Advertisement

Small Capacity Plant for Post-harvest Process of Mango – Worth to Indian Farmer

  • N. K. Durge
  • S. S. Mantha
  • V. M. Phalle
Conference paper

Abstract

There are many varieties of fruit; Mango is one of the most favorite subtropical and tropical fruits in the world. It is famous for its flavour and taste. It can be processed and preserved in different forms like pulp, juice, pallets etc. In India, Mango is known as the king of fruits on account of its nutritive value, taste, and fragrance. India is one of the biggest producers of mango in the world in terms of quantity as well as quality. Unfortunately, about, 25–30% of this precious fruit is wasted due to traditional post-harvest practices like packaging, grading, storage etc. This wastage can be reduced to some extent through the correct scientific and technical approach. India has good quality rich and fertile land. However, this fertile land is divided into small orchards like 1 ha, 2 ha etc. Mango is cultivated in almost all states in India and most of the mango orchards have small land holding capacity. Thus, Mango production is also limited. Alphonso mango produced in the Konkan region of the state of Maharashtra has global demand.

It is essential to perform various post-harvesting processes like de-sapping, cleaning, washing, hot water treatment, sorting, grading, packing etc. to improve quality, as well as the shelf life of mango. An ordinary Mango processing plant takes large space and its installation cost is high. So it is necessary to design a small processing plant which is economical for small scale producers.

The central idea of this paper is to present a design of a small capacity mango processing plant which can be affordable to small farmer. It will help to improve quality of mangoes and reduce post-harvest losses. In India approximate yield of mango per hectare is 5–8 tons. If the producer can process the mangoes on farm itself, farmer can directly sell the mangoes to end customer. The need of middleman will be eliminated and the concept of Farm to Home will be implemented.

Keywords

Small capacity process plant Mango marketing chain Post-harvest process Marketing efficiency India’s position in world agriculture 

References

  1. 1.
    Satyanjai Yadav, Assistant Agricultural Marketing Adviser under overall guidance of Shri Rakesh Saxena, Dy. Agricultural Marketing Adviser, D.M.I., B.H.O., Nagpur. “Post-Harvest Profile of Mango” Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture, (Department of Agriculture & Cooperation) Directorate of Marketing & Inspection, Nagpur (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sivakumar D, Jiang Y, Yahia EM (2011) Maintaining mango (Mangifera indica L.) fruit quality during the export chain. Food Res Int 44:1254–1263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baloch MK, Bibi F, Jilani MS (2011) Quality and shelf life of mango (Mangifera indica L.) fruit: as affected by cooling at harvest time. Sci Hortic 130:642–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hegde RN, Madhuri NV. A study on marketing infrastructure for fruits and vegetables in India. National institute of rural development (Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India), HyderabadGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Horticulture Statistics Division Department of Agriculture, Cooperation & Farmers Welfare (2015) Horticultural statistics at a glance 2015. Horticulture Statistics Division Department of Agriculture, Cooperation & Farmers Welfare Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare Government of IndiaGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Singh AK (2015) Managing Director National Horticulture Board Database-2014, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of IndiaGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Chidley HG, Kulkarni RS, Pujari KH, Giri AP, Gupta VS (2013) Spatial and temporal changes in the volatile profile of Alphonso mango upon exogenous ethylene treatment. Food Chem 136:585–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hand book on horticulture statistics – 2014 (2015) Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Badatya KC (2007) Mango in Andhra Pradesh – a commodity specific study. National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development, HyderabadGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jacobi KK, Wonga LS, Giles JE (1995) Effect of fruit maturity on quality and physiology of high-humidity hot air-treated ‘Kensington’ mango (Mangifera indica Linn.). Postharvest Biol Technol 5:149–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Banerjee GD (2011) Economics of mango cultivation. Department of Economic Analysis and Research, National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development, MumbaiGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zaharah SS, Singh Z (2011) Postharvest nitric oxide fumigation alleviates chilling injury, delays fruit ripening and maintains quality in cold-stored ‘Kensington Pride’ mango. Postharvest Biol Technol 60:202–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kienzlea S, Sruamsirib P, Carlea R, Sirisakulwat S (2011) Harvest maturity specification for mango fruit (Mangifera indica L. ‘Chok Anan’) in regard to long supply chains. Postharvest Biol Technol 61:41–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brecht JK (2010) Mango post-harvest best management practices manual. The National Mango Board (NMB), U.S. Department of Agriculture, University of Florida, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jacobi KK, MacRae EA, Hetherington SE (2000) Effects of hot air conditioning of ‘Kensington’ mango fruit on the response to hot water treatment. Postharvest Biol Technol 21:39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. K. Durge
    • 1
  • S. S. Mantha
    • 1
  • V. M. Phalle
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringVJTIMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations