Groundlessness in the Tractatus

  • Maria Balaska


In this chapter I approach Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus as a story about the groundlessness of meaning. More specifically, I discuss how the Tractatus addresses the temptation to avoid the groundlessness of meaning through the idea that meaning can be grounded a priori, before experience, either on objects as empty conditions of sense or on logical syntax. I argue that Wittgenstein’s work offers, instead, an anti-aprioristic view on how signification works that leaves meaning to the use of language and to the application (Anwendung) of logic.


  1. Anscombe, G. E. M. (1971). Introduction to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  2. Baltas, A. (2012). Peeling Potatoes or Grinding Lenses: Spinoza and Young Wittgenstein Converse on Immanence and Its Logic. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradley, R. (1992). The Nature of all Being: A Study of Wittgenstein’s Modal Atomism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Carnap, R. (1937). The Logical Syntax of Language (A. Smeaton, Trans.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Conant, J. (1998). Wittgenstein on Meaning and Use. Philosophical Investigations, 21(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Conant, J. (2000). Elucidation and Nonsense in Frege and Early Wittgenstein. In A. Crary & R. Read (Eds.), The New Wittgenstein. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Floyd, J. (1998). The Uncaptive Eye: Solipsism in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. In L. Rouner (Ed.), Loneliness. Notre Dame: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Religion.Google Scholar
  8. Frege, G. (1997). The Frege Reader (M. Beaney, Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. Friedlander, E. (2001). Signs of Sense: Reading Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. Cambridge & London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hacker, P. M. S. (1986). Insight and Illusion: Themes in the Philosophy of Wittgenstein. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hylton, P. (2005). Propositions, Function, and Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ishiguro, H. (1969). Use and Reference of Names. In P. Winch (Ed.), Studies in the Philosophy of Wittgenstein (pp. 20–50). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  13. Kenny, A. (1976). Wittgenstein. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  14. Livingston, P. (2004). ‘Meaning Is Use’ in the Tractatus. Philosophical Investigations, 27(1), 34–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Malcolm, N. (1988). Wittgenstein: Nothing Is Hidden. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. McDonough, R. (1986). The Argument of the Tractatus. Its Relevance to Contemporary Theories of Logic, Language, Mind, and Philosophical Truth. SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  17. Mounce, H. O. (1981). Wittgenstein’s Tractatus: An Introduction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Ostrow, M. B. (2002). Wittgenstein’s Tractatus: A dialectical interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Pears, D. F. (1987). The False Prison (Vol. I). Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Russell, B. (1918). Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description (1911). In Mysticism and Logic and Other Essays (pp. 152–167). London: Longmans.Google Scholar
  21. Russell, B. (1964). Lectures on Logical Atomism. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  22. Russell, B. (1984). Theory of Knowledge: The 1913 Manuscript. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Wittgenstein, L. (1974). Letters to Russell, Keynes and Moore (G. H. von Wright & B. F. McGuinness, Eds.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  24. Wittgenstein, L. (1979). Notebooks, 1914–1916 (G. H. von Wright & G. E. M. Anscombe, Eds. and G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  25. Wittgenstein, L. (1980). Wittgenstein’s Lectures, Cambridge, 1930–32 (D. Lee, Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  26. Wittgenstein, L. (1986). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (C. K. Ogden, Trans.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  27. Wittgenstein, L. (1992). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness, Trans.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Balaska
    • 1
  1. 1.University of HertfordshireHertfordshireUK

Personalised recommendations