Advertisement

Case Study 3: Religious Rituals

  • Julia Ipgrave
Chapter

Abstract

Among interreligious activities, religious rituals are some of the most controversial and problematic. Religious rituals are often viewed as the performance of beliefs acted out before the believer’s god, and so issues of integrity and fidelity come into sharp focus. Among the interreligious actors in this research some held theologies that were amenable to interreligious worship, others held theologies that were not. This was found to be an area of mutual misunderstanding. This case study reports examples of different approaches to ritual worship in a religiously plural context with varying degrees of acceptability to participants: being an observer at someone else’s worship; performing parallel or sequential acts of worship; differentiation of engagement within worship; adaptation of worship to sensibilities of ‘other’ faiths; incorporation into ‘the other’s’ worship; interreligious rituals. While interreligious worship entails risks, many participants were aware of powerful social (rather than theological) reasons for engagement as signs of friendship and solidarity. In contexts where social and theological reasons conflicted the concept of intention became important. D’Costa’s distinction between intentions of ‘head’, ‘heart’ and ‘action’ is used to classify the positions of those who did participate in religious rituals as part of their interreligious engagement.

Keywords

Religious rituals Interreligious worship Integrity Intention 

References

  1. Baumann, Gerd. 2004. Grammars of Identity/Altereity. In Grammars of Identity/Altereity: A Structural Approach, ed. Gerd Baumann and Andre Gringrich, 18–50. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  2. CTBI. 2000. Christian Parameters of Multi-Faith Worship for Churches Together. http://www.ctbiarchive.org/pdf_view.php?id=93. Last accessed 25 Aug 2015.
  3. D’Costa, G. 2000. The Meeting of Religions and the Trinity. Maryknoll: Orbis Books.Google Scholar
  4. Hick, John. 1989. An Interpretation of Religion. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ohrt, Anna, and Mehmet Kalender. 2018. Interreligious Practice in Hamburg. A Mapping of Motivations, Conditions, Potential Benefits and Limitations from a Participant’s Perspective. In Religion and Dialogue in the City. Case Studies on Interreligious Encounter in Urban Community and Education, ed. J. Ipgrave, T. Knauth, A. Körs, D. Vieregge, and M.V.D. Lippe, 55–64. Münster: Waxmann Verlag.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julia Ipgrave
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of HumanitiesUniversity of RoehamptonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations