Advertisement

Mobility Aware Routing Protocol Based on DIO Message for Low Power and Lossy Networks

  • Shridhar SanshiEmail author
  • C. D. Jaidhar
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 940)

Abstract

Mobility support has become a crucial requirement for many of the Low power and Lossy Networks applications, and designing an efficient mobility aware routing protocol towards this end has become an important research topic. In this paper, a Mobility Aware Routing Protocol for Low power and Lossy Networks (MARPL) that updates the Preferred Parent Node information soon after it receives the DIO message has been proposed. In the proposed approach, the Mobile Node is aware of its mobility and updates the PPN information without waiting for the route expiration time. To measure the effectiveness of the proposed MARPL, simulation works were carried out on a Contiki-based Cooja simulator for different mobility models. The obtained simulation results showed that the proposed MARPL performed better compared with the standard RPL for healthcare applications.

Keywords

Cooja simulator Low power lossy networks Mobility Preferred Parent Node Random Waypoint 

References

  1. 1.
    Alemdar, H., Ersoy, C.: Wireless sensor networks for healthcare: a survey. Comput. Netw. 54(15), 2688–2710 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aschenbruck, N., Ernst, R., Gerhards-Padilla, E., Schwamborn, M.: BonnMotion: a mobility scenario generation and analysis tool. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International ICST Conference on Simulation Tools and Techniques, p. 51. ICST, Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barcelo, M., Correa, A., Vicario, J.L., Morell, A., Vilajosana, X.: Addressing mobility in RPL with position assisted metrics. IEEE Sens. J. 16(7), 2151–2161 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cobarzan, C., Montavont, J., Noël, T.: Analysis and performance evaluation of RPL under mobility. In: 2014 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC), pp. 1–6, June 2014Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cobârzan, C., Montavont, J., Noel, T.: Integrating mobility in RPL. In: European Conference on Wireless Sensor Networks, pp. 135–150. Springer (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gaddour, O., Koubäa, A., Rangarajan, R., Cheikhrouhou, O., Tovar, E., Abid, M.: Co-RPL: RPL routing for mobile low power wireless sensor networks using corona mechanism. In: Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Embedded Systems (SIES 2014), pp. 200–209, June 2014Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gara, F., Saad, L.B., Ayed, R.B., Tourancheau, B.: RPL protocol adapted for healthcare and medical applications. In: 2015 International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC), pp. 690–695, August 2015Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gara, F., Saad, L.B., Hamida, E.B., Tourancheau, B., Ayed, R.B.: An adaptive timer for RPL to handle mobility in wireless sensor networks. In: 2016 International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC), pp. 678–683, September 2016Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jevtić, M., Zogović, N., Dimić, G.: Evaluation of wireless sensor network simulators. In: Proceedings of the 17th Telecommunications Forum (TELFOR 2009), Belgrade, Serbia, pp. 1303–1306 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ko, J., Chang, M.: MoMoRo: providing mobility support for low-power wireless applications. IEEE Syst. J. 9(2), 585–594 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Korbi, I.E., Brahim, M.B., Adjih, C., Saidane, L.A.: Mobility enhanced RPL for wireless sensor networks. In: 2012 Third International Conference on The Network of the Future (NOF), pp. 1–8, November 2012Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kuntz, R., Montavont, J., Noël, T.: Improving the medium access in highly mobile wireless sensor networks. Telecommun. Syst. 52(4), 2437–2458 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee, K.C., Sudhaakar, R., Dai, L., Addepalli, S., Gerla, M.: RPL under mobility. In: 2012 IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC), pp. 300–304, January 2012Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Levis, P., Patel, N., Culler, D., Shenker, S.: Trickle: a self-regulating algorithm for code propagation and maintenance in wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation - Volume 1, NSDI 2004, p. 2. USENIX Association, Berkeley (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Park, J., Kim, K.H., Kim, K.: An algorithm for timely transmission of solicitation messages in RPL for energy-efficient node mobility. Sensors 17(4), 899 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tian, B., Hou, K.M., Shi, H., Liu, X., Diao, X., Li, J., Chen, Y., Chanet, J.P.: Application of modified RPL under VANET-WSN communication architecture. In: 2013 International Conference on Computational and Information Sciences, pp. 1467–1470, June 2013Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Winter, T.: RPL: IPv6 routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information TechnologyNational Institute of Technology KarnatakaSurathkalIndia

Personalised recommendations