Advertisement

Overcoming the Middle-Income Trap: The Role of Innovation on Switching onto a Higher Income Group for ASEAN Member States

  • Sarah Nadhila Hardiana
  • Fithra Faisal Hastiadi
Chapter

Abstract

In the past decade, many economists have discussed a phenomenon called the middle-income trap as the share of middle-income economies are growing. The trap is known as a condition of stagnant economic growth that prevents economies from reaching high-income level. In recent years, ASEAN countries have successfully reached the middle-income level. This study aims to understand the relationship between innovation and per capita income for ASEAN countries and understand the role of innovation in supporting ASEAN countries to switch towards a higher income level. This study found that innovation along with foreign direct investment and productivity contributes positively towards per capita income. Innovation was also found to increase the probability of moving up the income ladder, specifically for lower middle-income level toward upper middle-income level. Productivity was found to strongly influence the probability of moving up to a higher income level on any level of initial income group. Furthermore, we found that there is a curvilinear relationship between growth factors and per capita income, which indicates that the contribution of growth factors comes with diminishing marginal effects. As income per capita grows toward a higher income level, growth factors contribute towards income at a decreasing rate, which suggests heightened difficulty when moving up the income stages.

Keywords

Middle-income trap Innovation Economic growth Income per capita Technology 

References

  1. Aghion, P., Akcigit, U., & Howitt, P. (2013). What Do We Learn from the Schumpeterian Growth Theory?. NBER Working Paper Series No. 18824.Google Scholar
  2. Ambashi, M. (2017). Innovation Policy in/for ASEAN. Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA). ASEAN@50 Vol. 5.Google Scholar
  3. Athukorala, P.-C., & Woo, W. T. (2011). Malaysia in the Middle-Income Trap. Paper presented at the Asian Economic Panel Meeting, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Baragheh, A., Rowley, J., & Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a Multidisciplinary Definition of Innovation. Management Decision, 47(8), 1323–1339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bordans, E., & Teinemaa, M. (2016). Baltic Tigers Facing the Middle-Income Trap? Latvia: Stockholm School of Economics.Google Scholar
  6. Castaldi, C. (2014). Marking Your Innovation? A Review of the Literature on Trademarks as Indicators of Innovation. A CRE8TV Project Deliverable.Google Scholar
  7. Cling, J.-P., Chí, N. H., Razafindrakoto, M., & Roubaud, F. (2010). How Deep Was the Impact of the Economic Crisis in Vietnam? A Focus on the Informal Sector in Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City. World Bank Working Paper.Google Scholar
  8. Egawa, A. (2013). Will Income Inequality Cause a Middle-Income Trap in Asia? Bruegel Working Paper.Google Scholar
  9. Felipe, J. (2012). Tracking the Middle-Income Trap: What Is It, Who Is in It, and Why? Part 1. ADBI Economics Working Paper Series.Google Scholar
  10. Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1994). Endogenous Innovation in Theory of Growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Le, T. T. V. (2009). The Global Crisis and Vietnam’s Policy Responses. East Asian Policy, 1, 63–74.Google Scholar
  12. Mankiw, N. G. (1989). Real Business Cycles: A New Keynesian Perspective. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(3), 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nidhiprabha, B. (2011). The Global Financial Crisis and Resilience of the Thai Banking Sector. Asian Development Review, 28.  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2001152.
  14. Ozturk, A. (2015). Examining the Economic Growth and the Middle-Income Trap from the Perspective of the Middle Class. International Business Review. 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.03.008.Google Scholar
  15. Paus, E. (2017). Escaping the Middle-Income Trap: Innovate or Perish. ADBI Working Paper Series 685. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute.Google Scholar
  16. Quah, D. (1993). Empirical Cross-Section Dynamics in Economic Growth. LSE Working Paper.Google Scholar
  17. Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rosenberg, N. (2004). Innovation and Economic Growth. Stanford University.Google Scholar
  19. Solow, R. M. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tambunan, T. T. H. (2010). The Indonesian Experience with Two Big Economic Crises. Modern Economy, 1, 156–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Van Tho, T. (2013). The Middle-Income Trap: Issues for Members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. ADBI Working Paper Series No. 421.Google Scholar
  22. Williams, R. A. (2006). Generalized Ordered Logit/Partial Proportional Odds Models for Ordinal Dependent Variables. The Stata Journal, 6(1), 58–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah Nadhila Hardiana
    • 1
  • Fithra Faisal Hastiadi
    • 1
  1. 1.Universitas IndonesiaDepokIndonesia

Personalised recommendations