Structural Performance Assessment of Offshore Wind Turbine Jackets-a Comparative Study Under Dynamic Loading Environment

  • Ravindra DesaiEmail author
  • Krishna Makwana
  • Sandeep Potnis
Conference paper


This work has focused on investigating the comparative performance of the conventional type of offshore jacket substructure and a modified twisted-tripod jacket type (MTJ) under static and dynamic loading environment. Conventional four-legged and four number of MTJ structures, with a finite number of leg twisting angles from 0° to 90°, for supporting 5 MW NREL wind turbine were analysed for a selected site. In order to compare performance under dynamic loading, the dimensions of the structures were designed iteratively using static stress analysis to ensure that all structures had a similar level of load-carrying capability. Static analyses were performed using SACS v8 and models were imported to SAP-2000 for dynamic response spectrum analyses. The results obtained here reveal that, in addition to savings in material costs, the modified twisted-tripod jacket performs more efficiently than conventional four-legged jackets. This study has established a framework of procedure for simplified analysis of wind turbine jackets under dynamic loading environment.


Offshore wind turbine Static analysis Dynamic analysis Twisted jackets (MTJ-structures) JONSWAP wave spectra Twist angle 



Authors wish to greatly acknowledge the Management of Walchand College of Engineering Sangli for supporting this research through TEQIP-III.


  1. 1.
    Karadeniz H (1999) Spectral analysis of offshore structures under combined wave and earthquake loadings. In: 9th international offshore and polar engineering conference, 4, 30 May–4 June, Brest, France, pp 1098–6189Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Karadeniz H (2013) Stochastic analysis of offshore steel structures. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    API RP 2A WSD (2007) Recommended practice for planning, designing and constructing fixed offshore platforms – working stress designGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ashish CB, Selvam P (2013) Static and dynamic analysis of jacket substructure for offshore fixed wind turbines. APCWE-VIIIGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    DNV-OS-C101(2011) Design of offshore steel Structures, General (LRFD Method), Offshore Standard, Det Norske VeritasGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wenhua W, Xin L (2014) Analysis of an offshore wind turbine subjected to earthquakes. ACEM14Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhang L, Xin L (2017) Dynamic analysis of a 5-MW tripod offshore wind turbine by considering fluid–structure interaction. China Ocean Eng 31(5):559–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hung YC, Chang YY, Che SY (2017) Natural frequency and vibration analysis of jacket type foundation for offshore wind power. Mater Sci Eng 276:12–12Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wei K, Myers AT, Arwade SR (2017) Dynamic effects in the response of offshore wind turbines supported by jackets under wave loading. Eng Str 142:36–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen IW, Wong BL, Lin YH, Chau SW, Huang HH (2016) Design and analysis of jacket substructures for offshore wind turbines. Energies 9:264–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Watsamon S, Nguyen H, Sari A (2016) An improved methodology on design and analysis of offshore wind turbines supported by monopiles. In: Offshore technology conference, 2–5 May, Houston, Texas, USAGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lin CY, Lin JH, Chu TL, Huang CC (2016) Structural analysis for jacket type support structure of offshore wind turbine under local environmental conditions intaiwan. In: 26th international ocean and polar engineering conference, 26 June–2 July, Rhodes, GreeceGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Josea NM, Mathaib A (2016) A study on lateral deformation of mono-pile of offshore wind turbine due to environmental loads. Procedia Technology 24:287–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Abhinav KA, Saha N (2015) Dynamic analysis of an offshore wind turbine including soil effects. Procedia Eng 116:32–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jonkman J, Butterfield S, Musial, W, Scott G (2009) Definition of a 5-MW reference wind turbine for offshore system development. NREL/TP-500-38060Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    IEC 61400-1.(2005) Wind Turbines –Part 1: Design requirements. International Electro Technical CommissionGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    IEC 61400-3.(2009) Wind turbines –Part 3: design requirements for offshore wind turbines. International Electro Technical CommissionGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    BIS IS 1893–1 (2016) Criteria for earthquake resistant Design of Structures-General provisions and buildingsGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    BIS IS 1893–4 (2005) Criteria for earthquake resistant Design of Structures-Stack like structuresGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Det Norske Veritas—Germanischer Lloyd (DNV GL) (2010) Recommended practice DNV-RP-C201—environmental conditions and environmental loads. DNV GL: Hovik, NorwayGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ravindra Desai
    • 1
    Email author
  • Krishna Makwana
    • 2
  • Sandeep Potnis
    • 2
  1. 1.Walchand College of EngineeringSangliIndia
  2. 2.MIT World Peace UniversityPuneIndia

Personalised recommendations