Nanotechnology and Nanobiotechnology for Environmental Remediation

  • Elham F. Mohamed
  • Gamal Awad
Part of the Nanotechnology in the Life Sciences book series (NALIS)


Environmental contamination is one of the important issues that the world is confronting today, and it is expanding with each passing year and leading to the grave and harmful effect to the earth. At present, the air, water, and soil are contaminated with organic and inorganic pollutants. In parallel, the rapid growth of nanotechnology has gained a great deal of interest in the applications of nanomaterial’s potential in improved systems for monitoring and cleanup including all the three phases of the environment. It can develop the pollutants sensing and detection and help in the improvement of novel remediation technologies. In this chapter, we discuss the recent progress toward the use of nanotechnology and nanobiotechnology in a variety of abovementioned applications. Furthermore, we expand upon the current progress in nanomaterial engineering approaches describing several recent examples that are utilized to enhance stability, catalytic efficiency, and utilization of alternate oxidants. The chapter will provide a comprehensive knowledge in the definition of nanoparticles, the nanotechnology and the nanobiotechnology concept, and design of nanomaterial for potentially practical purposes. Finally, we provide a perspective on the future aspects of nanotechnology and its applications in air pollution remediation.


Ecology Nanobiotechnology Nanoparticles Remediation 


  1. Adeleye AS, Conway JR, Garner K, Huang Y, Su Y, Kell AA (2016) Engineered nanomaterials for water treatment and remediation: costs, benefits, and applicability. Chem Eng J 286:640–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akbari E, Zolkafle B, Aria E, Seyed JM, Mahdi B, Ali S, Ali N (2014) An analytical model and ANN simulation for carbon nanotube based ammonium gas sensors. RSC Adv 4:36896–36904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amade R, Hussain S, Ocana IR, Bertran E (2014) Growth and functionalization of carbon nanotubes on quartz filter for environmental applications. J Environ Eng Ecol Sci 3:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andriantsiferana C, Mohamed EF, Delmas H (2015) Sequential adsorption photocatalytic oxidation process for wastewater treatment using a composite material TiO2/activated carbon. Environ Eng Res 20:181–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Azama MA, Aliasa FM, Tacka LW, Amalina RN, Mohamad RS, Taibb FM (2017) Electronic properties and gas adsorption behaviour of pristine, silicon, and boron-doped (8, 0) single-walled carbon nanotube: a first principles study. J Mol Graph Model 75:85–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baltrusaitis J, Jayaweera PM, Grassian VH (2011) Sulfur dioxide adsorption on TiO2 nanoparticles: influence of particle size, coadsorbates, sample pretreatment, and light on surface speciation and surface coverage. J Phys Chem 115:492–500Google Scholar
  7. Bergmann CP, Machado F (2015) Carbon nanomaterials as adsorbents for environmental and biological applications. Carbon nanostructures (Paulo Araujo, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA), Library of Congress, Springer Cham Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp 1–126Google Scholar
  8. Bhargava A, Jain N, Gangopadhyay S, Panwar J (2015) Development of gold nanoparticle-fungal hybrid based heterogeneous interface for catalytic applications. Process Biochem 50:1293–1300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhawana P, Fulekar MH (2012) Nanotechnology: remediation technologies to clean up the environmental pollutants. Res J Chem Sci 2(2):90–96Google Scholar
  10. Chen Y et al (2011) Electronic detection of lectins using carbohydratefunctionalized nanostructures: graphene versus carbon nanotubes. ACS Nano 6:760–770Google Scholar
  11. Chuaybamroong P, Chotigawin R, Supothina S, Sribenjalux P, Larpkiattaworn S, Wu CY (2010) Efficacy of photocatalytic HEPA filter on microorganism removal. Indoor Air 20:246–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cui H, Li Q, Gao S, Shang JK (2012) Strong adsorption of arsenic species by amorphous zirconium oxide nanoparticles. J Ind Eng Chem 18:1418–1427Google Scholar
  13. Darezereshki E, Khodadadi A, Mahmoud D, Abdollahy A, Jamshidi Z (2018) Influence of heavy metals on the adsorption of arsenate by magnetite nanoparticles: kinetics and thermodynamic. Environ Nanotechnol Monit Manag 10:51–62Google Scholar
  14. Dong F, Zhang M, Huang W, Zhou L, Wong MS, Wang Y (2015) Superhydrophobic/ hydrophobic nanofibrous network with tunable cell adhesion: fabrication, characterization and cellular activities. Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Aspects 482:718–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Esrafili M D (2017) N2O reduction over a fullerene-like boron nitride nanocage: A DFT study. Physics Letters A 381:2085–2091Google Scholar
  16. Essawy HA, El-Shakour AA, Tawfik ME, Mohamed EF, El-Sabbagh SH, El-Hashemy MA (2014) Composite membranes derived from immiscible NBR/SBR blends and amphiphilic montmorillonites: permeability evaluation of these membranes for benzene and toluene in their binary mixtures. RSC Adv 4:33555–33563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gupta VK, Saleh TA (2013) Sorption of pollutants by porous carbon, carbon nanotubes and fullerene − an overview. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:2828–2843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haghighi Pak Z, Abbaspour H, Karimi N, Fattahi A (2016) Eco-friendly synthesis and antimicrobial activity of silver nanoparticles using Dracocephalum moldavica seed extract. Appl Sci 6(69):1–10Google Scholar
  19. Haseley SR (2002) Carbohydrate recognition: a nascent technology for the detection of bioanalytes. Anal Chim Acta 457:39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hsu S, Lu C (2007) Modification of single-walled carbon nanotubes for enhancing isopropyl alcohol vapor adsorption from water streams. Separat Sci Technol 42: 2751–2766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hussain Z, Ameer AA, Ahmed A, Mudhaffar Abdullah B, Yousif E (2015) Nanotitanium dioxide as photocatalytic degradation of pollutants. J Chem Pharm Res 7:522–530Google Scholar
  22. Jiang B, Lian L, Xing Y, Zhang N, Chen Y, Lu P, Zhang D (2018) Advances of magnetic nanoparticles in environmental application: environmental remediation and (bio) sensors as case studies. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 25:30863–30879PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kalele SA, Kundu AA, Gosavi SW, Deobagkar DN, Deobagkar DD, Kulkarni SK (2006) Rapid detection of escherichia coli by using antibody-conjugated silver nanoshells. Small 2:335–338Google Scholar
  24. Khan I, Farhan M, Singh P, Thiagarajan P (2014) Nanotechnology for environmental remediation. Res J Pharm Biol Chem Sci 5(3):1916–1927Google Scholar
  25. Kim J, Choi S-W, Lee J-H, Chung Y, Byun YT (2016) Gas sensing properties of defect-induced single-walled carbon nanotubes. Sen Actuator B-Chem 228:688–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Komkovis VG, Marti M, Delimitis A, Vasalos IA, Triantafyllidis KS (2011) Catalytic decomposition of N2O over highly active supported Ru nanoparticles prepared by chemical reduction with ethylene glycol. Appl Catal B 103:62–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krejcova L, Michalek P, Rodrigo MM, Heger Z, Krizkova S, Vaculovicova M, Hynek D, Adam V, Kizek R (2015) Nanoscale virus biosensors: state of the art. Nanobiosensors Dis Diagn 4:47–66Google Scholar
  28. Krug HF (2009) Book review nanotechnology, volume 2: environmental aspects, chapter 9: epidemiological studies on particulate air pollution. Environ Eng Manag J 8(1):191–194Google Scholar
  29. Le S, Trong HD, Dinh N, Hoai CN, Balikhin IL (2015) Air purification equipment combining a filter coated by silver nanoparticles with a nano-TiO2 photocatalyst for use in hospitals. Adv Nat Sci: Nanosci Nanotechnol 6:1–8Google Scholar
  30. Lee B, Jung JH, Bae GN (2010) Effect of relative humidity and variation of particle number size distribution on the inactivation effectiveness of airborne silver nanoparticles against bacteria bioaerosols deposited on a filter. J Aerosol Sci 41:447–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Li T, Shi L, Wang E, Dong S (2009) Multifunctional G-quadruplex aptamers and their application to protein detection. Chem Eur J 15:1036–1042Google Scholar
  32. Long RQ, Yang RT (2001) Carbon nanotubes as a superior sorbent for removal dioxine. J Amer Chem Soc 123:2058–2059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Low J, Cheng B, Yu J (2017) Surface modification and enhanced photocatalytic CO2 reduction performance of TiO2: a review. Appl Surf Sci 392(15):658–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mehndiratta P, Jain A, Srivastava S, Gupta N (2013) Environnemental pollution and nanotechnology. Environ Pollut 2(2):49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Misson M, Zhang H, Jin B (2015) Nanobiocatalyst advancements and bioprocessing applications. J R Soc Interface 12(102):20140891PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mohamed EF (2017) Nanotechnology: future of environmental air pollution control. Environ Manag Sustain Dev 6:429–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mohamed EF, El-Hashemy MA, Abdel-Latif NM, Shetaya WH (2015) Production of sugarcane bagasse-based activated carbon for formaldehyde gas removal from potted plants exposure chamber. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 65:1413–1420PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mohamed EF, Sayed Ahmed SA, Abdel-Latif NM, Mekawy A (2016a) Air purifier devices based on adsorbents produced from valorization of different environmental hazardous materials for ammonia gas control. RSC Adv 6:57284–57292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mohamed EF, Awad G, Andriantsiferana C, El-Diwany A (2016b) Biofiltration technology for the removal of toluene from polluted air using Streptomyces griseus. Environ Technol 37(10):1197–1207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mukherjee PK (2016) Nanomaterials: materials with immense potential. J Appl Chem 5:714–7181Google Scholar
  41. Nguyen C-C, Vu N-N, Do T-O (2016) Efficient hollow double-shell photocatalysts for the degradation of organic pollutants under visible light and in darkness. J Mater Chem A 4:4413–4419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Özkar S (2009) Enhancement of catalytic activity by increasing surface area in heterogeneous catalysis. Appl Surf Sci 256(5):1272–1277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Petit C, Bandosz T J (2009) MOF–graphite oxide nanocomposites: surface characterization and evaluation as adsorbents of ammonia. J Mater Chem 19 (36):6521–6528Google Scholar
  44. Portela R, Tessinari RF, Suarez S, Rasmussen SB, Alonso MDH, Canela MC, Avila P, Sanchez B (2012) Photocatalysis for continuous air purification in wastewater treatment plants: from lab to reality. Environ Sci Technol 46:5040–5048PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ren X, Chen C, Nagatsu M, Wang X (2011) Carbon nanotubes as adsorbents in environmental pollution management: a review. Chem Eng J 170:395–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ren X, Li J, Tan X, Wang X (2013) Comparative study of graphene oxide, activated carbon and carbon nanotubes as adsorbents for copper decontamination. Dalton Trans 42:5266–5274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Roso M, Sundarrajan S, Pliszka D, Ramakrishna S, Modesti M (2008) Multifunctional membranes based on spinning technologies: the synergy of nanofibers and nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 19:285–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shen W, Zhang C, Li Q, Zhang W, Cao L, Ye J (2015) Preparation of titanium dioxide nanoparticle modified photocatalytic self-cleaning concrete. J Clean Prod 87:762–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Seredych M, Bandosz T J (2012) Manganese oxide and graphite oxide/MnO2 composites as reactive adsorbents of ammonia at ambient conditions. Microporous and Mesoporous Mater 150:55–63Google Scholar
  50. Shintani H, Kurosu S, Miki A, Hayashi F, Kato S (2006) Sterilization efficiency of the photocatalyst against environmental microorganisms in a health care facility. Biocontrol Sci 11:17–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Singh SB, Tandon PK (2014) Catalysis: a brief review on nano-catalyst. J Energy Chem Eng 2(3):106–115Google Scholar
  52. So HM, Park DW, Jeon EK, Kim YH, Kim BS, Lee CK et al (2008) Detection and titer estimation of Escherichia coli using aptamer-functionalized single-walled carbon-nanotube field effect transistors. Small 4:197–201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Srisitthiratkul C, Pongsorrarith V, Intasanta N (2011) The potential use of nanosilver-decorated titanium dioxide nanofibers for toxin decomposition with antimicrobial and self-cleaning properties. Appl Surf Sci 257:8850–8856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stark WJ, Stoessel PR, Wohlleben W, Hafner A (2015) Industrial applications of nanoparticles. Chem Soc Rev 44:5793–5805PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Su F, Lu C, CnenW, Bai H, Hwang JF (2009) Capture of CO2 from flue gas via multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Sci Total Environ 407:3017–3023Google Scholar
  56. Subramanian KS, Tarafdar JC (2011) Prospects of nanotechnology in Indian farming. Indian J Agric Sci 81(10):887–893Google Scholar
  57. Sugunakala S, Krishnaveni K, Neela R (2017) Applications of nanotechnology in water and air pollution treatment. Int J Innov Res Adv Eng 4:2349–2163Google Scholar
  58. Sundarrajan S, Ramakrishna S (2007) Fabrication of nanocomposite membranes from nanofibers and nanoparticles for protection against chemical warfare stimulants. J Mater Sci 42:8400–8407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sundarrajan S, Pliszka D, Ramakrishna S, Jaworek A, Krupa A, Lackowski M (2009) A novel process for the fabrication of nanocomposites membranes. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 9:4442–4447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sung WP, Tsai TT, Wu MJ, Wang HJ, Surampalli RY (2011) Removal of indoor airborne bacteria by nano-Ag/TiO2 as photocatalyst: feasibility study in museum and nursing institutions. J Environ Eng 137:163–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tartaj P, Morales MDD, Veintemillas-Verdaguer S, Gonzalez-Carreno T, Serna CJ (2003) The preparation of magnetic nanoparticles for applications in biomedicine. J Phys D Appl Phys 36:R182–R197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Vikesland PJ, Wigginton KR (2010) Nanomaterial enabled biosensors for pathogen monitoring − a review. Environ Sci Technol 44(10):3656–3669PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Volkert AA, Haes AJ (2014) Advancements in nanosensors using plastic antibodies. Analyst 139(1):21–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wang L, Luo J, Maye MM, Fan Q, Rendeng Q, Engelhard MH, Wang C, Lin Y, Zhong CJ (2005) Iron oxide-gold core-shell nanoparticles and thin film assembly. J Mater Chem 15:1821–1832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wu S, He Q, Tan C, Wang Y, Zhang H (2013) Graphene-based electrochemical sensors. Small 9:1160–1172.Google Scholar
  66. Yadav KK, Singh JK, Gupta N, Kumar V (2017) A review of nanobioremediation technologies for environmental cleanup: a novel biological approach. J Mater Environ Sci 8(2):740–757Google Scholar
  67. Yang X, Shen Z, Zhang B, Yang J, Hong WX, Zhuang Z, Liu J (2013) Silica nanoparticles capture atmospheric lead: implications in the treatment of environmental heavy metal pollution. Chemosphere 90:653–656PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ye Y, Guo Y, Yue Y, Zhang Y (2015) Facile colorimetric detection of nitrite based on anti-aggregation of gold nanoparticles. Anal Methods 7:4090–4096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yildiz O, Bradford PD (2013) Aligned carbon nanotube sheet high efficiency particulate air filters. Carbon 64:295–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zaleska A (2008) Doped-TiO2: a review. Recent Pat Eng 2:157–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zaporotskova IV, Boroznina NP, Parkhomenko YN, Kozhitov LV (2016) Carbon nanotubes: sensor properties. A review. Mod Electron Mater 2(4):95–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zhang X, Qu Z, Li XY, Zhao Q, Wang Y, Quan X (2011) Low temperature CO oxidation over Ag/SBA-15 nanocomposites prepared via in-situ “pH-adjusting” method. Catal Commun 16:11–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zhang C, Sui J, Li J, Tang Y, Cai W (2012) Efficient removal of heavy metal ions by thiol-functionalized superparamagnetic carbon nanotubes. Chem Eng J 210:45–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zhang Y, Yuan S, Feng X, Li H, Zhou J, Wang B (2016) Preparation of nanofibrous metal-organic framework filters for efficient air pollution control. J Am Chem Soc 138:5785–5788PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zhao J, Yang X (2003) Photocatalytic oxidation for indoor air purification: a literature review. Build Environ 38:645–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Zhou R, Hu G, Yu R, Pan C, Wang ZL (2015) Piezotronic effect enhanced detection of flammable/toxic gases by ZnO micro/nanowire sensors. Nano Energy 12:588–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elham F. Mohamed
    • 1
  • Gamal Awad
    • 2
  1. 1.Air Pollution Department, Environmental Research DivisionNational Research CentreDokki, GizaEgypt
  2. 2.Chemistry of Natural and Microbial Products Department, Pharmaceutical and Drug Industries Research DivisionNational Research CenterDokki, GizaEgypt

Personalised recommendations