Influence of Confluence Angle Between Inlets on the Mixing Performance of Micro-mixer with Obstacles

  • Bappa Mondal
  • Sukumar Pati
  • Promod Kumar Patowari
Conference paper


Numerical studies have been carried out to analyze the effect of confluence angle between two inlets on the mixing performance and pressure drop characteristics for flow in straight micro mixer with obstacles along the channel width. The comparison has also made with micro mixer without obstacle. The mixing efficiency and pressure drop are presented in terms of the confluence angle, Reynolds number (Re), and Schmidt number (Sc). It exposes that the mixing characteristics are altered significantly by changing the confluence angle. The mixing efficiency enhances with an increase in confluence angle between inlets, and the corresponding pressure drop also increases. The mixing efficiency and pressure both are higher for the micro mixer having obstacles compare to that of micro mixer without obstacle.


Micro mixer Confluence angle Obstacle Mixing efficiency Pressure drop 


  1. 1.
    Rashidi S, Bafekr H, Valipour MS, Esfahani JA (2018) A review on the application, simulation, and experiment of the electrokinetic mixers. Chem Eng Proc Intensif 126:108–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jeong GS, Chung S, Kim CB, Lee SH (2010) Applications of micromixing technology. Analyst 135:460–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ward K, Fan ZH (2015) Mixing in microfluidic devices and enhancement methods. J Micromech Microeng 25:94001–94017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jakeway SC, Mello AJD, Russell EL (2010) Miniaturized total analysis systems for biological analysis. Fresenius J Anal Chem 366:525–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li T, Chen X (2017) Numerical investigation of 3D novel chaotic micromixers with obstacles. Int J Heat Mass Transf 115:278–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cosentino A, Madadi H, Vergara P, Vecchione R, Causa F, Netti PA (2015) An efficient planar accordion-shaped micromixer: from biochemical mixing to biological application. Sci Rep 5:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dey R, Kar S, Joshi S, Maiti TK, Chakraborty S (2015) Ultra-low-cost ‘paper-and-pencil’ device for electrically controlled micromixing of analytes. Microfluid Nanofluid 19(2):375–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Das SS, Patowari PK (2018) Fabrication of serpentine micro-channels on the glass by ultrasonic machining using developed micro-tool by wire-cut electric discharge machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95:3013–3028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sarma P, Patowari PK (2016) Design and analysis of passive Y-type micromixers for enhanced mixing performance for biomedical and microreactor application. J Adv Manuf Syst 15:161–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Das SS, Patawari BK, Patowari PK, Halder S (2014) Computational analysis for mixing of fluids flowing through micro-channels of different geometries. 5th international & 26th all India manufacturing technology, design, and research conference (AIMTDR 2014), India, 236, pp. 1–6Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang L, Wu W, Li X (2013) Numerical and experimental investigation of mixing characteristics in the constructal tree-shaped microchannel. Int J Heat Mass Transf 67:1014–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mondal B, Mehta SK, Patowari PK, Pati S (2019) Numerical study of mixing in wavy micromixers: comparison between raccoon and serpentine mixer, Chemical Engineering & Processing: Process Intensification 136:44–61Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Das SS, Tilekar SD, Wangikar SS, Patowari PK (2017) A numerical and experimental study of passive fluids mixing in micro-channels of different configurations. Microsyst Technol 23:5977–5988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wangikar SS, Patowari PK, Misra RD (2018) Numerical and experimental investigations on the performance of a serpentine microchannel with semicircular obstacles. Microsyst Technol 24:3307–3320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Borgohain P, Dalal A, Natarajan G, Gadgil HP (2018) Numerical assessment of mixing performances in cross-T microchannel with curved ribs. Microsyst Technol 24:1–15 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wangikar SS, Patowari PK, Misra RD (2017) Effect of process parameters and optimization for photochemical machining of brass and German silver. Mater Manuf Process 32(15):1747–1755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wangikar SS, Patowari PK, Misra RD (2018) Parametric optimization for photochemical machining of copper using overall evaluation criteria. Mater Today Proc 5(2):4736–4742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wangikar SS, Patowari PK, Misra RD (2016) Parametric optimization for photochemical machining of copper using grey relational method. In: Techno-societal 2016, international conference on advanced technologies for societal applications, December. Springer, Cham, pp 933–943Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wangikar SS, Patowari PK, Misra RD, Misal ND (2019) Photochemical machining: a less explored non-conventional machining process. In: Non-conventional machining in modern manufacturing systems. IGI Global, Hershey, pp 188–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pati S (2012) A textbook on fluid mechanics and hydraulic machines. McGraw-Hill Education (India) Pvt. Ltd, New DelhiGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bappa Mondal
    • 1
  • Sukumar Pati
    • 1
  • Promod Kumar Patowari
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational Institute of Technology SilcharSilcharIndia

Personalised recommendations