Misbehavior Detection in C-ITS Using Deep Learning Approach

  • Pranav Kumar SinghEmail author
  • Manish Kumar Dash
  • Paritosh Mittal
  • Sunit Kumar Nandi
  • Sukumar Nandi
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 940)


Cooperative Intelligent Transportation Systems (C-ITS) is one of the most prominent solutions to facilitate many new exciting applications concerning road safety, mobility, environment, and driving comfort. This technology is now on the verge of actual deployments. However, security threats, privacy, and trust management remain the most significant concerns. C-ITS relies highly on node cooperation and trust as vehicles take the decision based on the information received from the roadside network infrastructure. This information should be accurate and reliable to ensure proper functioning of the system. However, the presence of a misbehaving or compromised node in the system can lead to catastrophic results for both safety and traffic efficiency. It is therefore essential to detect misbehavior and defend the C-ITS against it. Although various studies have proposed misbehavior detection at the vehicular plane, the study that explores the machine learning capabilities to detect misbehavior at infrastructure plane is not present. Thus, in this paper, we propose a solution to detect misbehavior at the infrastructure plane of C-ITS that employs the predictive capabilities of Deep Learning. We compare the performance of Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) models of Deep Neural Network.


  1. 1.
    Hsiao, H.C., Studer, A., Dubey, R., Shi, E., Perrig, A.: Efficient and secure threshold-based event validation for VANETs. In: Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Conference on Wireless Network Security, pp. 163–174. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rawat, D.B., Bista, B.B., Yan, G., Weigle, M.C.: Securing vehicular ad-hoc networks against malicious drivers: a probabilistic approach. In: International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems (CISIS), pp. 146–151. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Leinmüller, T., Schmidt, R.K., Held, A.: Cooperative position verification-defending against roadside attackers 2.0. In: Proceedings of 17th ITS World Congress, pp. 1–8 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhuo, X., Hao, J., Liu, D., Dai, Y.: Removal of misbehaving insiders in anonymous VANETs. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems, pp. 106–115. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bilogrevic, I., Manshaei, M.H., Raya, M., Hubaux, J.P.: Optimal revocations in ephemeral networks: a game-theoretic framework. In: 8th International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc and Wireless Networks (WiOpt), pp. 21–30. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stubing, H., Jaeger, A., Schmidt, C., Huss, S.A.: Verifying mobility data under privacy considerations in Car-to-X communication. In: 17th ITS World CongressITS JapanITS AmericaERTICO (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stübing, H., Firl, J., Huss, S.A.: A two-stage verification process for Car-to-X mobility data based on path prediction and probabilistic maneuver recognition. In: Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC), pp. 17–24. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grover, J., Laxmi, V., Gaur, M.S.: Misbehavior detection based on ensemble learning in VANET. In: International Conference on Advanced Computing, Networking and Security, pp. 602–611. Springer (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grover, J., Prajapati, N.K., Laxmi, V., Gaur, M.S.: Machine learning approach for multiple misbehavior detection in VANET. In: International Conference on Advances in Computing and Communications, pp. 644–653. Springer (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    van der Heijden, R.W., Dietzel, S., Leinmüller, T., Kargl, F.: Survey on misbehavior detection in cooperative intelligent transportation systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.06810 (2016)
  11. 11.
    Khan, U., Agrawal, S., Silakari, S.: A detailed survey on misbehavior node detection techniques in vehicular ad hoc networks. In: Information Systems Design and Intelligent Applications, pp. 11–19. Springer (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hamieh, A., Ben-Othman, J., Mokdad, L.: Detection of radio interference attacks in VANET. In: Global Telecommunications Conference, GLOBECOM 2009, pp. 1–5. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Studer, A., Luk, M., Perrig, A.: Efficient mechanisms to provide convoy member and vehicle sequence authentication in VANETs. In: Third International Conference on Security and Privacy in Communications Networks and the Workshops, pp. 422–432. IEEE (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Golle, P., Greene, D., Staddon, J.: Detecting and correcting malicious data in VANETs. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks, pp. 29–37. ACM (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ghosh, M., Varghese, A., Gupta, A., Kherani, A.A., Muthaiah, S.N.: Detecting misbehaviors in VANET with integrated root-cause analysis. Ad Hoc Netw. 8(7), 778–790 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vulimiri, A., Gupta, A., Roy, P., Muthaiah, S.N., Kherani, A.A.: Application of secondary information for misbehavior detection in VANETs. In: International Conference on Research in Networking, pp. 385–396. Springer (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Loukas, G., Vuong, T., Heartfield, R., Sakellari, G., Yoon, Y., Gan, D.: Cloud-based cyber-physical intrusion detection for vehicles using deep learning. IEEE Access 6, 3491–3508 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hasrouny, H., Samhat, A.E., Bassil, C., Laouiti, A.: Vanet security challenges and solutions: a survey. Veh. Commun. 7, 7–20 (2017)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brecht, B., Therriault, D., Weimerskirch, A., Whyte, W., Kumar, V., Hehn, T., Goudy, R.: A security credential management system for V2X communications. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 99, 1–22 (2018)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hornik, K.: Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks. Neural Netw. 4(2), 251–257 (1991)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Olah, C.: Understanding LSTM networks. GITHUB blog (2015)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Behrisch, M., Bieker, L., Erdmann, J., Krajzewicz, D.: Sumo-simulation of urban mobility: an overview. In: The Third International Conference on Advances in System Simulation. ThinkMind (2011)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liang, X., Du, X., Wang, G., Han, Z.: Deep reinforcement learning for traffic light control in vehicular networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.11115 (2018)

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pranav Kumar Singh
    • 1
    Email author
  • Manish Kumar Dash
    • 1
  • Paritosh Mittal
    • 1
  • Sunit Kumar Nandi
    • 1
  • Sukumar Nandi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringIndian Institute of TechnologyGuwahatiIndia

Personalised recommendations