Advertisement

Bunge is Correct About Positivism, but less so about Marxism and Hermeneutics

  • Alberto Cupani

Abstract

Bunge is critical of three traditional philosophical trends: Positivism, Marxism and Hermeneutics. In relation to the first, he disapproves of its empiricisms, its nominalism and its phenomenalism, as well as its rejection of traditional ontological and axiological questions. In Marxism, Bunge mainly criticizes the ambitions of Dialectics and the thesis that ideas are socially determined. In relation to Hermeneutics, Bunge is convinced that it is radically failured for confusing the knowledge of social events with the interpretation of texts. In this article I show that although Bunge’s criticisms of Positivism are fair, his judgement of the two other doctrines is not totally so.

References

  1. Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966/1972). La Construcción Social de la Realidad (The Social Construction of Reality, 1966). Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.Google Scholar
  2. Bleicher, J. (1990/1980). Contemporary hermeneutics. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Bunge, M. (1979). Treatise on basic philosophy, tomo 4: Ontology II: A world of systems. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bunge, M. (1980). Epistemologia (Epistemología, 1980). São Paulo: Queiros-Edusp.Google Scholar
  5. Bunge, M. (1983). Treatise on basic philosophy, v. 5: Exploring the world. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  6. Bunge, M. (1985). Seudociencia e Ideología. Madrid: Alianza.Google Scholar
  7. Bunge, M. (1987). Vistas y Entrevistas. Buenos Aires: Siglo Veinte.Google Scholar
  8. Bunge, M. (1995). Sistemas Sociales y Filosofía. Buenos Aires: Sudamericana.Google Scholar
  9. Bunge, M. (1996). Finding philosophy in social science. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cupani, A. (1985). A crítica do Positivismo e o futuro da Filosofia. Florianópolis: Ed. da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brasil.Google Scholar
  11. Cupani, A. (1986). A Hermenêutica ante o Positivismo. Manuscrito (Brazil), IX(1), 75–100.Google Scholar
  12. Cupani, A. (1991). A filosofia da ciência de Mario Bunge e a questão do «positivismo». Manuscrito (Brazil), XIV(2), 113–142.Google Scholar
  13. Cupani, A. (2000). Realismo científico: el desafío de la sociología de la ciencia. Revista Adef (Buenos Aires), XV(1), 29–40.Google Scholar
  14. Dallmayr, F. R., & MacCarthy, T. (Eds.). (1977). Understanding and social inquiry. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  15. Dartigues, A. (1973). O que é a Fenomenologia? (Qu’est-ce que la phénomenologie?, 1973). Rio de Janeiro: Livraria Eldorado Tijuca Ltda.Google Scholar
  16. Giedymin, J. (1975). Antipositivism in contemporary philosophy of social sciences and humanities. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 26, 275–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
  18. Heelan, P. (1983). Natural science as a hermeneutic of instrumentation. Philosophy of Science, 50, 181–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heidegger, M. (1967, orig. 1927). Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
  20. Husserl, E. (1962). Ideas relativas a una fenomenología pura y una filosofía fenomenológica (Ideen…, 1913). México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
  21. Kolakowski, L. (1981). La Filosofía Positivista (Panstwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1966). Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
  22. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1977). A ideologia alemã (Die deutsche Ideologie, 1973). São Paulo: Grijalbo.Google Scholar
  23. Schutz, A. (1972). Fenomenología del Mundo Social (Der sinnhafte Aufbau der sozialen Welt, 1932). Buenos Aires: Paidós.Google Scholar
  24. Stockmann, N. (1983). Antipositivist theories of the sciences. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Winch, P. (1958). The idea of a social science and its relation to philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alberto Cupani
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyFederal University at Santa CatarinaFlorianópolisBrazil

Personalised recommendations