Misfire Detection of Automotive Engines with Convolutional Neural Network

  • Ganesh Bhadane
  • Akshay A. JadhavEmail author
  • Vijay S. Bhong
  • Sujit A. Inamdar
  • Dhanaji P. Narsale
Conference paper


Misfiring in multi-cylinder is caused due to abnormal combustion of the engine. Cylinders produce less power if engine misfires. Engine misfires generate unburned hydrocarbons and increase the load on the catalytic converter. The job of the catalytic converter is to convert harmful pollutants into less harmful emissions before they ever leave the vehicle exhaust system. If the misfire rate is excessive, the catalytic converter can overheat and be damaged. Hence engine misfire becomes a severe issue and should be detected in early stages. During misfire and at normal combustion, every cylinder has its own unique vibration spectrum this will be a very useful phenomenon for misfire detection. In this work, vibration signals are recorded using a piezoelectric accelerometer for normal combustion as well as combustion with a misfire for each cylinder. The obtained vibration signals are used for training and testing of conventional machine learning algorithm as well as the deep learning algorithm. Support Vector Machine (SVM) with statistical feature extraction as conventional machine learning algorithm and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) as deep learning algorithm are used for misfire detection in multi-cylinder. In this paper, the evaluation parameters of classifiers such as overall accuracy, precision, recall etc. are compared. Deep learning algorithm i.e. CNN without feature Extraction was found to be performing better for multiclass misfire detection compared to CNN with feature extraction and SVM.


Misfire Catalytic converter Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) Accelerometer Vibration signal Feature extraction 


  1. 1.
    Jardine AS, Lin D, Banjevic D (2006) A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mech Syst Signal Process 20(7):1483–1510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eriksson L (1999) Spark advance modeling and control. Dissertations No. 580. Linkoping UniversityGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ji N-N, Zhang J-S, Zhang C-X (2014) A sparse-response deep belief network based on rate distortion theory. Pattern Recogn 47(9):31793191Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leng B, Zhang X, Yao M, Xiong Z (2015) A 3D model recognition mechanism based on deep Boltzmann machines. Neurocomputing 151:593602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Babu AK, Antony Aroul Raj V, Kumarsan G (2016) Misfire detection in a multi-cylinder diesel engine: a machine learn-ing approach. J Eng Sci Technol 11(2):278–295Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Steinke AW, Yang BS (2007) Support vector machine in machine condition monitoring and fault diagnosis. Mech Syst Signal Process 21(6):2560–2574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bengio Y (2009) Learning deep architectures for AI. Found Trends in Mach Learn 2(1):127MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Babu Devasenapati S, Ramachandran KI, Sugumaran V (2010) Misfire detection in a spark ignition engine using support vector machines. Int J Comput Appl 5(6):0975–8887Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ganesh Bhadane
    • 1
  • Akshay A. Jadhav
    • 2
    Email author
  • Vijay S. Bhong
    • 2
  • Sujit A. Inamdar
    • 2
  • Dhanaji P. Narsale
    • 2
  1. 1.Dr. D.Y.Patil College of Engineering Ambi TalegaonPuneIndia
  2. 2.SVERI’s College of EngineeringPandharpurIndia

Personalised recommendations