Advertisement

Fibre-Optic Transillumination: FOTI

  • Richard HoganEmail author
  • Iain A. Pretty
  • Roger P. Ellwood
Chapter

Abstract

Transillumination of teeth has been advocated for caries detection for over 100 years and requires minimal experience to implement in clinical practice. Fibre-optic light sources are readily available and when used appropriately, help to enhance the contrast between sound tooth tissue and caries lesions. To improve the validity of fibre-optic transillumination (FOTI), a scoring index is available to enable the combined assessment of lesions using ICDAS and FOTI.

Improvements in technology have spawned digital methods of capturing images of transilluminated teeth, permitting longitudinal assessment of lesion status via appraisal by the clinician. More recently, technologies employing near-infrared wavelengths of light have become commercially available and permit the capture of transillumination images less confounded by extrinsic staining and with increased penetration into the tooth structure.

Fibre-optic transillumination of teeth, both traditional and digital, is simple to employ in clinical practice, well tolerated by patients and offers a non-invasive and non-irradiating adjunct to visual detection. With increasing experience of their use, FOTI and DIFOTI can significantly enhance the clinician’s ability to detect caries lesions on all surfaces and of varying severity.

Keywords

FOTI Transillumination Near-infrared DIFOTI Caries detection 

References

  1. 1.
    Hume W. Need for change in dental caries diagnosis. In: Stookey G, editor. Early detection of dental caries: proceedings of the 1st annual Indiana conference. Indianapolis: Indiana University School of Dentistry; 1996. p. 1–10.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pine CM. Fibre-optic transillumination (FOTI) in caries diagnosis. In: Stookey G, editor. Early detection of dental caries: proceedings of the 1st annual Indiana conference. Indianapolis: Indiana University School of Dentistry; 1996. p. 51–65.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gomez J. Detection and diagnosis of the early caries lesion. BMC Oral Health. 2015;15(Suppl 1):S3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pretty IA. Caries detection and diagnosis: novel technologies. J Dent. 2006;34(10):727–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stephen KW, Russell JI, Creanor SL, Burchell CK. Comparison of fibre optic transillumination with clinical and radiographic caries diagnosis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1987;15(2):90–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Côrtes DF, Ellwood RP, Ekstrand KR. An in vitro comparison of a combined FOTI/visual examination of occlusal caries with other caries diagnostic methods and the effect of stain on their diagnostic performance. Caries Res. 2003;37:8–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davies GM, Worthington HV, Clarkson JE, Thomas P, Davies RM. The use of fibre-optic transillumination in general dental practice. Br Dent J. 2001;191(3):145–7. Nature Publishing Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gomez J, Tellez M, Pretty IA, Ellwood RP, Ismail AI. Non-cavitated carious lesions detection methods: a systematic review. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013;41(1):55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bader JD, Shugars DA, Bonito AJ. A systematic review of the performance of methods for identifying carious lesions. J Public Health Dent. 2002;62(4):201–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pretty IA, Ellwood RP. The caries continuum: opportunities to detect, treat and monitor the re-mineralization of early caries lesions. J Dent. 2013;41(Suppl 2):S12–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Neuhaus KW, Ellwood RP, Lussi A, Pitts NB. Traditional lesion detection aids. In: Pitts N, editor. Detection, assessment, diagnosis and monitoring of caries. Basel: Karger; 2009. p. 42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Strassler HE, Pitel ML. Using fiber-optic transillumination as a diagnostic aid in dental practice. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2014;35(2):80–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pretty IA, Maupomé G. A closer look at diagnosis in clinical dental practice: part 5. Emerging technologies. J Can Dent Assoc (Tor). 2004;70(8):540.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schneiderman A, Elbaum M, Shultz T, Keem S, Greenebaum M, Driller J. Assessment of dental caries with Digital Imaging Fiber-Optic TransIllumination (DIFOTI): in vitro study. Caries Res. 1997;31(2):103–10. Karger Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Astvaldsdóttir A, Ahlund K, Holbrook WP, de Verdier B, Tranæus S. Approximal caries detection by DIFOTI: in vitro comparison of diagnostic accuracy/efficacy with film and digital radiography. Int J Dent. 2012;2012:326401. Hindawi Publishing Corporation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Söchtig F, Hickel R, Kühnisch J. Caries detection and diagnostics with near-infrared light transillumination: clinical experiences. Quintessence Int (Berl). 2014;45(6):513–38.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kühnisch J, Söchtig F, Pitchika V, Laubender R, Neuhaus KW, Lussi A, et al. In vivo validation of near-infrared light transillumination for interproximal dentin caries detection. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20(4):821–9. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liewehr F. An inexpensive device for transillumination. J Endod. 2001;27(2):130–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    AdDent. Microlux device [Internet]. [cited 2 Aug 2017]. http://www.addent.com/microlux/.
  20. 20.
    Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989;13(3):319–40.  https://doi.org/10.2307/249008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Hogan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Iain A. Pretty
    • 1
  • Roger P. Ellwood
    • 1
  1. 1.Colgate-Palmolive Dental Health Unit, Division of DentistryThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations