An Effective Approach for Party Recommendation in Voting Advice Application

  • Sharanya NagarjanEmail author
  • Anuj Mohamed
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 939)


When it comes to the current political scenario the large number of political parties put voters, especially first time voters, women, youngsters etc., in confusing state regarding whom to vote for. To solve this issue of, Voting Advice Applications (VAAs) which are questionnaire based recommender systems are used. VAAs are online tools that suggest the user with the most suitable party based on answers to the policy based questions. Even though this is an active area of research in the western political scenario, the performance of the existing algorithms are not very appreciable. Also the existing works have not imparted the human decision making behavior in developing algorithms. This research work aims in proposing novel approaches based on the human decision making which can efficiently suggest suitable parties for the voters. Soft set and Fuzzy Soft Set are techniques that are found to be good in modeling human decision making as it supports parameterization and vagueness. The proposed work uses these techniques to develop algorithms that can effectively suggest the voter with a suitable party. The research is carried out in the domain of political scenario in Kerala, where this is the first research in the area of VAAs. The developed algorithms were evaluated on a data set collected from various parts of the state and found promising.


Voting Advice Application Soft set Fuzzy soft set 



The authors acknowledge the support extended by DST-PURSE (Phase II), Government of India.


  1. 1.
    Isinkaye, F.O., Folajimi, Y.O., Ojokoh, B.A.: Recommendation systems: principles, methods and evaluation. Egypt. Inform. J. 3(16), 261–273 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Agathokleous, M., Tsapatsoulis, N.: Applying hidden Markov models to voting advice applications. EPJ Data Sci. 5, 34 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pajala, T., Korhonen, P., Malo, P., Sinha, A., Wallenius, J., Dehnokhalaji, A.: Accounting for political opinions, power, and influence: a voting advice application. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 266(2), 702–715 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Katakis, I., Tsapatsoulis, N., Mendez, F., Triga, V., Djouvas, C.: Social voting advice applications -definitions, challenges, datasets. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 44, 1039–1052 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gemenis, K., Rosema, M.: Voting advice applications and electoral turnout. Electoral. Stud. 36, 281–289 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Germann, M., Mendez, F., Wheatley, J., Serdült, U.: Spatial maps in voting advice applications: the case for dynamic scale validation. Acta Polit. 50, 214–238 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thomas, F., Joel, A.: What’s the point of voting advice applications? Competing perspectives on democracy and citizenship. Electoral. Stud. 36, 244–251 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Louwerse, T., Rosema, M.: The design effects of voting advice applications: comparing methods of calculating matches. Acta Politcia 2(50), 214–238 (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yuksel, S., Dizmanr, T., Yildizdan, G., Sert, U.: Application of soft sets to diagnose the prostate cancer risk. J. Inequalities Appl. 2013, 229 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yuen, K.K.F.: The fuzzy cognitive pairwise comparisons for ranking and grade clustering to build a recommender system. An application of smartphone recommendation. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 61, 136–151 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Maji, P.K., Biswas, R., Roy, A.R.: An application of soft sets in a decision making problem. Comput. Math Appl. 44(8–9), 1077–1083 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kumar, S.U., Inbarani, H.H., Kumar, S.S.: Bijective soft set based classification of medical data. In: 2013 International Conference on Pattern Recognition Informatics and Medical Engineering (PRIME), pp. 517–521 (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Handaga, B., Herawan, T., Deris, M.M.: FSSC: an algorithm for classifying numerical data using fuzzy soft set theory. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. Appl. 2, 29–46 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zenebe, A., Norcio, A.F.: Fuzzy modeling for item recommender systems or a fuzzy theoretic method for recommender systems (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Thong, N., Son, L.: HIFCF: an effective hybrid model between picture fuzzy clustering and intuitionistic fuzzy recommender systems for medical diagnosis. Expert Syst. Appl. 42, 3682–3701 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computer SciencesMahatma Gandhi UniversityKottayamIndia

Personalised recommendations