund J, Kilbourne WE, Luchs MG, Ozanne LK, Thøgersen J (2011) Sustainable consumption: opportunities for consumer research and public policy. J Public Policy Market 30(1):31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Schroeder P, Anantharaman M (2017) Lifestyle leapfrogging in emerging economies: enabling systemic shifts to sustainable consumption. J Consumer Policy 40:3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. UN Guidelines on Consumer Protection reform in 1999 (UN Department for Economic and Social Affairs, at Accessed 10 Feb 2019
  14. Weidenbaum M (1987) The case against the UN guidelines for consumer protection. J Consumer Policy 10:425CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.King’s College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations